SEATS:MID/REAR ASSEMBLY
2021 Ford Explorer
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 456 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2021 Ford Explorer, most frequently naming the powertrain (other), driver assistance and engine categories. 26 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; 3 NHTSA investigations name it; and 297 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 2021 | 5 | 18 |
| Jan 2022 | 2 | 20 |
| Feb 2022 | 4 | 24 |
| Mar 2022 | 5 | 29 |
| Apr 2022 | 4 | 33 |
| May 2022 | 5 | 38 |
| Jun 2022 | 11 | 49 |
| Jul 2022 | 2 | 51 |
| Aug 2022 | 5 | 56 |
| Sep 2022 | 6 | 62 |
| Oct 2022 | 2 | 64 |
| Nov 2022 | 2 | 66 |
| Dec 2022 | 1 | 67 |
| Jan 2023 | 2 | 69 |
| Feb 2023 | 5 | 74 |
| Mar 2023 | 5 | 79 |
| Apr 2023 | 7 | 86 |
| May 2023 | 4 | 90 |
| Jun 2023 | 11 | 101 |
| Jul 2023 | 6 | 107 |
| Aug 2023 | 7 | 114 |
| Sep 2023 | 9 | 123 |
| Oct 2023 | 12 | 135 |
| Nov 2023 | 11 | 146 |
| Dec 2023 | 7 | 153 |
| Jan 2024 | 14 | 167 |
| Feb 2024 | 6 | 173 |
| Mar 2024 | 10 | 183 |
| Apr 2024 | 4 | 187 |
| May 2024 | 7 | 194 |
| Jun 2024 | 6 | 200 |
| Jul 2024 | 12 | 212 |
| Aug 2024 | 5 | 217 |
| Sep 2024 | 3 | 220 |
| Oct 2024 | 5 | 225 |
| Nov 2024 | 3 | 228 |
| Dec 2024 | 7 | 235 |
| Jan 2025 | 6 | 241 |
| Feb 2025 | 4 | 245 |
| Mar 2025 | 9 | 254 |
| Apr 2025 | 9 | 263 |
| May 2025 | 3 | 266 |
| Jun 2025 | 12 | 278 |
| Jul 2025 | 13 | 291 |
| Aug 2025 | 15 | 306 |
| Sep 2025 | 6 | 312 |
| Oct 2025 | 8 | 320 |
| Nov 2025 | 7 | 327 |
| Dec 2025 | 11 | 338 |
| Jan 2026 | 7 | 345 |
| Feb 2026 | 11 | 356 |
| Mar 2026 | 8 | 364 |
| Apr 2026 | 14 | 378 |
| May 2026 | 4 | 382 |
| Jun 2026 | 7 | 389 |
| Jul 2026 | 17 | 406 |
| Aug 2026 | 6 | 412 |
| Sep 2026 | 18 | 430 |
| Oct 2026 | 22 | 452 |
| Nov 2026 | 4 | 456 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Powertrain (other)12625.0%
- Driver assistance6613.1%
- Engine6011.9%
- Visibility5110.1%
- Electrical509.9%
- Fuel system285.6%
- Brakes255.0%
- Body & structure255.0%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
26 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govPOWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
SEAT BELTS
Safety investigations
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
Burn Injuries From Side Airbag Deployment
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received 8 Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQs) and 4 Early Warning Reporting “Death and Injury” reports alleging burn injuries following side airbag deployment in model years 2021-2026 Ford Explorer vehicles. Consumers have described that during a crash involving deployment of the seat-mounted side airbag, they sustained burn injuries. Burn injuries have been reported for both drivers and front passengers and were typically diagnosed as second or third-degree burns requiring medical treatment. Some of the VOQs report injuries to law enforcement officers following side airbag deployments in Ford Explorer Police Interceptors. ODI has opened this PE to evaluate the scope, frequency, and potential safety-related consequences of the alleged defect. To review the ODI reports cited in the Opening Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.
