ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:WIRING
2017 Toyota Prius
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 91 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2017 Toyota Prius, most frequently naming the visibility, brakes and driver assistance categories. 3 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; 1 NHTSA investigation names it; and 244 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 2017 | 1 | 1 |
| Apr 2017 | 3 | 4 |
| May 2017 | 1 | 5 |
| Jun 2017 | 1 | 6 |
| Jul 2017 | 3 | 9 |
| Aug 2017 | 2 | 11 |
| Sep 2017 | 3 | 14 |
| Oct 2017 | 1 | 15 |
| Nov 2017 | 2 | 17 |
| Dec 2017 | 5 | 22 |
| Jan 2018 | 1 | 23 |
| Feb 2018 | 1 | 24 |
| Apr 2018 | 2 | 26 |
| May 2018 | 2 | 28 |
| Jun 2018 | 1 | 29 |
| Jul 2018 | 2 | 31 |
| Aug 2018 | 6 | 37 |
| Sep 2018 | 1 | 38 |
| Oct 2018 | 4 | 42 |
| Nov 2018 | 1 | 43 |
| Dec 2018 | 2 | 45 |
| Jan 2019 | 2 | 47 |
| Feb 2019 | 1 | 48 |
| Mar 2019 | 3 | 51 |
| Apr 2019 | 1 | 52 |
| May 2019 | 1 | 53 |
| Jun 2019 | 1 | 54 |
| Jul 2019 | 3 | 57 |
| Aug 2019 | 1 | 58 |
| Sep 2019 | 1 | 59 |
| Oct 2019 | 2 | 61 |
| Nov 2019 | 2 | 63 |
| Dec 2019 | 1 | 64 |
| Jan 2020 | 1 | 65 |
| Feb 2020 | 1 | 66 |
| Apr 2020 | 1 | 67 |
| Oct 2020 | 1 | 68 |
| Apr 2021 | 1 | 69 |
| May 2021 | 1 | 70 |
| Jun 2021 | 1 | 71 |
| Jul 2021 | 1 | 72 |
| Apr 2022 | 1 | 73 |
| Jun 2022 | 1 | 74 |
| Oct 2022 | 2 | 76 |
| Feb 2023 | 1 | 77 |
| Aug 2023 | 1 | 78 |
| Sep 2023 | 1 | 79 |
| Oct 2023 | 2 | 81 |
| Jul 2024 | 3 | 84 |
| Nov 2024 | 2 | 86 |
| Feb 2025 | 1 | 87 |
| Jul 2025 | 2 | 89 |
| Dec 2025 | 1 | 90 |
| May 2026 | 1 | 91 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Visibility1714.9%
- Brakes1412.3%
- Driver assistance1412.3%
- Engine1311.4%
- Fuel system1210.5%
- Electrical119.6%
- Steering76.1%
- Body & structure76.1%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
3 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govTIRES:TEMPORARY/EMERGENCY SPARE TIRE
PARKING BRAKE
Safety investigations
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
Pedestrian alert sounds
NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
The catalytic converter heat exchanger failed internally, causing coolant to leak into the exhaust system. Symptoms included white smoke from exhaust and coolant loss with no visible ground leak. This is a documented factory defect per Toyota Technical Service Bulletin T-SB-0135-19 affecting 2016-2019 Prius models. Toyota has denied warranty coverage despite the vehicle was originally bought & spent its entire prior operational life registered in New York, a state covered under Toyota's full 15-year/150,000-mile emissions warranty. Defect was confirmed by an authorized Toyota dealership, in PA. Vehicle had approximately 83,104 miles at time of diagnosis. Manufacturer denied coverage and is forcing the customer (me) to pay a huge amount for this very well known & defective case. MOST IMPORTANTLY ITS dangerous and unsafe for all the cars our there too, since it is very well known that at a certain point this will happen, but despite TOYOTA never sent a RECALL. Due to this, engine light goes on & off, refrigerant is flammable and leaks in the exhaust pipe happens with this specific case, which ultimately could catch on fire, while the vehicle is moving or stalling. Lots of white smoke comes out of the car that directly impact the environmental aspects, and above all, people owning such vehicle, will be running into this issue, which will 100% put the safety of owner and anyone close in proximity to their vehicle at RISK. PLEASE ADD RECALL WITHOUT CAP for ALL SUCH TOYATA PRIUS due to flammable refrigerant leak inside the car engine components, and proven via strong white smoke coming out of exhaust that has the potentially to put the entire car on fire, specifically.
- NHTSA ID
- 11738755
- Incident
- May 19, 2026
Odometer Fraud. The contact purchased a 2017 Toyota Prius. It was discovered when the contact listed the vehicle for sale that there was a mileage discrepancy. The vehicle was as a private sale. At the time of the purchase, the mileage was 126,611. The potential purchaser provided a CARFAX report that recorded the mileage on 11/6/2024 at 225,810.
