AIR BAGS:FRONTAL:PASSENGER SIDE:INFLATOR MODULE
2015 Dodge Charger
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
NHTSA has issued a “do not drive” advisory affecting this model year.
Campaign 19V018000. Confirm whether your specific vehicle is covered using its VIN before acting on this.
Check your VIN on NHTSA.govOverview
Our database contains 135 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2015 Dodge Charger, most frequently naming the powertrain (other), engine and electrical categories. 8 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; 2 NHTSA investigations name it; and 328 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2018 | 3 | 42 |
| Sep 2018 | 5 | 47 |
| Nov 2018 | 1 | 48 |
| Dec 2018 | 2 | 50 |
| Jan 2019 | 2 | 52 |
| Feb 2019 | 1 | 53 |
| Mar 2019 | 1 | 54 |
| Apr 2019 | 5 | 59 |
| May 2019 | 3 | 62 |
| Jun 2019 | 2 | 64 |
| Jul 2019 | 2 | 66 |
| Aug 2019 | 1 | 67 |
| Sep 2019 | 1 | 68 |
| Oct 2019 | 3 | 71 |
| Nov 2019 | 5 | 76 |
| Jan 2020 | 1 | 77 |
| Feb 2020 | 2 | 79 |
| Mar 2020 | 2 | 81 |
| Apr 2020 | 1 | 82 |
| May 2020 | 2 | 84 |
| Jun 2020 | 2 | 86 |
| Aug 2020 | 1 | 87 |
| Sep 2020 | 2 | 89 |
| Oct 2020 | 3 | 92 |
| Nov 2020 | 1 | 93 |
| Dec 2020 | 2 | 95 |
| Mar 2021 | 1 | 96 |
| Jun 2021 | 3 | 99 |
| Jul 2021 | 1 | 100 |
| Aug 2021 | 1 | 101 |
| Oct 2021 | 1 | 102 |
| Nov 2021 | 1 | 103 |
| Jan 2022 | 1 | 104 |
| Feb 2022 | 1 | 105 |
| Mar 2022 | 1 | 106 |
| Apr 2022 | 1 | 107 |
| May 2022 | 2 | 109 |
| Jul 2022 | 1 | 110 |
| Sep 2022 | 1 | 111 |
| Dec 2022 | 1 | 112 |
| Feb 2023 | 1 | 113 |
| Jun 2023 | 1 | 114 |
| Aug 2023 | 1 | 115 |
| Oct 2023 | 1 | 116 |
| Nov 2023 | 1 | 117 |
| Apr 2024 | 1 | 118 |
| Jun 2024 | 1 | 119 |
| Jul 2024 | 2 | 121 |
| Aug 2024 | 1 | 122 |
| Sep 2024 | 2 | 124 |
| Oct 2024 | 1 | 125 |
| Dec 2024 | 1 | 126 |
| Feb 2025 | 2 | 128 |
| Mar 2025 | 1 | 129 |
| Jun 2025 | 1 | 130 |
| Aug 2025 | 1 | 131 |
| Oct 2025 | 1 | 132 |
| Mar 2026 | 1 | 133 |
| Apr 2026 | 1 | 134 |
| Jul 2026 | 1 | 135 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Powertrain (other)3118.1%
- Engine2414.0%
- Electrical2212.9%
- Driver assistance179.9%
- Brakes158.8%
- Steering137.6%
- Airbags127.0%
- Exterior lighting116.4%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
8 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govPOWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION:CONTROL MODULE (TCM/PCM/TECM)
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:SOFTWARE; ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:WIRING; VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:CRUISE CONTROL
Safety investigations
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture
From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.
