SEAT BELTS:CRITICAL FASTENERS
2023 Chevrolet Colorado
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 130 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2023 Chevrolet Colorado, most frequently naming the driver assistance, electrical and brakes categories. 3 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 629 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2023 | 1 | 1 |
| Jul 2023 | 2 | 3 |
| Aug 2023 | 4 | 7 |
| Sep 2023 | 4 | 11 |
| Oct 2023 | 4 | 15 |
| Nov 2023 | 6 | 21 |
| Dec 2023 | 5 | 26 |
| Jan 2024 | 3 | 29 |
| Feb 2024 | 8 | 37 |
| Mar 2024 | 4 | 41 |
| Apr 2024 | 4 | 45 |
| May 2024 | 4 | 49 |
| Jun 2024 | 2 | 51 |
| Jul 2024 | 1 | 52 |
| Aug 2024 | 4 | 56 |
| Sep 2024 | 3 | 59 |
| Oct 2024 | 1 | 60 |
| Nov 2024 | 4 | 64 |
| Dec 2024 | 4 | 68 |
| Jan 2025 | 4 | 72 |
| Feb 2025 | 3 | 75 |
| Mar 2025 | 3 | 78 |
| Apr 2025 | 3 | 81 |
| May 2025 | 5 | 86 |
| Jun 2025 | 5 | 91 |
| Jul 2025 | 2 | 93 |
| Aug 2025 | 4 | 97 |
| Oct 2025 | 4 | 101 |
| Nov 2025 | 1 | 102 |
| Dec 2025 | 3 | 105 |
| Jan 2026 | 4 | 109 |
| Feb 2026 | 6 | 115 |
| Mar 2026 | 2 | 117 |
| Apr 2026 | 4 | 121 |
| May 2026 | 5 | 126 |
| Jun 2026 | 3 | 129 |
| Jul 2026 | 1 | 130 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Driver assistance6134.5%
- Electrical3922.0%
- Brakes2413.6%
- Engine2011.3%
- Powertrain (other)95.1%
- Exterior lighting84.5%
- Steering63.4%
- Fuel system52.8%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
3 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govWHEELS:LUGS/NUTS/BOLTS/STUDS
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:ADAS:DRIVER MONITORING:CAMERA/SENSOR; FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY BRAKING
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
My 2023 Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 cannot receive over‑the‑air (OTA) software updates because the gateway module is still running outdated firmware (XXX.mnf). General Motors issued Service Update XXX to correct this defect by performing a vehicle‑wide programming update. However, GM’s system incorrectly shows the bulletin as “closed” for my VIN even though the gateway module was never updated. The truck was sold to me by Tyrell Chevrolet in [XXX] with this safety‑related service update not completed properly. The dealership has confirmed they cannot perform the required update because GM’s system will not authorize it until the bulletin is reopened. GM corporate has been contacted multiple times, but after several days they have not reopened the bulletin or provided a resolution. Because the gateway module remains on outdated firmware, the vehicle cannot receive critical OTA updates related to safety, diagnostics, and module stability. This condition has been reported by other 2023 Colorado owners and has previously been associated with battery‑drain issues caused by software modules failing to sleep properly. GM has acknowledged the defect by issuing Service Update XXX, but they are refusing to reopen the update for my VIN despite the incomplete firmware and the vehicle’s inability to receive OTA updates. I am filing this complaint so the defect and GM’s refusal to correct it are formally documented. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11749540
- Incident
- Jul 10, 2026
On May 15, 2026, my 2023 Chevrolet Colorado (2.7L L3B turbocharged engine, approximately 49,000 miles) lost its entire engine oil charge while in normal operation, and at NO point did the low-oil-pressure warning light illuminate to alert me. While driving, a loud buzzing/vibrating noise developed near the upper engine and the center dash area. The vehicle continued to run with no oil-pressure warning of any kind — no low-oil-pressure light and no audible oil-pressure chime. Concerned by the noise, I immediately pulled into a parking lot and checked under the hood. The engine oil dipstick was completely dry, showing no oil whatsoever. I added 3 quarts of oil and the dipstick still showed no reading, indicating the engine had been operating with a critically low or empty oil level. Throughout this entire event, no oil-pressure warning activated. There was no external oil leak, no puddle where the vehicle is normally parked, and no oil in the coolant reservoir, which