- NHTSA ID
- 11706080
- Incident
- Sep 10, 2025
- Mileage
- 225,810 mi
During hot temperatures and after coming to a full stop, the car stalls/hesitates significantly (5-6seconds) when pushing the gas pedal. The car eventually proceeds but the issue reoccurs. It can only be intermittently reproduced and no codes are shown on the car dashboard. Mechanics are unable to identify the source of the issue so it cannot be resolved.
- NHTSA ID
- 11674665
- Incident
- Jul 18, 2025
Standing at a red light and someone rear ended
- NHTSA ID
- 11674421
- Incident
- Sep 23, 2024
The contact owns a 2017 Toyota Prius. The contact stated that while driving approximately 25-30 MPH, the vents were blowing out cold air. The check engine warning light was illuminated. The contact was adding coolant to the coolant reservoir every three to four days. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer, where it was diagnosed and determined that the coolant was leaking into the exhaust pipe. The dealer recommended that the exhaust system front pipe be replaced. The manufacturer was contacted, opened a case, and referred the contact to the NHTSA Hotline for assistance. The failure mileage was approximately 81,700.
- NHTSA ID
- 11645348
- Incident
- Feb 21, 2025
- Mileage
- 81,700 mi
The contact owns a 2017 Toyota Prius. The contact stated while the contact's wife was driving at an undisclosed speed, the accelerator pedal was depressed. The accelerator pedal was depressed, however the vehicle failed to accelerate as intended. The contact stated that the vehicle stalled and jerked. The vehicle was driven to the residence. The contact stated that the battery indicator did not look as if the battery was charging. The contact stated that the vehicle was taken to two independent mechanics; however, the failure was not duplicated. In addition, the vehicle was taken to the dealer; however, the failure was not duplicated. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired by an independent mechanic or the dealer. The contact stated that the failure had become persistent. The contact stated that during one failure his wife was driving, and the vehicle lost motive power and stalled. The vehicle failed to restart. The vehicle was towed to an independent mechanic however, the failure was not duplicated. In addition, the contact stated that during one failure, the excessive acceleration warning light illuminated. The contact had not depressed the accelerator pedal during the failure. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and a case was filed. The contact was informed that no assistance was available. The failure mileage was approximately 68,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11627707
- Incident
- Jun 17, 2024
- Mileage
- 68,000 mi
Dear NHTSA, I am seeking assistance and compensation for ongoing warranty and repair issues with my Toyota Prius. Key Incident Timeline: •March 21, 2024: Dashboard message “Grille Shutter Inoperable” •March 25, 2024: Toyota of Glendale visit •Charged $220 for diagnostics •Refused to honor service bulletin •Vehicle mileage: 149,217 Customer Service Interactions: •April 9, 2024: •Contacted Toyota customer service •Confirmed CA emissions coverage to 150,000 miles •Discovered extended warranty unexpectedly canceled Brand Engagement Claim: •April 9, 2024: Filed claim with Toyota’s Brand Engagement line •June 26, 2024: Claim denied, dealership’s decision upheld Repair Challenges: •July 5, 2024: Wondries Toyota diagnostic visit •Charged $200 for diagnostics •Confirmed active service bulletins would have covered repairs Repair Management: •Northeast Mechanic has handled all subsequent repairs due to Toyota’s failures Financial Losses Breakdown: •Initial diagnostic fee (Toyota of Glendale): $220.00 •Diagnostic fee (Wondries Toyota): $200.00 •Car rental (July 6, 2024 - Hertz): $1,356.17 •Car parts: $1,706.55 •Labor on vehicle: $754.22 •Water pump: $167.78 •Head Gasket, Spark Plugs, Engine Water Pump: $2,161.00 •Total financial loss: $6,565.72 I request a comprehensive investigation into these warranty and repair issues, seeking full compensation for the financial burden caused by Toyota’s repeated failures. Sincerely, [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11626715
- Incident
- Mar 21, 2024
While driving the speed limit of 70mph on a major highway, the sunroof on my 2017 Toyota Prius exploded. There was no warning of any kind: no other traffic nearby so no rock or debris from another vehicle; no overpass or bridge so nothing from above; it was a mild sunny day of 76 degrees so not a weather factor; and by the angle of the glass that remains being in an outward position rather than inward, reveals to me that it was from inside out, not from outside in as if it were a rock hitting. It just exploded. I was the only person in the car. Thankfully, the visor was shut on it or the shattered glass would have caused injury and of greater serious concern is just the sudden sound of what sounded like a bomb going off over my head was enough to cause a reaction which easily would result in an accident. It was a terrifying experience! I was lucky no other vehicles were nearby and could react and safely get off the road. I called 911 immediately and reported it. I have read many such claims from other Toyota owners online (see ToyotaNation.com and search by "exploding Sunroof") and even from a technician at my nearby Toyota Collision Center that it just happened to a friend of theirs also. This is not a one time issue. When I took the car to the Collision Center for an estimate and inquired about the damage, they could find no recall on it by Toyota. This is certainly a dangerous and hazardous issue that needs to be addressed asap before someone is seriously hurt or there is a fatality.