Software security vulnerability
On July 23, 2015, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) launched Safety Recall 15V-461 to remedy security vulnerabilities in approximately 1.4 million model year (MY) 2013 through 2015 vehicles equipped with Uconnect head units (HU) 8.4A (RA3 radio) and 8.4AN (RA4 radio) manufactured by Harman International.On July 24, 2015, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Recall Query, RQ 15-004, to investigate HU security vulnerabilities and remedy effectiveness in the recalled population and to determine whether similar units have been supplied for use in other FCA vehicles.In an August 11, 2015 letter, FCA submitted a second Part 573 safety recall report expanding the scope of the Uconnect RA4 model radio to include additional 7,810 MY 2015 Jeep Renegade vehicles manufactured from September 18, 2014 through June 25, 2015 (Recall 15V-508).Scope analysis indicated that Uconnect radios installed in FCA vehicles not included in recalls 15V-461 or 15V-508 (subject recalls) are not equipped with built-in cellular access or short range wireless communication features and, thus, do not contain the security vulnerabilities addressed by the subject recalls. SUBJECT VEHICLES: MY2014 through 2015 Dodge Durango, Jeep Grand Cherokee and Jeep Cherokee sport utility vehicles; MY2013 through 2015 Ram 1500, 2500, 3500 and 4500/5500 pickup trucks; MY2013 through 2015 Dodge Viper vehicles; and MY2015 Chrysler 200, 300, Jeep Renegade, Dodge Charger and Challenger vehicles.According to FCA, long and short range wireless vulnerabilities identified in the recalled vehicles could allow unauthorized third-party access to, and manipulation of, networked vehicle control systems.Successful exploitation of the vulnerabilities, coupled with reverse engineering of networked microprocessor control modules, could result in unauthorized manipulation of vehicle control systems. This unauthorized manipulation of vehicle controls and systems could expose the driver, vehicle occupants or other highway users to an increased risk of injury.FCA and its network provider, Sprint, conducted a nationwide campaign to block access to a radio communications port that was unintentionally left open.On July 27, 2015, short range wireless vulnerabilities were also blocked.Finally, third party security evaluation and regression testing identified vulnerabilities that were either remedied by Sprint or through updates to the FCA Uconnect software.ODI identified a total of 30 complaints or field reports on unique vehicles submitted by FCA (29) or received by NHTSA (1) alleging incidents of theft from a vehicle or anomalous performance that the owner alleged were caused by, or may have been caused by, remote hacking.Twenty-six (87%) of these reports were submitted after a magazine article was published on July 21, 2015, describing the remote hacking of an FCA vehicle by researchers who were able to affect the operation of various vehicle control systems, including the service brakes, steering, throttle and ignition.Most of the complaints involved vehicle systems that were not safety critical (e.g., complaints related to radio, navigation system, or air-conditioning control) and did not affect vehicle control.Three complaints reported engine stalls.One owner reported sudden unintended acceleration allegedly related to hacking.None of the complaints or field reports reviewed involved the steering and braking vehicle control effects demonstrated by the research hackers prior to the recall.There were no confirmed incidents of hacking in any of the records reviewed by ODI.The remedies completed by Sprint and FCA appear to have eliminated vulnerabilities that mi
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
I have had this car since 2018 when I purchased it the radio was shutting itself off and turning back on every 30 seconds I replaced it with a new one same radio and since then I have had issues with volume control it’s turning up by itself, even with the speed of adjustment control off the knobs for my ac and all those other buttons work when they want to sometimes my park sense beeps for almost a minute after I put it in drive sometimes it doesn’t beep at all and sometimes it randomly starts beeping when I’m driving the tire pressure sensor lights on my dash say I’m low when I’m not had tire sensors checked there working fine I’ve had problems since I bought it took it dealership idk how many times they can’t find out what’s wrong and my radio is turning off and on I can’t see my controls for my ac I have [XXX] and [XXX] old and the heat turns on driving down the road I believe the center stack might be the problem INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11747843
- Incident
- Jun 30, 2026
The contact owns a 2015 Dodge Charger. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, the vehicle was idling roughly, and there was a ticking sound coming from the vehicle. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact stated that the vehicle hesitated while attempting to accelerate. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic, where it was diagnosed that the camshaft had failed and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The vehicle was then taken to the dealer, where it was also diagnosed that the camshaft had failed and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact was informed that this was a known issue and that several vehicles had been taken to the dealer for the same failure. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure, and a case was opened. The approximate failure mileage was 131,300.
- NHTSA ID
- 11728919
- Incident
- Apr 2, 2026
- Mileage
- 131,300 mi
The dealership has refused to provide documentation for the pre-purchase inspection and the post-inspection report, and they declared the vehicle a total loss. My husband was driving and made a left turn, and the front right tire and control arm came completely off the car. As a result, significant damage was sustained to the car's underside, and it was not immediately visible when the dealership/auto body repair shop received the car. They delayed explaining to my insurance company that the vehicle was totaled and claimed there was a delay due to a technician being terminated.
