WENT TO DEALERSHIP REGARDING NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER : 99V340000 (BRAKES) AND DEALER SAID DUE TO MILEAGE OF JEEP THAT THE RECALL WOULD NOT BE DONE. *JB
- NHTSA ID
- 10178272
- Incident
- Dec 20, 2006
Owner-reported complaints naming the brake system, filed with NHTSA
Data refreshed
Reports naming service brakes, the antilock braking system, brake hoses, master cylinders or the parking brake. Every record below is an owner-reported complaint about the 1994 Jeep Cherokee submitted to NHTSA — not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. 66 reports on file name it.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
The 25 most recent of 66, in the owner's own words
WENT TO DEALERSHIP REGARDING NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER : 99V340000 (BRAKES) AND DEALER SAID DUE TO MILEAGE OF JEEP THAT THE RECALL WOULD NOT BE DONE. *JB
MANUFACTURE REFUSES TO FOLLOW RECALL #94V043000....ALSO REFUSED TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NUMEROUS OTHER DEFECTS AS NOTED BY THEIR TECHNICAL BULLETINS, I.E. DRIVER'S DOOR FELL OFF FRAME.. *CB
WHILE DRIVING 25 MPH DRIVER APPLIED THE BRAKES AND THE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR, CAUSING CONSUMER'S VEHICLE TO REAR END ANOTHER VEHICLE. UPON IMPACT, AIRBAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. DRIVER SUSTAINED NECK INJURIES AND WAS TRANSPORTED BY AMBULANCE TO HOSPITAL. *AK
MY 1994 JEEP CHEROKEE FRONT PASSENGER ROTOR BROKE INTO TWO PIECES BECAUSE OF EXCESS RUST. WHEN I BRAKED THE CAR PULLED VERY HARD TO THE LEFT. IT WAS VERY DIFFICULT AND DANGEROUS FOR ME TO BRAKE. WHEN I LOOKED UP RECALLS FOR 1994 JEEP CHEROKEE'S, CARS PURCHASED AND REGISTERED IN VIRGINIA ARE NOT PART OF THE NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 99V340000, BUT MARYLAND AND DC CARS WERE ON THE RECALL LIST. I LIVE 5 MILES FROM MARYLAND/DC. YOU SHOULD PUT ALL STATES ON THIS RECALL. I COULD HAVE KILLED SOMEONE OR DIED YESTERDAY. *LA
JEEP CHEROKEE 1994 TENDS TO STILL SLIDE A BIT WHEN BRAKES ARE APPLIED. EVEN WHEN I REPLACED BRAKE PADS PROBLEM STILL EXISTS. HAE ASKED OTHER JEEP OWNER WITH THE SAME YEAR AND THEY HAVE TOLD ME THE SAME THING HAPPENS TO THEIR JEEPS.*AK
EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE OCCURS INTERMITTENTLY WHEN BRAKES ARE APPLIED. DEALER NOTIFIED. FEEL FREE TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION.*AK
CONSUMER WAS TRAVELING ABOUT 35MPH ON A SIDE STREET AND WAS MAKING A RIGHT TURN WHILE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF HER MADE A SUDDEN STOP. CONSUMER APPLIED BRAKES AND PEDAL WENT DOWN TO THE FLOOR. AND WAS HIT FROM BEHIND. *AK
FRONT BRAKES ROTORS WARPED AFTER 9700MPH ON BRAKES. BRAKES WERE REPLACED. *AK
THE FRONT BRAKE ROTORS FAILED PRIOR TO RECALL NOTICE 00V-136 THE CONSUMER REQUEST REIMBURSEMENT. NLM
WHEN BRAKING VEHICLE VIBRATES AND SHAKES BADLY, THERE IS ALSO A HUMMING SOUND. CONSUMER HAD ROTORS REPLACED, BUT PROBLEM STILL THERE. *AK