suggests the oil was being consumed or lost internally rather than dripping out — a condition the driver cannot see or anticipate without a functioning warning system. Drivers depend entirely on the oil-pressure warning system to alert them before oil starvation causes catastrophic engine damage or sudden engine seizure. An engine that seizes without warning while the vehicle is in motion creates an immediate and severe crash risk — sudden loss of motive power in traffic, on a highway, or in an intersection. The complete failure of this warning system to illuminate during a total loss of oil is, by itself, a safety defect independent of whatever is causing the oil loss, because it removes the driver's only opportunity to stop the vehicle safely before failure. These symptoms also align with existing GM service documentation: TSB 25-NA-309 addresses high idle, oil consumption, oil leaks, and MIL illumination caused by internal failure of the PCV oil separator, and service campaign N232415060 addresses a
- NHTSA ID
- 11744040
- Incident
- May 15, 2026
My 2023 Chevrolet Colorado (2.7L, approx. 49,000 miles) experiences sudden, intermittent loss of motive power involving the 8-speed automatic transmission. The transmission sets codes and the vehicle drops into limp mode, capped at roughly 45 mph, without warning. The most dangerous symptom is a total loss of acceleration from a stop, especially on inclines — pressing the accelerator produces no response. On one occasion, stopped on a slight incline, the vehicle rolled backward toward the car behind me when it failed to move forward on accelerator input. I narrowly avoided a collision. On a separate occasion, after pressing the accelerator with no response, the vehicle then suddenly lurched forward into cross traffic; repeated presses produced inconsistent, delayed engagement, nearly causing a collision. To climb inclines I now have to hold the brake while applying throttle and slowly release the brake to prevent rollback. These are unpredictable loss-of-control events that create a serious crash risk in traffic. I believe this relates to a known issue affecting the GM 8-speed automatic transmission. The vehicle is currently at a GM dealer and I have an open GM Customer Care case. No crash, fire, or injury has occurred yet, but two near-collisions have.
- NHTSA ID
- 11744039
- Incident
- Feb 1, 2026
Failed upper radiator hose.
- NHTSA ID
- 11743322
- Incident
- Jun 10, 2026
The blind spot indicator on my truck activates randomly without any vehicle present, and I reported this issue immediately after purchasing it. Despite bringing the truck to Boyd Chevrolet in Henderson, NC multiple times, I am repeatedly told they “can’t duplicate the problem” and therefore cannot repair it. Their only explanation has been that “maybe a future software update will fix it.” No components have ever been replaced to rule out a defective part, and I have no indication that Boyd Chevrolet has escalated the issue to Chevrolet, or anyone else, for further guidance. After nearly three years and 30,000 miles, the problem remains completely unaddressed while my warranty is nearing expiration. This is not a minor inconvenience — it is a serious safety hazard. On several occasions, I have begun changing lanes only for the blind spot indicator to suddenly illuminate, causing me to jerk the wheel to avoid a car that isn’t there. The unexpected false alerts create a dangerous overreaction that puts me and others at risk. I want my truck properly diagnosed and repaired, but I have been unable to find a solution through the dealership. I have detailed service records documenting every visit and every time I reported this issue. At this point, I need meaningful action taken to resolve this ongoing safety concern.
- NHTSA ID
- 11740714
- Incident
- Jul 24, 2023
My truck has used automatic emergency braking multiple times while driving at variable speeds with no obstacles or vehicles in front of me causing whiplash and further damage to my neck that has 5 budging discs. Since I’m only allowed to add a specific mileage and speed below, I’ll note here that it’s happened since I purchased the truck with roughly 35000 miles on it to the current mileage of 44000 and between speeds of 30mph-75mph.