Loss of Motive Power
On July 22, 2022, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) granted a Defect Petition (DP22001) and opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE22007) to investigate allegations of loss of motive power in model year (MY) 2021 Ford Bronco vehicles equipped with 2.7L EcoBoost engines. Complainants were reporting sudden engine failure while driving resulting in a loss of motive power, often without the ability to restart. During PE22007, the cause of engine failure and loss of motive power in the subject vehicles was determined to be intake valve fracture, and the full scope of vehicles affected by the subject defect was identified as all MY 2021-2022 Ford and Lincoln models equipped with either the 2.7L or 3.0L EcoBoost engines, referred to as the “Nano” engine family. If an intake valve fractures in the subject engines, it may drop into the cylinder and contact the piston, often resulting in catastrophic engine damage. On September 29, 2023, PE22007 was upgraded to an Engineering Analysis (EA23002) to further investigate the subject defect across the full scope of affected vehicles. During EA23002, ODI visited Ford facilities to review technical information related to intake valve fracture in “Nano” engines, coordinated with NHTSA’s Vehicle Research and Testing Center (VRTC), and analyzed updated field data relating the subject defect. Forensic analysis of fractured intake valves demonstrated that the defective components exhibited “grinding burn” or out of specification hardness in the area of the keeper grooves. The presence of grinding burn is evidence that during the groove grinding phase of production, the temperature of the valve became sufficiently high to alter the microstructure of the material and is indicative that the valve supplier’s manufacturing processes were not within control specifications. Grinding burn results in a hard, brittle microstructure and high residual stresses toward the surface of the valve. Through normal engine loading, a valve with grinding burn will likely fracture at the area of highest vulnerability, which is the third keeper groove. In its response to the EA23002 Information Request (IR) letter, Ford provided evidence of 396 customer complaints (including field reports), 825 warranty claims, and 936 engine exchanges. When considering both ODI and manufacturer failure report data, there have been reports representing 1066 unique vehicles within the subject vehicle population. Analysis of the failure report data demonstrates that vehicles equipped with potentially defective intake valves were built within a production “spike period” of May 2021 – October 2021. The beginning of the spike period corresponds to a ramp up in production at the valve supplier manufacturing facility, and the end of the spike period aligns with the implementation of several mid-production process improvements and the decision to change the metal alloy used to produce intake valves from “Silchrome Lite” to “Silchrome 1”. Ford began investigating the subject defect in July 2021, determined the root cause, and took corrective measures for the new production vehicles. Analysis of the failure report data demonstrates that these corrective actions were successful in eliminating the risk of intake valve fracture for subject vehicles produced after October 2021. However, Ford did not take any field action to address vehicles produced during the spike period, and in the several months following the implementation of the production changes, a significant number of field failures continued to occur. It is Ford’s assessment that not all valves produced during the spike period are defective, and that failures associated with the subject defect occur at low time in service. Analysis of the failure report data demonstrates that the vast majority of failures have occurred before 20,000 miles with over half of all reported failures occurring before 5,000 miles. The rate of reported failures related to the subject defect has steadily decreased since November 2021. ODI coordinated with NHTSA’s National Center for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA) to conduct statistical analysis and predict the number of future failures associated with the subject defect. The results of this analysis, and the trends identified through the failure report data are generally consistent with Ford’s assessment that defective intake valves will likely fail at a low time in service and indicate that the majority of subject vehicles equipped with defective valves have already experienced a failure. On August 23, 2024, Ford submitted recall 24V635 for subject vehicles equipped with “Nano” engines and built within the production spike period identified above (total population 90,736 vehicles). The remedy includes an inspection at a Ford/Lincoln dealership where the lifetime engine cycles of the vehicle will be determined. If a vehicle does not meet a threshold for lifetime engine cycles, the dealership will conduct a high RPM engine cycle accumulation procedure, which aims to identify if the vehicle is equipped with defective intake valves. Any vehicle that fails the accumulation procedure will receive an engine replacement under the recall. In addition to recall 24V635, Ford has stated that it will launch customer satisfaction campaign 24N12, which will provide extended warranty coverage to the subject vehicles through the earlier of 10 years or 150,000 miles. In view of the recall action being taken by Ford, ODI is closing this Engineering Analysis. To review the reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.
