BACK OVER PREVENTION: SENSING SYSTEM: CAMERA
2026 Jeep Compass
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 4 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2026 Jeep Compass, most frequently naming the driver assistance, electrical and brakes categories. 1 safety recall has been issued covering this model year; and 141 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| May 2026 | 1 | 1 |
| Jul 2026 | 1 | 2 |
| Aug 2026 | 1 | 3 |
| Sep 2026 | 1 | 4 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Driver assistance342.9%
- Electrical228.6%
- Brakes114.3%
- Fuel system114.3%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
1 campaign cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govRecent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
The contact owns a 2026 Jeep Compass. The contact stated that after releasing the parking brake and attempting to drive the vehicle, the accelerator pedal was depressed; however, the vehicle failed to immediately respond. The vehicle hesitated before suddenly driving forward. The contact stated that the failure occurred while driving forward and while attempting to reverse. During one failure, the vehicle almost struck a pedestrian. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer on several occasions, but the dealer could not determine the cause of the failure. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 2,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11763625
- Incident
- Apr 1, 2026
- Mileage
- 2,000 mi
Safety defects: Forward collision braking system indicates OFF while driving automatic emergency braking unavailable related lane assistance failure history. This is intermittent safety system disablement. Fuel system: Fuel level gauge inaccurate. Gauge indicated almost empty, then after 81 miles of driving indicated half tank before refuel gauge increased while driving, should decrease. Risk of being stranded due to false reading. Vehicle was driven 81 miles from indicated empty to indicated half. Fuel consumption / range: Full-to-full test documented 81 miles driven between two complete fills second fill required 5.807 gallons calculated 13.95 MPG versus expected EPA rating of approximately 27/32 MPG. Range after full fill measured only 224.9 miles, then 206.9 miles on next full fill, versus expected approximately 364 miles for full tank. Range decreased 18 miles in 9 days despite full fills. Indicates excessive consumption. Parked fuel loss: While parked with odometer unchanged, indicated range decreased from 179 miles to 162.8 miles loss of 16.2 miles while vehicle not moving. Suggests possible evaporative system leak or fuel leak potential fire and stall hazard. Additional finding: While at dealer service since August 25 for same existing problems, technician identified additional gear seal / transmission seal leak repair order pending risk of loss of motive power. Request investigation for fuel level sender, fuel trim, evaporative system, forward collision system, and transmission seal leak.
- NHTSA ID
- 11760440
- Incident
- Jul 30, 2026
There are major software issues. The vehicle brakes unexpectedly. It is completely random and extremely dangerous. The satellite radio content is altered with the use of A.I. . It is similar to Deepfake scam. I can scan the network and send logs if needed.
- NHTSA ID
- 11749241
- Incident
- Jul 9, 2026
While cruising at 36mph, we decided to initiate the cruise control. Upon reaching a slow-down traffic ahead, the brakes were applied to slow the vehicle, however the cruise control did not disengage and the brakes did not stop the vehicle. The brakes were pressed three times and still the car could not stop. We were in a two-lane road with an opposite direction lane on the other side of the grassy median. We saw an opening in between the stopped vehicles and crossed over from right to left lane into the grassy median, hit a ditch, and did a sharp turn into opposing traffic, almost hitting another vehicle as they moved out of way, and stopped the vehicle on the opposite side of the road. When the vehicle hit the ditch crossing the median, the right front tire popped and helped in stopping the vehicle. Four family members including myself were in the vehicle and there were several cars already stopped in the lanes. This incident caused great safety concerns for my family and the vehicles around us. Had we hit the cars while crossing over, it would have caused a chain reaction of "hits" as the cars were already lined up and stopped. We brought the car to the Jeep dealership and they did confirm that the internal valve body failure and TCM fault contributed to improper communication within the transmission. They did replace the TCM and valve body assembly, reprogrammed the module and road tested the vehicle. The auto stop/start warning light came on after the incident. They performed a battery test for the main and auxiliary, and both failed load test and read at low voltages. Both batteries were replaced and fault codes cleared. Upon receiving the vehicle, I tested the cruise control component and it has been working for the past three months now.
- NHTSA ID
- 11737303
- Incident
- Feb 1, 2026
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
SERVICE BRAKES
Customer Can Not Make Changes to Pedestrian Emergency Braking (PEB) Setting in Radio.
ENGINE
MIL-On and/or Engine Oil Leak
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Radio Over The Air Update to U43.17 R1H Software Version (FOTA) Customers may experience one or more of the following:- Navigation Stability - Android Auto & Carplay stability & connectivity- Distorted/glitchy display prior to start‑up animation- Text appearance display- Widget incorrect display- Turn signal blind spot response timing- Audio cut out - Drive Modes selection- Park assist Guidelines selction
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; STRUCTURE:BODY
Passive Entry O/S Dr Handle Prior to replacing an inoperative passive entry door handle, perform Star Online S2623000040.
ENGINE
Not applicable to vehicles built for US market. Oil Leak Through The Rear Crankshaft Oil Seal (Flywheel Side) Customers may comment on the following: ● Oil Pressure warning light illuminates. ● Engine oil is leaking onto the floor beneath the vehicle This bulletin involves inspecting for oil leaks and if necessary replacing the rear crankshaft oil seal (flywheel side)
STRUCTURE:BODY
Sunroof Assy Sunroof glass and/or sunshade cannot open/close (inoperative). 1. Please follow the service procedure: 08-Electrical/8N - Power Systems/ Power Top, Sunroof/ Diagnosis and Testing. 2. If sunroof motors continue to be inoperative, please contact STAR and reference SET 1599. ***This should be done before trying to replace the sunroof motors.***
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2026Viewing | 4 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 51.6 |
| 2024 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 51.9 |
| 2023 | 46 | 2 | 0 | 49.8 |
| 2022 | 222 | 4 | 0 | 52.1 |
| 2021 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 45.2 |
| 2020 | 140 | 1 | 1 | 50.2 |
| 2019 | 329 | 2 | 1 | 56.6 |
| 2018 | 942 | 6 | 0 | 52.2 |
| 2017 | 229 | 4 | 3 | 59.9 |
| 2016 | 293 | 1 | 4 | 55.0 |
| 2015 | 113 | 1 | 4 | 51.8 |
| 2014 | 307 | 2 | 2 | 57.3 |
| 2013 | 80 | 1 | 2 | 50.3 |
| 2012 | 184 | 4 | 2 | 55.0 |
| 2011 | 187 | 3 | 2 | 53.1 |
| 2010 | 71 | 2 | 1 | 54.3 |
| 2009 | 44 | 1 | 0 | 36.7 |
| 2008 | 93 | 0 | 0 | 31.6 |
| 2007 | 259 | 3 | 0 | 49.2 |
| 2006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.