VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:CRUISE CONTROL
1996 Mazda B-Series Truck
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 55 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 1996 Mazda B-Series Truck, most frequently naming the visibility, tires & wheels and brakes categories. 2 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 90 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| May 1996 | 1 | 1 |
| Jun 1996 | 1 | 2 |
| Oct 1996 | 1 | 3 |
| Nov 1996 | 3 | 6 |
| Jan 1997 | 1 | 7 |
| Apr 1997 | 1 | 8 |
| Jul 1997 | 3 | 11 |
| Aug 1997 | 1 | 12 |
| Sep 1997 | 1 | 13 |
| Oct 1997 | 1 | 14 |
| Nov 1997 | 1 | 15 |
| Dec 1997 | 1 | 16 |
| Jan 1998 | 1 | 17 |
| May 1998 | 2 | 19 |
| Aug 1998 | 1 | 20 |
| Sep 1998 | 2 | 22 |
| Oct 1998 | 1 | 23 |
| Dec 1998 | 1 | 24 |
| Jun 1999 | 2 | 26 |
| Jul 1999 | 1 | 27 |
| Dec 1999 | 1 | 28 |
| Jan 2000 | 1 | 29 |
| Feb 2000 | 1 | 30 |
| Apr 2000 | 1 | 31 |
| Aug 2000 | 2 | 33 |
| Sep 2000 | 3 | 36 |
| Oct 2000 | 2 | 38 |
| Dec 2000 | 2 | 40 |
| Jan 2001 | 1 | 41 |
| Aug 2001 | 2 | 43 |
| Feb 2002 | 3 | 46 |
| Jun 2003 | 2 | 48 |
| Jun 2004 | 1 | 49 |
| May 2005 | 1 | 50 |
| Jan 2006 | 1 | 51 |
| Aug 2007 | 1 | 52 |
| May 2013 | 1 | 53 |
| May 2015 | 1 | 54 |
| Dec 2015 | 1 | 55 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Visibility1320.6%
- Tires & wheels711.1%
- Brakes69.5%
- Seat belts57.9%
- Steering57.9%
- Driver assistance57.9%
- Suspension46.3%
- Airbags34.8%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
2 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govTIRES:TREAD/BELT
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
LIKE MANY OTHERS WIPERS WERE WORKING INTERMITTENTLY ONLY TO STOP WORKING COMPLETELY REPLACED SWITCH TO NO AVAIL. HAVE RED ITS A PROBLEM WITH THE GENERAL ELECTRIC MODULE WITH TRY REPLACING THAT NEXT!
- NHTSA ID
- 10807868
- Incident
- Oct 29, 2015
- Mileage
- 180,000 mi
FRAME IS COMPLETELY RUSTED/ CRACKED / HOLES / ROTTEN FROM RUST
- NHTSA ID
- 10715641
- Incident
- May 1, 2014
- Mileage
- 140,000 mi
FRAME IS CRACKED AND HAS HOLES FROM RUST. SPRING SHACKLES HAVE HOLES FROM RUST. WILL NOT PASS INSPECTION WITHOUT NEW FRAME OR MAJOR FRAME REPAIR. *TR
- NHTSA ID
- 10510417
- Incident
- Apr 1, 2013
- Mileage
- 150,000 mi
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1996 MAZDA B4000. THE CONTACT NOTICED A GAS LEAK WHILE FILLING THE VEHICLE WITH GAS UP TO THE FILLING NECK. THIS LEAKAGE HAS OCCURRED TWICE BEFORE. HE HAS NOT TAKEN THE VEHICLE TO THE MECHANIC. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 145,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 10199409
- Incident
- Aug 11, 2007
- Mileage
- 145,000 mi
CRUISE CONTROL CAME ON WITHOUT TURNING IT ON AND WOULD NOT TURN OFF. I PULLED TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD AND DISABLED IT UNDER THE HOOD. *AK
- NHTSA ID
- 10148898
- Incident
- Aug 10, 2002
- Mileage
- 102,000 mi
DT: GAS WAS LEAKING FROM THE TOP OF THE TANK. THE CONSUMER JUST BOUGHT THE TRUCK A WEEK AGO AND THE GAS TANK STARTED LEAKING ON MAY 5-16-05. THE CONSUMER TOOK THE TRUCK TO A MECHANIC ON 5-16-05 AND THE MECHANIC TOLD THE CONSUMER THAT THE GAS TANK LOOKED DEFECTIVE. THIS IS TO BE FIXED ON FRIDAY MAY 20, 2005. THE CONSUMER IS NOT DRIVING THE VEHICLE AT THIS TIME. THE MECHANIC SAID HE WOULD HAVE TO DROP THE TANK AND TRY AND SEE IF THE WHOLE TANK WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED. *JB
- NHTSA ID
- 10121154
- Incident
- May 16, 2005
- Mileage
- 122,300 mi
CONSUMER CHECKED THE BRAKES, AND FOUND THAT THE BRAKES ROTORS ON THE 2 FRONT WHEELS WERE CRACKED. HE TOOK VEHICLE TO THE DEALER, BUT WANTED TO KNOW IF THERE WERE ANY RECALLS ON THEM.*AK
- NHTSA ID
- 10075510
- Incident
- Jun 1, 2004
METAL BRAKE LINE FAILED IN ENGINE COMPARTMENT LEADING TO A COMPLETE LOSS OF ALL BRAKE FLUID AND BRAKING. ONE BRAKE LINE CORRODED THROUGH, ANOTHER LINE WAS SEVERELY CORRODED, AND THE 3RD LINE IS JUST STARTING TO CORRODE. THERE WAS NO WARNING OF ANY PROBLEM. *JB