Rear Axle Bolt Failure
On July 17, 2023, the Office of Defect Investigation (ODI) opened this Recall Query (RQ) after receiving 2 consumer complaints alleging loss of vehicle forward power and/or loss of transmission torque of the rear wheels in model year (MY) 2020-2022 Ford Explorer vehicles (subject vehicles). The RQ was opened to focus on the effectiveness of the remedies of Recalls 22V-255 and 23V-199 related to the alleged problem. Recall 22V-255 involved replacing the bushing and axle cover in the following subject vehicles: 3.3L FHEV Police built before October 14, 2020, and 3.3L Gas Police vehicle built before January 31, 2021. For 2.3L RWD, 3.0L PHEV, 3.3LFHEV, and 3.0LST retail (non-police) vehicles, the recall provided an PCM software update to engage the Electronic Park Brake (EPB) when Park is commanded. The recall addressed a breakage of the rear axle bolt that can cause the driveshaft/half shafts to disconnect, resulting in a loss of transmission torque to the rear wheels necessary to hold park. If the parking brake is not applied, the loss of the primary park torque will allow the vehicle to roll in park increasing the risk of crash and injury. Recall 23V-199 addressed 674 of the subject vehicles produced from February 2, 2019 to April 4, 2022, which received an incorrect remedy under Recall 22V-255. The affected vehicles had received a previous Powertrain Control Module (PCM) update which did not include an automatic EPB engagement when vehicle is shifted to park. On October 17, 2023, Ford filed a new safety recall (Recall 23V-675) covering 238,364 MY 2020-2022 Explorer vehicles with the following powertrains: 3.3L FHEV Police, 3.3L Gas Police, 3.0L Gas Police, 2.3L RWD, 3.0L PHEV, 3.3L FHEV, 3.0L RWD and 3.0L AWD, produced from October 22, 2018 to July 6, 2022, equipped with a 3-point mounted axle design. Ford stated that the cause of the bolt fracture is due to joint design not robust to peak axle input torques and manufacturing variability. The primary contributor is insufficient bearings for maximum joint loads. This can result in bearing deformation, increasing bending stress on the bolt, which may lead to fatigue failure. On January 19, 2023, Ford amended Recall 23V-675 to add 1,942 MY 2020-2022 Explorer vehicles with the following powertrain: 3.0L RWD Platinum and King Ranch variant, produced from October 22, 2018 to July 6, 2022, equipped with a 3-point mounted axle design. In addition to the safety recall, Ford will conduct a customer satisfaction program for the following MY 2020-2022 Explorer vehicles with the following powertrains: 2.3L AWD, 3.3L Gas Retail, 3.0L Gas AWD Platinum and King Ranch, produced from October 22, 2018 to July 6, 2022. Ford stated that the Explorer powerpack variants not covered under Recalled 23V-675 do not present an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety due to the combination of lower peak torque levels and torque management strategies to share inputs between front and rear axles, reducing occurrence of higher torque. According to Ford, this is also evidenced by the lower current and projected failure rates. In view of the recall action being taken by Ford, ODI is closing this RQ. NHTSA will continue to monitor complaints from the customer satisfaction program vehicles and reopen this issue, if necessary. The agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances. To review the reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
While driving, the transmission commanded the parking pawl to engage while the vehicle was in motion. This caused an immediate, violent loss of propulsion in traffic, posing a severe crash risk. Furthermore, because the parking pawl sheared off at speed, the vehicle now poses a critical rollaway risk when shifted into "Park." This perfectly matches the exact safety hazard and mechanical failure described in NHTSA Campaign 26V402 (Ford Recall 26S48). Town and Country Ford ([XXX]) diagnosed the failure, pulled diagnostic trouble codes P07E4 and P07E6, and found heavy metal shavings in the pan directly resulting from the pawl engaging at speed. An independent 3rd-party inspector also physically examined the vehicle and formally documented the catastrophic internal damage. Despite displaying the exact symptoms, codes, and mechanical failure outlined in 26V402, my specific VIN ([XXX]) is currently excluded from the recall. This proves the scope of Ford's current recall is too narrow and is leaving inherently dangerous vehicles on public roads. I am now facing a $10,400 out-of-pocket repair for a known federal safety defect simply because my build date falls outside Ford's arbitrary recall window. The fully intact transmission is currently sitting at Town & Country Ford and is available for immediate NHTSA engineering inspection to prove the 26V402 defect extends beyond the currently recalled VINs. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11776799
- Incident
- Oct 2, 2026
My 2021 Ford Explorer is subject to safety recall 26S14/NHTSA 26V117. Ford announced this recall in March 2026, but as of November 3, 2026, Ford still identifies the remedy as unavailable. Authorized dealers cannot inspect, repair, or close the recall. The unresolved recall prevents lawful use of the vehicle on a car-sharing platform and leaves me paying for a vehicle that cannot be used for its intended purpose. Ford previously projected earlier remedy dates, which have been delayed. I am requesting that NHTSA review whether Ford is administering this recall within a reasonable timeframe and require Ford to provide a firm remedy schedule.