- NHTSA ID
- 11739365
- Incident
- May 20, 2026
My 2023 Chevy Colorado developed a rear brake squeal when backing up at approximately 20,000 miles. The dealer found nothing wrong at my next appointment. By 30,000 miles, the rear pads and rotors required replacement, at partial cost to me. The new rear brakes are already squealing again after just a few thousand miles. This isn't an isolated issue. A Chevy Colorado forum I follow has documented multiple owners experiencing the same pattern: rear brake squealing beginning around 20,000 miles, followed by premature pad and rotor failure shortly after. Notably, front brake wear is normal across all reported cases, including my own, pointing directly to a rear-specific defect rather than general driving habits or conditions. The rear brakes on the 2023 Chevy Colorado appear to be failing well ahead of any reasonable service interval, and the consistency of this pattern across multiple owners strongly suggests a systemic problem.
- NHTSA ID
- 11739233
- Incident
- Mar 16, 2026
Engine light came on. Fan ran high. Had it towed to the dealership. Has 39,000 miles on it. Needs a new upper radiator hose due to a defective hose. Apparently, after reading online, GM is aware of this issue. Now we have to pay the diagnostic fee and $850 for a new hose and a flush, as well as the tow bill! Now can’t get the part for a week or 8 days and then have to wait on the repair. This is unsatisfactory that there is a known problem and isn’t covered or hasn’t been a recall.
- NHTSA ID
- 11738638
- Incident
- May 18, 2026
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
Certain vehicles may experience reduced or intermittent Telematics Control Module functionality. Dealers are to reprogram the Telematic Control Module to the latest software level.
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
General Motors has decided to conduct a Voluntary Emission Recall. Certain vehicles may have a condition which can cause the fuel pump power control module to fail. If this were to occur, fuel flow to the engine could be interrupted. Dealers will replace the fuel pump power control module.
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
Certain vehicles may have a condition in which the Engine Control Module (ECM) does not sufficiently control fuel injector flow rate under certain driving conditions. Dealers are to reprogram the ECM.
This document assists GM dealer technicians with diagnosing torque converter concerns to ensure torque converter replacement is necessary. The torque converter part number will be placed on order restriction, and the technician will be asked to follow 25-NA-148 before requesting a part through PQC.
This Preliminary information communicates an issue with the SES MIL and DTC P062B and engineering is currently investigating.
This PI communicates diagnostic information to assist Technicians with a possible transmission shudder
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 43.4 |
| 2025 | 27 | 1 | 0 | 49.6 |
| 2024 | 114 | 3 | 0 | 57.8 |
| 2023Viewing | 130 | 3 | 0 | 53.9 |
| 2022 | 49 | 1 | 0 | 47.5 |
| 2021 | 71 | 1 | 0 | 53.3 |
| 2020 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 44.7 |
| 2019 | 146 | 0 | 0 | 43.6 |
| 2018 | 180 | 1 | 0 | 43.2 |
| 2017 | 215 | 1 | 0 | 45.3 |
| 2016 | 695 | 4 | 0 | 55.0 |
| 2015 | 485 | 7 | 1 | 60.2 |
| 2014 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2013 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2012 | 42 | 2 | 0 | 51.1 |
| 2011 | 42 | 5 | 0 | 50.4 |
| 2010 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 41.4 |
| 2009 | 67 | 3 | 0 | 48.6 |
| 2008 | 81 | 2 | 0 | 51.7 |
| 2007 | 140 | 3 | 0 | 50.1 |
| 2006 | 236 | 4 | 1 | 49.9 |
| 2005 | 356 | 3 | 2 | 58.4 |
| 2004 | 361 | 3 | 2 | 55.9 |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.