- NHTSA ID
- 10023679
- Incident
- Jun 21, 2003
- Mileage
- 48,500 mi
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; EQUIPMENT
In accordance with Federal regulations, follow the procedure listed below when replacing a speedometer. NOTE: Tampering with a motor vehicle odometer is strictly prohibited by Federal, and State laws. It is the dealerâÂÂs responsibility to comply with Federal, State, and local laws concerning odometer and related documentation requirements when providing a repair or replacement. ï· Mazda vehicles are manufactured with tamper-proof speedometers. ï· When a speedometer is replaced, the new speedometer will read zero (0) miles. ï· This procedure is extremely important to accurately represent actual vehicle mileage. ï· Prior to speedometer removal, complete the information required on the âÂÂSpeedometer Replacement LabelâÂÂ. Labels can only be ordered through Mazda eStore. ï· In an effort to achieve a higher level of Customer Experience and retain the value of MazdaâÂÂs vehicles, MNAO Warranty Operations is allowing all Mazda dealers to utilize a third party, SPECMO Enterprises, Inc., for Instrument Panel Cluster (IPC) odometer setting service. With the use of SPECMOâÂÂs services, it is possible that the odometer will be set between 10 to 31 miles over the odometer mileage at the time of replacement for both warranty and customer pay repairs. Please make sure that the customer is aware that there may be a slight variance to the odometer, in which case the customer may have to accept the slightly higher mileage. Since odometer setting service is not part of the warranty repair, it is not warrantable nor required, but optional. However, Mazda Warranty policy provides after- warranty assistance (AWA) or DSA that can be utilized to cover this service expense.
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING; EQUIPMENT; FUEL SYSTEM, DIESEL:STORAGE:TANK ASSEMBLY; FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
In support of the new MRT distribution, Mazda will ship to dealers a new Dual Purpose Diagnostic Leak Detector beginning March, 2019. Training videos will be posted to MGSS shortly and Workshop Manual procedures will be revised gradually.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: INSTRUMENT CLUSTER/PANEL
In accordance with Federal regulations, follow the procedure listed below when replacing a speedometer. NOTE: Tampering with a motor vehicle odometer is strictly prohibited by Federal, and State laws. It is the dealer's responsibility to comply with Federal, State, and local laws concerning odometer and related documentation requirements when providing a repair or replacement. Mazda vehicles are manufactured with tamper-proof speedometers. When a speedometer is replaced, the new speedometer will read zero (0) miles. This procedure is extremely important to accurately represent actual vehicle mileage. Prior to speedometer removal, complete the information required on the "Speedometer Replacement Label". Labels can only be ordered through Mazda eStore. In an effort to achieve a higher level of Customer Experience and retain the value of Mazda's vehicles, MNAO Warranty Operations is allowing all Mazda dealers to utilize a third party, SPECMO Enterprises, Inc., for Instrument Panel Cluster (IPC) odometer setting service. With the use of SPECMO's services, it is possible that the odometer will be set between 10 to 31 miles over the odometer mileage at the time of replacement for both warranty and customer pay repairs. Please make sure that the customer is aware that there may be a slight variance to the odometer, in which case the customer may have to accept the slightly higher mileage. Since odometer setting service is not part of the warranty repair, it is not warrantable nor required, but optional. However, Mazda Warranty policy provides after-warranty assistance (AWA) or DSA that can be utilized to cover this service expense.
