AIR BAGS:SIDE/WINDOW:CURTAIN
2010 Toyota Venza
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 79 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2010 Toyota Venza, most frequently naming the electrical, driver assistance and interior & seats categories. 9 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 231 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2010 | 1 | 10 |
| Jul 2010 | 2 | 12 |
| Aug 2010 | 2 | 14 |
| Sep 2010 | 2 | 16 |
| Oct 2010 | 1 | 17 |
| Nov 2010 | 1 | 18 |
| Dec 2010 | 1 | 19 |
| Jan 2011 | 1 | 20 |
| Feb 2011 | 1 | 21 |
| Apr 2011 | 1 | 22 |
| Jul 2011 | 1 | 23 |
| Jun 2012 | 1 | 24 |
| Oct 2012 | 1 | 25 |
| Nov 2012 | 1 | 26 |
| Dec 2012 | 1 | 27 |
| Feb 2013 | 1 | 28 |
| Mar 2013 | 1 | 29 |
| Apr 2013 | 1 | 30 |
| Nov 2013 | 1 | 31 |
| Feb 2014 | 1 | 32 |
| Mar 2014 | 1 | 33 |
| May 2014 | 2 | 35 |
| Aug 2014 | 1 | 36 |
| Feb 2015 | 1 | 37 |
| Jul 2015 | 1 | 38 |
| Aug 2015 | 1 | 39 |
| Oct 2015 | 1 | 40 |
| Jan 2016 | 2 | 42 |
| Feb 2016 | 1 | 43 |
| Jun 2016 | 1 | 44 |
| Aug 2016 | 1 | 45 |
| Nov 2016 | 1 | 46 |
| Feb 2017 | 1 | 47 |
| Apr 2017 | 3 | 50 |
| Jun 2017 | 1 | 51 |
| Nov 2017 | 1 | 52 |
| Jan 2018 | 1 | 53 |
| Feb 2018 | 1 | 54 |
| Apr 2018 | 1 | 55 |
| Jun 2018 | 1 | 56 |
| Oct 2018 | 1 | 57 |
| Sep 2019 | 3 | 60 |
| Feb 2020 | 1 | 61 |
| May 2020 | 1 | 62 |
| Aug 2020 | 1 | 63 |
| May 2021 | 1 | 64 |
| Aug 2021 | 1 | 65 |
| Sep 2021 | 1 | 66 |
| Jan 2022 | 1 | 67 |
| Mar 2022 | 1 | 68 |
| Apr 2022 | 1 | 69 |
| Sep 2022 | 1 | 70 |
| Oct 2022 | 1 | 71 |
| Jan 2023 | 1 | 72 |
| Mar 2023 | 1 | 73 |
| Jan 2024 | 1 | 74 |
| Jul 2024 | 2 | 76 |
| Sep 2025 | 1 | 77 |
| Oct 2025 | 1 | 78 |
| Apr 2026 | 1 | 79 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Electrical1717.5%
- Driver assistance1717.5%
- Interior & seats1111.3%
- Body & structure88.2%
- Brakes88.2%
- Visibility55.2%
- Engine55.2%
- Other / unspecified55.2%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
9 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER
SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
while driving, the sunroof made a loud explosion and shattered everywhere.
- NHTSA ID
- 11731288
- Incident
- Apr 13, 2026
The contact owns a 2010 Toyota Venza. The contact stated that while the vehicle was parked and occupied, while attempting to start the vehicle, the vehicle failed to respond as intended. An independent mechanic was contacted. The vehicle was not taken to the dealer to be diagnosed; however, an independent mechanic arrived at the residence to diagnose the vehicle and retrieved a fault code related to the ECM. The mechanic also informed the contact to call a locksmith regarding the key fob. The contact stated that the failure had occurred on several occasions. The engine control module and the purge valve were replaced, and the vehicle was repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was unknown.
- NHTSA ID
- 11692554
- Incident
- Sep 15, 2025
The contact owns a 2010 Toyota Venza. The contact stated that while driving at 60 MPH, the air bag warning light illuminated. The contact stated that on a separate occasion, the horn failed to operate as intended. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic, where it was diagnosed and determined that the failures were related. However, no cause for the failure was found. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not contacted or notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 93,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11684426
- Incident
- Aug 11, 2025
- Mileage
- 93,000 mi
When I open the driver's side when car running, the check SRS airbag system warning light comes on. It also comes on if I start car with door open.
- NHTSA ID
- 11600122
- Incident
- Jan 1, 2024
The contact submitted the complaint on behalf of her friend. The contact stated that while the contact's friend was driving, the friend heard a ticking noise and the check engine warning light illuminated. The contact's friend drove the vehicle to the intended destination. The contact's friend exited the vehicle and noticed a large amount of oil on the ground that had leaked from underneath the vehicle. The vehicle was towed to the dealer where it was diagnosed with failed oil cooler hoses. The contact's friend was informed that the oil cooler hoses needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and a case was filed. In addition, the contact was informed that the previous unknown warranty for the failure description had expired. The failure mileage was approximately 184,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11598690
- Incident
- Jun 24, 2024
- Mileage
- 184,000 mi
Since I bought the Venza, the brake has not been working well, so I am trembling with fear and the risk of an accident countless times. I didn't know how to claim this, so I endured it and drove this car until now. Today, after reading an article about Fisker's break issue investigation. I decided to report it to NHTSA. Please investigate this and resolve this issue.