- NHTSA ID
- 11775533
- Incident
- Feb 24, 2026
Here's the updated submission, without the engine paragraph. **Form fields** - **VIN:** 1FM5K8GC7MGA77908 - **Incident date:** today's date - **Crash / fire / injury:** No - **Components:** Visibility (Windshield Wiper/Washer), Power Train (Automatic Transmission), Seats **Narrative** ``` I am filing because my 2021 Ford Explorer (VIN 1FM5K8GC7MGA77908) has three open safety recalls with no remedy available, and Ford has already missed its own remedy date on at least one. 1. NHTSA 26V117 / Ford 26S14 (filed Mar 3, 2026) – Front windshield wiper motor may become inoperative or operate intermittently, causing loss of visibility. Ford stated the remedy was anticipated in Q2 2026. As of November 2, 2026, the remedy is still listed as not available. 2. NHTSA 26V402 / Ford 26S48 (filed Jun 24, 2026) – Transmission may engage Park while the vehicle is moving, damaging the parking system so the vehicle could roll away while in Park. Ford's interim instruction is to always set the parking brake. The remedy is not anticipated until Q2 2027, leaving a roll-away risk unaddressed for roughly a year. 3. NHTSA 26V451 / Ford 26S52 (filed Jul 14, 2026) – Second-row easy-entry seat switch may stick, allowing the seat to tip or slide while driving. Remedy is listed as not yet available. I request that NHTSA require Ford to provide interim remedies or loaner vehicles for these open recalls and to commit to firm remedy dates. ENGINE: My vehicle has the 3.0L engine and was built in Chicago on January 16, 2021, before the June 7, 2021 start of the recall 24S55 (NHTSA 24V635) build range. I request that NHTSA confirm Ford's analysis supports excluding earlier 3.0L builds from the valve fracture population. ``` If you'd rather keep the engine question in, paste the short "ENGINE:" paragraph from my last message above the final request line. Save the confirmation number when you submit.
- NHTSA ID
- 11775263
- Incident
- Mar 2, 2026
The contact owns a 2021 Ford Explorer. The contact stated that while driving approximately 70 MPH and making a left turn, the steering wheel suddenly became difficult to turn, causing the driver to lose control of the vehicle, and the vehicle crashed into a concrete wall barrier. The vehicle sustained severe damages on the passenger-side and was towed to the local Collision Center. A Police report was filed. The contact sustained a right hip injury. Medical attention was needed but was not yet received. The failure mileage was 91,942.
- NHTSA ID
- 11775152
- Incident
- Oct 5, 2026
- Mileage
- 91,942 mi
The brake pedal on my 2021 Ford Explorer intermittently sticks or fails to return to its upright position after being depressed. This mechanical binding and failure to release changes drastically with seasonal weather transitions and ambient temperature drops. When the vehicle or the outside air is cold, the pedal requires me to physically hook my foot underneath the pedal arm to pull it back up so that the brakes fully disengage. This creates a severe safety hazard, as the brakes remain partially applied or sluggish to respond, which causes unexpected vehicle deceleration, brake drag, and a delayed throttle response when trying to accelerate. The vehicle is unpredictable to drive in traffic. The vehicle has been inspected, and the issue is characteristic of an internal manufacturing defect or tight tolerances within the Electronic Brake Booster (EBB) assembly under temperature fluctuations, similar to the issues addressed in Ford’s prior Customer Satisfaction Program 20B51.
- NHTSA ID
- 11774345
- Incident
- Oct 1, 2026
The contact owns a 2021 Ford Explorer. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 26V117000 (VISIBILITY); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The local dealer was contacted. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue.