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
On some vehicles, a sulfur smell or 'rotten egg' odor may be noticed coming from the exhaust system. The odor is usually noticed after a cold start, fast idle, extended periods of idling and full throttle acceleration. Sulfur smell is not an indication of an engine concern and will not cause reduced driveability or durability of the engine or any of its emission components. The sulfur smell or 'rotten egg' odor is caused by high amounts of sulfur in the gasoline being used in the vehicle. Sulfur is normally eliminated during the refining process, but the EPA regulation of sulfur in gasoline differs from state to state. Vehicles using fuel containing high amounts of sulfur will most likely emit sulfur smell from the exhaust system.When high sulfur fuel is burned, there is a chemical reaction in the catalytic converter causing the sulfur tooxidize. As the vehicle is driven, the oxidizing reaction odor in the converter will decrease with mileage and age.
EQUIPMENT ADAPTIVE/MOBILITY
This service bulletin provides information regarding the proper use of the driver's floor mat to avoid anypotential interference with the foot pedals. The following are possible causes of floor mat interference,which can be avoided with proper usage. Floor mat moves forward due to improper installation. Inappropriate floor mat (such as aftermarket, non-factory-equipped, or non-genuine) is used. Floor mat is stacked one on top of another.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
The Mazda GR8-1291 is required for all warranty battery testing. If the Mazda GR8-1291 is not used, incorrect battery testing may result in unnecessary battery replacement. Use the following test procedures in this Service Bulletin to test Mazda vehicle batteries and to generate a Warranty Code. NOTE: A Warranty Code is required for warranty claim submission Battery Identification (Mazda batteries have 2 rating types) 1. JIS (Japanese Industrial Standard): JIS codes are six-digit alpha-numeric markings molded into the top of the battery to identify a battery by the capacity (amps), dimensions, and battery terminal type. Vehicles manufactured in Japan come from the factory with a JIS rated battery. NOTE: Replacement batteries may use a CCA rating. If so, use the CCA rating listed on the battery. 2. CCA (Cold Cranking Amps):CCA ratings are normally located on a sticker affixed to the top of the battery to indicate a battery's Cold Cranking Amps. CCA rated batteries are supplied with domestically produced vehicles. NOTE: If an incorrect CCA rating is entered into the Mazda GR8-1291, it will result in a false result and invalid Warranty Code from the tester. This will also result in unnecessary replacement of batteries.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 4 | 5 | 0 | — |
| 2008 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 55.3 |
| 2007 | 37 | 3 | 0 | 50.2 |
| 2006 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 43.2 |
| 2005 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 59.3 |
| 2004 | 24 | 3 | 3 | 61.9 |
| 2003 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 50.9 |
| 2002 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 50.3 |
| 2001 | 37 | 3 | 0 | 45.1 |
| 2000 | 58 | 3 | 0 | 52.3 |
| 1999 | 78 | 4 | 0 | 53.6 |
| 1998 | 67 | 5 | 0 | 50.7 |
| 1997 | 52 | 2 | 0 | 47.9 |
| 1996Viewing | 55 | 2 | 0 | 44.2 |
| 1995 | 42 | 2 | 0 | 52.0 |
| 1994 | 122 | 6 | 3 | 60.1 |
| 1993 | 9 | 2 | 1 | — |
| 1992 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 61.2 |
| 1991 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 63.2 |
| 1990 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 46.6 |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.