- NHTSA ID
- 11605347
- Incident
- Jul 21, 2024
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
Some 2005 – 2026 Toyota vehicles that have undergone water intrusion may exhibit a condition in which a musty odor is present. Follow the procedures in this bulletin to remediate the odor and address this condition. The purpose of this Service Bulletin is to provide general guidelines and procedures for odor remediation. This Service Bulletin provides a guide on how to prepare and treat the interior of the vehicle for odor remediation. Refer to the applicable model and model year Repair Manual and the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) website for the most up-to-date safety and precautionary guidelines.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Some customers may experience echoing on the line calling the vehicle when using Bluetooth Hands Free. This is caused by the phone Hands Free volume being too low.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
The air conditioning dye injection tool kit has been developed to aid in identifying the location of air conditioning refrigerant leaks. The procedures outlined in this Service Bulletin aid in locating, inspecting, and repairing refrigerant leaks.
ENGINE
This bulletin includes basic procedures for performing a rescue charge at battery on high voltage (HV) Ni-MH and Li-ion batteries. This bulletin should be used in conjunction with the applicable model and model year Repair Manual while performing the battery rescue charge. The GRX-5100 should be used wherever the Repair Manual references the Toyota Hybrid System (THS) charger.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle, especially the horizontal areas such as the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage to the painted surfaces can occur. Acid rain damage can typically be identified on vehicles by the presence of stains on the paint surface that resemble hard water spots. Unlike water spots however, acid rain damage cannot be removed by regular washing procedures. Also, because acid rain can etch and soften the paint, normal buffing or polishing repair procedures should not be attempted. This can cause further damage and result in visible depressions in the paint surface. The following are the three major categories of acid rain damage: •Minor damage: requires only buffing to repair. •Moderate damage: usually requires neutralizing, color sanding, and buffing. •Severe damage: extending beyond 1/2 mil of clearcoat on a pearl, metallic, or solid color, requires neutralization, sanding, and repainting. In cases where acid rain damage is minor, neutralization and buffing with a liquid-type paint finessing product may provide an adequate repair. Only specially formulated products outlined in this bulletin should be used for that purpose. Unfortunately, other than minor damage, there is no simple method of determining the actual extent (depth) of acid penetration other than color sanding a representative affected area until there is no visible etching or depressions, followed by measuring the amount of paint removed with either a magnetic or digital-type film thickness gauge. The procedures in this bulletin are intended for use by qualified body/paint technicians and should not be attempted by inexperienced personnel. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. Perform frequent vehicle washing, as often as daily, during high heat and humidity periods to minimize the potential for paint damage due to acid rain exposure. This is especially important in geographical areas known for high frequency and concentration of acid rain and industrial fallout.
STRUCTURE:BODY
To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2026 | 5 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 57.4 |
| 2024 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 62.9 |
| 2023 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 53.6 |
| 2022 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 59.3 |
| 2021 | 6 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 2020 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 59.5 |
| 2019 | 29 | 3 | 1 | 66.8 |
| 2018 | 35 | 1 | 1 | 52.7 |
| 2017Viewing | 91 | 3 | 1 | 58.8 |
| 2016 | 154 | 5 | 1 | 54.2 |
| 2015 | 162 | 1 | 3 | 69.6 |
| 2014 | 205 | 3 | 3 | 71.8 |
| 2013 | 403 | 3 | 3 | 71.9 |
| 2012 | 421 | 6 | 3 | 69.3 |
| 2011 | 517 | 6 | 3 | 65.6 |
| 2010 | 2,820 | 10 | 4 | 63.3 |
| 2009 | 502 | 6 | 2 | 63.4 |
| 2008 | 1,497 | 4 | 2 | 60.6 |
| 2007 | 2,003 | 4 | 3 | 58.9 |
| 2006 | 1,439 | 6 | 3 | 60.7 |
| 2005 | 1,051 | 6 | 3 | 62.4 |
| 2004 | 610 | 6 | 3 | 58.9 |
| 2003 | 99 | 1 | 1 | 43.5 |
| 2002 | 167 | 2 | 1 | 54.9 |
| 2001 | 165 | 3 | 1 | 55.8 |
| 2000 | 4 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1998 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.