- NHTSA ID
- 11773848
- Incident
- Oct 26, 2026
On October 21, 2026, after an approximately one-hour round trip in our 2021 Ford Explorer, we arrived home and noticed smoke coming from under the hood. When we opened the hood, we found oil spread throughout the engine compartment. The smoke and oil leak raised concerns about a possible fire and the safety of continuing to drive the vehicle. The vehicle had recently received its second replacement engine, installed by Stuckey Ford of Bellefonte on September 2, 2026. We brought it back to that dealership on October 23. Service staff told us they believed the oil leak involved the valve cover gasket on the recently installed long block. This is a preliminary diagnosis; we have not received written confirmation of the cause. As of October 26, the vehicle remains at the dealership awaiting repair and is available there for inspection upon arrangement. Whether Ford has independently inspected this new issue is unknown. The vehicle has a history of repeated oil loss and low oil pressure warnings. The original engine was replaced under warranty in June 2024 at approximately 39,574 miles after the dealership documented oil in cylinder 2 and heavy cylinder wall scoring. In June 2026, we again reported almost no oil and a low oil warning. In July 2026, at 77,206 miles, the dealership documented excessive oil consumption and internal oil burning in cylinder 3, leading to the September replacement. Shortly after that replacement, the vehicle also displayed an overheating warning and required towing. The dealership found that a coolant hose had come off and repaired it in September. Whether warning lights or messages appeared before the October 21 oil leak and smoke incident is unknown. The repeated engine problems and this new incident have left us concerned about safely using the vehicle.
- NHTSA ID
- 11773782
- Incident
- Oct 21, 2026
Fire started around center console when car was parked. HVAC/ info screen/ rear view mirror substained severe burn.
- NHTSA ID
- 11773440
- Incident
- Oct 22, 2026
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; POWER TRAIN
This bulletin supersedes 26-2226. Reason for update: update the Service procedure for 2021-2022 F-150 3.5L EcoBoost vehicles with new Ford Diagnosis and Repair System(FDRS) C clutch data anomaly detection test.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; POWER TRAIN
This bulletin supersedes 26-2226. Reason For Update: update the Service Procedure for 2021-2022 F-150 3.5L EcoBoost vehicles with the new Ford Diagnosis and Repair System (FDRS) C clutch data anomaly detection diagnostic test. Some of the vehicles listed in the Model statement above may exhibit at least one of the following conditions: * Harsh engagement * Delayed engagement * Harsh shift * Delayed shift * Illuminated malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) with diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) P0751, P0752, P0756, P0757, P0761, P0762, P0766, P0767, P0771, P0772, P2700, P2701, P2702, P2703, P2704, P2705, P2707, P2708, P0729, P0731, P0732, P0733, P0734, P0735, P0736, P076F, P07D9, P07F6 and/or P07F7 stored in the powertrain control module (PCM) or transmission control module (TCM). This may be due to PCM software and/or axial movement of the CDF clutch cylinder (7H351) sleeve causing hydraulic circuit leaks. NOTE: If internal transmission service is required to address a concern detected with the CDF clutch cylinder following this article, technicians should carefully inspect and replace other transmission c
ENGINE
Some 2020-2026 Aviator/Explorer/F-150/Bronco/Ranger vehicles equipped with a 2.7L or 3.0L (non-diesel) engine may need the front engine cover removed and reinstalled for various reasons. The Workshop Manual (WSM), Section 303-01 Engine > Removal and Installation > Engine Front Cover service procedure has been updated to include a new essential special service tool (ESST) guide pin alignment tool (303-1790) that is used to align the engine front cover to the engine block, preventing the O-ring seal on the engine oil galley feed tube from getting damaged during installation.
ENGINE
Some 2020-2024 Explorer/Aviator vehicles equipped with 3.0L EcoBoost/hybrid engine may exhibit blue or black exhaust smoke on startup for the first 5 minutes after an overnight cold soak with no illuminated malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) or powertrain diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) present. This may be due to engine oil breaching the dynamic oil seals separating the bearing core from the turbine housing in the left side turbocharger assembly. There is a new, updated left side turbocharger oil supply tube equipped with an internal check valve to prevent the engine oil from entering turbine housing after the engine is off. Replace the existing left side turbocharger oil supply tube with the updated service part that includes the check valve (service part# L1MZ-9T516-B) or latest level part. Refer to the Workshop Manual (WSM), Section 303-04 Fuel Charging and Controls - Turbocharger > Removal and Installation > Turbocharger Oil Supply Tube LH. For claiming, use causal part 9T516 and labor operation code 9440AL.