- NHTSA ID
- 11566021
- Incident
- Jan 17, 2024
On or around March 10, 2023, as my wife and daughter were driving the driver's side heated seat started burning/smoking. Immediately, my wife turned off the seat and returned home. I found there was an existing recall for this issue but only for the Southeast Toyota Distributors, I purchased my car in Missouri. I took the vehicle to the local dealership in Clarksville, Tennessee. Not only would they not honor the recall, but charged me $115.88 to confirm the burning of the seat. I contacted Toyota 7 times thus far and they are refusing to help because the recall only affected the Southeast Distributor group. I find this ludicrous as all the vehicles were made at the Georgetown, Kentucky plant. I simply want the remedy that Southeast Toyota Distributors gave their customers: Removal of bad heating unit, return of $115.88 charge of confirmation, and a return of the accessory charge I paid in December 2009. Thank you, [XXX] INFORMATION Redacted PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6).
- NHTSA ID
- 11514537
- Incident
- Mar 10, 2023
The heated seat on the driver side is creating a burning smell. I have read about numerous other issues with this model that have had recalls but not mine. This seat is still in tact and available for full inspection upon request. This is a major safety issue that is known about but not addressed. Major fire risk putting anyone inside vehicle in danger. I have a 2 year old daughter and if I didn’t have a lot of electrical and vehicle knowledge I could have easily left the heated seat on not knowing and caused a major risk for my entire family. Toyota needs to add the rest of the vehicles that have these issues into the recall. I have not taken into dealer yet just informed my wife not to use heated seat. I plan to take in soon to dealer but with a known issue it should be covered by a recall and not out of pocket. No police, insurance or manufacture have inspected yet. No warning lights on at all.
- NHTSA ID
- 11501823
- Incident
- Nov 1, 2022
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
Some 2005 – 2026 Toyota vehicles that have undergone water intrusion may exhibit a condition in which a musty odor is present. Follow the procedures in this bulletin to remediate the odor and address this condition. The purpose of this Service Bulletin is to provide general guidelines and procedures for odor remediation. This Service Bulletin provides a guide on how to prepare and treat the interior of the vehicle for odor remediation. Refer to the applicable model and model year Repair Manual and the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) website for the most up-to-date safety and precautionary guidelines.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle, especially the horizontal areas such as the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage to the painted surfaces can occur. Acid rain damage can typically be identified on vehicles by the presence of stains on the paint surface that resemble hard water spots. Unlike water spots however, acid rain damage cannot be removed by regular washing procedures. Also, because acid rain can etch and soften the paint, normal buffing or polishing repair procedures should not be attempted. This can cause further damage and result in visible depressions in the paint surface. The following are the three major categories of acid rain damage: •Minor damage: requires only buffing to repair. •Moderate damage: usually requires neutralizing, color sanding, and buffing. •Severe damage: extending beyond 1/2 mil of clearcoat on a pearl, metallic, or solid color, requires neutralization, sanding, and repainting. In cases where acid rain damage is minor, neutralization and buffing with a liquid-type paint finessing product may provide an adequate repair. Only specially formulated products outlined in this bulletin should be used for that purpose. Unfortunately, other than minor damage, there is no simple method of determining the actual extent (depth) of acid penetration other than color sanding a representative affected area until there is no visible etching or depressions, followed by measuring the amount of paint removed with either a magnetic or digital-type film thickness gauge. The procedures in this bulletin are intended for use by qualified body/paint technicians and should not be attempted by inexperienced personnel. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. Perform frequent vehicle washing, as often as daily, during high heat and humidity periods to minimize the potential for paint damage due to acid rain exposure. This is especially important in geographical areas known for high frequency and concentration of acid rain and industrial fallout.
STRUCTURE:BODY
The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these contaminants settle and remain on a painted vehicle surface, especially the horizonal areas of the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage can occur. This damage is the result of actual etching of the paint and appears as pitting or water spots. As acid rain droplets on the vehicle surface evaporate, the concentration strength of the acid increases, causing deeper and more rapid damage. This evaporation and corrosive action also occur more rapidly on dark colored cars as direct sun heat increases. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. In areas known for high frequency and/or concentration of acid rain, frequent vehicle washing during high heat or humidity periods will minimize the potential for paint damage caused by acid rain. It is further recommended that either reverse osmosis or deionized water be used to prevent water spotting.
STRUCTURE:BODY
To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Toyota vehicles are currently protected with RapgardTM protective film designed to protect the horizontal painted surfaces. This material protects from acid rain, environmental fallout, and rail contamination. Follow the Removal Procedure in this bulletin to remove the RapgardTM protective film within 90 days from initial application.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Vehicles may occasionally be subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles shed from railroad tracks, train wheels, exposure to heavy machinery facilities, grinding, welding, etc. This type of contamination can be identified by the presence of small, red or brown particles on the paint surface. These particles are often difficult to see on dark color paints but can be easily felt when brushing a hand across horizontal body surfaces such as the hood, roof, or deck lid. Follow the Repair Procedure in this bulletin to clean vehicles that may have been subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles such as rail dust during rail transportation or extended storage near industrial areas.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.