EQUIPMENT
2004 Thomas Built Buses Saf-T-Liner C2
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Overview
Our database contains no NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2004 Thomas Built Buses Saf-T-Liner C2. 5 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; 1 NHTSA investigation names it; and 136 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Safety recalls
5 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govFUEL SYSTEM, OTHER:DELIVERY:HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS
EQUIPMENT ADAPTIVE/MOBILITY
Safety investigations
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
EMERGENCY DOOR HANDLE FAILURE
THE OFFICE OF DEFECTS INVESTIGATION OPENED THIS PRELIMINARY EVALUATIONAFTERBECOMING AWARE THAT FLEETS WERE HAVING HANDLE FAILURES ON THE REAR EMERGENCY DOOR EXIT.THE FAILURE RESULTED IN THE DOOR HANDLE SEPARATING FROM THEDOOR LATCH MECHANISM.WHEN THE HANDLE FAILS, THE REAR EMERGENCY EXIT DOOR CAN NOT BE OPENED FROM OUTSIDE THE BUS.THE FAILURE RESULTS FROM CORROSION OF THE EXTERIOR DOOR HANDLE AROUND THE SECURING ROLL PIN AND SQUARE DRIVE LATCH MECHANISM, CAUSING THE PROTECTIVE FINISH TO CHIP AND FLAKE.CONTINUED CORROSION WEAKENS THE HANDLE AND EVENTUALLY THE HANDLE MAY BREAK WHILE TRYING TO OPEN THE EXIT DOOR.ODI WAS CONCERNED THAT DURING AN EMERGENCY, A PERSON OUTSIDE OF THE BUS WOULD BREAK THE DOOR HANDLE WHILE TRYING TO OPEN THE EMERGENCY EXIT DOOR,POTENTIALLY DELAYING EVACUATION OF THE BUS.UNDER THE SAFETY RECALL, THE ALUMINUM HANDLES WILL BE REPLACED WITH A MORE ROBUST HANDLE.THE RECALL ACTION RESOLVES THE ISSUES RAISED BY THIS INVESTIGATION. ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
No owner complaints recorded for this model year
Either none have been filed with NHTSA, or this vehicle is too new for reports to have accumulated.
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
VISIBILITY/WIPER
Service Solution for C2 Window Retrofi t (New StyleWindow in Old Style Bus)
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
Revised Technical Service Letter for Series 60 and Series 50 Camshaft Timing Specifications. Camshaft timing, valve lash, injector height, and Jake Brake lash are all very important specifications that must be followed closely in order to optimize the performance and service life of any Detroit Diesel engine.
POWER TRAIN
Thomas Built Buses Service Bulletin for Axle Flange Gasket Replaced with O-Ring. Daimler Trucks North America has released a new axle shaft to hub rubber O-ring (part number 11-30728-000) as a replacement for the paper gasket (part number 11-14418-000). The new O-ring will provide better sealing and is reusable. It is quicker and easier to use compared to the paper gasket, because using a paper gasket requires cleaning the hub when the axle shaft is removed.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES; STRUCTURE:BODY:DOOR
Thomas Built Buses Product Awareness Bulletin on RH 3 POS Switch for Electric Operated Entrance Door
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; EQUIPMENT
Thomas Built Bus Service Bulletin for When troubleshooting powernet issues, use the BCT-460DTNA PowerNet Assessment Tool. As of May 29, 2018, the AutoMeterî is the only Daimler-approved tool for troubleshooting vehicle powernet issues.
EQUIPMENT
Thomas Built Buses Product Awareness Bulletin on Lettering Changes - Notification
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 0 | 6 | 0 | — |
| 2026 | 0 | 7 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 0 | 13 | 0 | — |
| 2024 | 0 | 14 | 0 | — |
| 2023 | 0 | 12 | 0 | — |
| 2022 | 1 | 12 | 0 | — |
| 2021 | 0 | 15 | 0 | — |
| 2020 | 1 | 16 | 0 | — |
| 2019 | 0 | 24 | 0 | — |
| 2018 | 1 | 22 | 1 | — |
| 2017 | 0 | 28 | 1 | — |
| 2016 | 0 | 25 | 1 | — |
| 2015 | 2 | 20 | 1 | — |
| 2014 | 0 | 18 | 1 | — |
| 2013 | 1 | 18 | 2 | — |
| 2012 | 3 | 16 | 1 | — |
| 2011 | 0 | 22 | 4 | — |
| 2010 | 1 | 22 | 6 | — |
| 2009 | 2 | 21 | 7 | — |
| 2008 | 5 | 27 | 9 | — |
| 2007 | 1 | 25 | 4 | — |
| 2006 | 2 | 21 | 4 | — |
| 2005 | 0 | 16 | 4 | — |
| 2004Viewing | 0 | 5 | 1 | — |
| 2003 | 1 | 4 | 1 | — |
| 2002 | 1 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2001 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1999 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1998 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1997 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1996 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1995 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.