SUSPENSION; VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
This article supersedes TSB 25-2373 to update a print error on publication. Some vehicles listed in the model statement above may exhibit an illuminated powertrain malfunction (wrench) indicator with diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) C00A6 and/or C0631. This may be due to the front axle disconnect actuator/intermediate shaft.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; POWER TRAIN
This article supersedes 26-2287. Reason for update: update the labor operation numbers to add MT to operations C, F, G, H, J, K, L and M, and correct the part number LIMZ-4A015-B to L1MZ-4A015-B. Some of the vehicles listed in the Model statement above may exhibit at least one of the following conditions: Harsh engagement Delayed engagement Harsh shift Delayed shift Illuminated malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) with diagnostic trouble codes (DTC)s P0751, P0752, P0756, P0757, P0761, P0762, P0766, P0767, P0771, P0772, P2700, P2701, P2702, P2703, P2704, P2705, P2707, P2708, P0729, P0731, P0732, P0733, P0734, P0735, P0736, P076F, P07D9, P07F6 and/or P07F7 stored in the powertrain control module (PCM) or transmission control module (TCM). This may be due to axial movement of the CDF clutch cylinder sleeve causing hydraulic circuit leaks. NOTE: If internal transmission service is required to address a concern detected with the CDF clutch cylinder following this article, technicians should carefully inspect and replace other transmission components and flush transmission fluid cooler only as ne
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2026 | 44 | 15 | 1 | 64.7 |
| 2025 | 111 | 20 | 1 | 65.8 |
| 2024 | 21 | 10 | 1 | 66.0 |
| 2023 | 113 | 15 | 1 | 64.8 |
| 2022 | 276 | 24 | 3 | 69.9 |
| 2021Viewing | 456 | 26 | 3 | 69.2 |
| 2020 | 1,254 | 33 | 3 | 67.3 |
| 2019 | 303 | 6 | 1 | 61.1 |
| 2018 | 736 | 7 | 2 | 64.7 |
| 2017 | 1,706 | 14 | 2 | 64.6 |
| 2016 | 2,467 | 15 | 2 | 60.5 |
| 2015 | 1,820 | 9 | 5 | 66.2 |
| 2014 | 1,684 | 7 | 4 | 60.4 |
| 2013 | 2,239 | 12 | 6 | 61.8 |
| 2012 | 831 | 7 | 4 | 60.2 |
| 2011 | 1,198 | 8 | 4 | 61.9 |
| 2010 | 115 | 2 | 1 | 53.1 |
| 2009 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 45.6 |
| 2008 | 148 | 3 | 1 | 52.2 |
| 2007 | 208 | 3 | 1 | 52.1 |
| 2006 | 630 | 4 | 0 | 47.1 |
| 2005 | 497 | 3 | 2 | 54.7 |
| 2004 | 1,304 | 4 | 4 | 59.5 |
| 2003 | 1,131 | 7 | 3 | 59.9 |
| 2002 | 3,295 | 10 | 7 | 62.6 |
| 2001 | 375 | 12 | 2 | 65.6 |
| 2000 | 952 | 15 | 4 | 66.1 |
| 1999 | 1,348 | 15 | 6 | 65.4 |
| 1998 | 1,959 | 14 | 8 | 67.4 |
| 1997 | 1,731 | 12 | 6 | 66.6 |
| 1996 | 1,450 | 11 | 3 | 66.9 |
| 1995 | 843 | 12 | 6 | 66.2 |
| 1994 | 1,207 | 7 | 13 | 68.2 |
| 1993 | 939 | 9 | 14 | 68.0 |
| 1992 | 633 | 7 | 14 | 67.7 |
| 1991 | 609 | 11 | 17 | 68.5 |
| 1990 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 47.9 |
| 1989 | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 1988 | 4 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 1987 | 3 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 1986 | 3 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 1985 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1984 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1977 | 2 | 0 | 0 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.