BATTERY FAILED. NLM
CONSUMER HAD BRAKE ROTORS REPAIRED PRIOR TO RECALL NOTICE 99V-340, DEALER STATED THEY WERE UNABLE TO ACCOMODATE CONSUMERS REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST BECAUSE THE REPAIR ORDER WHICH WAS SUBMITTED DID NOT SHOW A SEPARATION OF THE ROTOR FROM THE HUB. NLM
PRIOR TO RECALL 99V34, THE VEHICLE EXPERIENCED ROTOR PROBLEMS, THE CONSUMER FEELS THAT SHE SHOULD BE REIMBURSED FOR THE REPAIRS THAT WERE DONE PRIOR TO THE RECALL INCLUDING A FUEL PUMP THAT WENT BAD DUE TO THE VEHICLE NOT BEING DRIVEN BECAUSE OF THE FAULTY ROTORS. *SLC
WHILE TRYING TO SLOW DOWN ON DAMP ROAD, THE BRAKES LOCKED AND THE VEHICLE SPUN SEVERAL TIMES COLLIDING WITH ANOTHER VEHICLE CAUSING INJURY TO THE DRIVER. THE BRAKES LOCK IN ANY DAMP, WET OR SNOWY WEATHER. THERE WAS A RECALL ON BRAKES AND ROTORS, BUT GOT WORSE AFTER RECALL FIXING. *YH
CONSUMER EXPERIENCED RECLALL PROBLEMS BEFORE RECALL 99V34 AND WANTS REIMBURSEMENT. *SLC
RECALL # 99V340000 BRAKES:ROTORS: DEALERSHIP NEVER TOOK CARE OF RECALL CAMPAIGN, EVEN THOUGH CUSTOMER'S RECEIPT SHOWED WORK WAS PERFORMED. WHEN VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A PRIVATE MECHANIC TWO WEEKS LATER, ROTORS WERE REPLACED AT OWNER'S EXPENSE. DEALERSHIP WAS REFUSING TO REIMBURSE CUSTOMER FOR WORK. DEALER WANTED TO CHANGE ROTORS TO CHRYSLER ROTORS, BUT DID NOT COMPLETE THE CAMPAIGN THE FIRST TIME. *AK
VEHICLE EXPERIENCED FAILURE OF THE RECALL COMPONENT (99V-340) PRIOR TO RECALL NOTIFICATION, CONSUMER IS REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT. *MJS
FRONT DISC BRAKE ROTORS CAN EXPERIENCE SEVERE CORROSION IN EXTENSIVE PERIOD IN SALT ROADS. PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER INFORMATION. *AK
WHEN APPLYING BRAKES ROTORS ON THE LEFT SEPARATED FROM THE HUB. PROBLEM WAS REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER. OWNER HAS REPLACED BOTH FRONT ROTORS HIMSELF. **AK
BRAKES ARE VIBRATING AND VEHICLE IS TAKING TOO LONG TO COME TO A STOP. CONSUMER FEELS THERES NO SECURITY WITH BRAKES. *AK
FRONT BRAKE ROTORS FAILED PRIOR TO RECALL NOTICE , CONSUMER REQUEST REIMBURSEMENT FROM MANUFACTURER BUT THEY INDICATED THAT CONSUMER WAS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT BECAUSE OF THE WORDING THE MECHANIC USED TO DESCRIBE THE ROTORS CONDITION. NLM
FRONT BRAKE ROTORS FAILED PRIOR TO RECALL NOTICE 99V-340. NLM
VEHICLE EXPERIENCED FAILURE OF THE RECALL COMPONENT PRIOR TO NOTIFICATION AND IS BEING DENIED REIMBURSEMENT DUE TO INVOICE PROBLEMS. (99V-340) *MJS
WATER PUMP REPLACED. *MJS
VEHICLE HAS HAD CONTINUAL PROBLEMS WITH THE BRAKE SYSTEM, REPLACEMENT AND REPAIRS OF SEVERAL COMPONENTS PRIOR TO RECALL NOTIFICATION, CONSUMER IS HAVING PROBLEMS WITH DEALERSHIP REGARDING RECALL REPAIR. (99V-340) *MJS
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.
Categories with enough reports to have a page of their own
Data on this page last refreshed .