- NHTSA ID
- 11724201
- Incident
- Mar 1, 2025
Odometer Fraud. The contact purchased a 2015 Dodge Charger. The contact stated that upon taking the vehicle to an independent mechanic for service, the mechanic plugged the computer to the ECU and discovered that there was an odometer and ECU mileage discrepancy. The vehicle was a dealer sale. At the time of purchase, the vehicle mileage was 123,927, and it was later discovered that the mileage was 248,968.
- NHTSA ID
- 11691785
- Incident
- Jan 26, 2024
- Mileage
- 248,968 mi
The contact owns a 2015 Dodge Charger. The contact stated that while driving at various speeds, an abnormal sound was heard coming from under the engine. No warning light was illuminated. The vehicle was taken to a local dealer, where it was diagnosed; however, the diagnosis was unavailable. The vehicle was taken to a local independent mechanic, where it was diagnosed as needing a front drive shaft replacement. The vehicle was previously repaired for the front passenger side bearing, and the other unknown repairs were made; however, the failure reoccurred. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 59,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11678857
- Incident
- Jun 15, 2025
- Mileage
- 59,000 mi
Steering wheel is hard to turn.
- NHTSA ID
- 11669126
- Incident
- Oct 13, 2024
The gear shift, camshaft. Have to keep taking it back for repairs after having repairs done on car.
- NHTSA ID
- 11650729
- Incident
- May 22, 2022
Leaks fuel from top of fuel pump when parked, car full of gas fumes. It poses an immediate threat to my safety and my children. No warning lamp
- NHTSA ID
- 11645220
- Incident
- Feb 6, 2025
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
POWER TRAIN
The vehicle will exhibit a service transmission/check engine warning indicator for the following transmission models: 845RE, 8HP45, 850RE, 8HP50, 8HP70, 8HP75, 8HP75-PHEV, 8HP75-LCV, 8HP90, 8HP95. Transmissions may exhibit the following diagnostic codes: P07E4, P1DB2, P0716, P1B14, P0733, P1D90, P1DB7, P1B13.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Active Diagnostic Trouble Code (DTC) B1A10-00, B1A11-00, B1A12- 00, B1A13-00-, B1A14-00, B1A15-00, B1A16-00, and B1A17-00 in The Radio Frequency Hub (RFH)
SERVICE BRAKES
PAD KIT - REAR DISC BRAKE, FRONT DISC BRAKE
SERVICE BRAKES
PAD KIT - REAR DISC BRAKE, FRONT DISC BRAKE
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Decreased Remote Start And RKE Range. Tire Pressure Sensors Values Are Not Displayed
AIR BAGS
AIR BAG - SIDE CURTAIN
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2023 | 26 | 2 | 0 | 59.4 |
| 2022 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 65.0 |
| 2021 | 32 | 2 | 0 | 51.5 |
| 2020 | 57 | 3 | 0 | 63.8 |
| 2019 | 120 | 5 | 1 | 61.6 |
| 2018 | 122 | 6 | 1 | 55.1 |
| 2017 | 127 | 4 | 1 | 55.1 |
| 2016 | 182 | 6 | 1 | 58.7 |
| 2015Viewing | 135 | 8 | 2 | 59.6 |
| 2014 | 343 | 10 | 2 | 63.9 |
| 2013 | 359 | 8 | 2 | 62.4 |
| 2012 | 648 | 14 | 3 | 64.1 |
| 2011 | 694 | 11 | 2 | 63.6 |
| 2010 | 232 | 6 | 1 | 58.2 |
| 2009 | 174 | 6 | 2 | 57.2 |
| 2008 | 609 | 5 | 2 | 58.8 |
| 2007 | 554 | 5 | 4 | 58.6 |
| 2006 | 1,293 | 5 | 4 | 55.9 |
| 2005 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| 2001 | 3 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1987 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — |
| 1986 | 0 | 3 | 1 | — |
| 1985 | 2 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1984 | 1 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1983 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1978 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1977 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1976 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1975 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1974 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1973 | 0 | 7 | 0 | — |
| 1972 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1971 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — |
| 1970 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1968 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — |
| 1967 | 0 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1966 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.