HYBRID PROPULSION SYSTEM: INVERTER
2015 Toyota Prius
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 162 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2015 Toyota Prius, most frequently naming the brakes, electrical and driver assistance categories. 1 safety recall has been issued covering this model year; 3 NHTSA investigations name it; and 324 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2018 | 1 | 38 |
| Aug 2018 | 1 | 39 |
| Sep 2018 | 2 | 41 |
| Dec 2018 | 1 | 42 |
| Mar 2019 | 1 | 43 |
| Apr 2019 | 3 | 46 |
| Jun 2019 | 2 | 48 |
| Jul 2019 | 2 | 50 |
| Aug 2019 | 2 | 52 |
| Sep 2019 | 2 | 54 |
| Jan 2020 | 2 | 56 |
| Feb 2020 | 1 | 57 |
| Apr 2020 | 1 | 58 |
| Jun 2020 | 1 | 59 |
| Jul 2020 | 2 | 61 |
| Aug 2020 | 2 | 63 |
| Mar 2021 | 1 | 64 |
| May 2021 | 2 | 66 |
| Jun 2021 | 2 | 68 |
| Jul 2021 | 1 | 69 |
| Aug 2021 | 2 | 71 |
| Sep 2021 | 1 | 72 |
| Oct 2021 | 1 | 73 |
| Dec 2021 | 1 | 74 |
| Feb 2022 | 1 | 75 |
| Apr 2022 | 1 | 76 |
| Jun 2022 | 3 | 79 |
| Sep 2022 | 1 | 80 |
| Feb 2023 | 1 | 81 |
| Mar 2023 | 1 | 82 |
| Apr 2023 | 1 | 83 |
| Jun 2023 | 1 | 84 |
| Jul 2023 | 1 | 85 |
| Aug 2023 | 1 | 86 |
| Jan 2024 | 1 | 87 |
| Jun 2024 | 1 | 88 |
| Jul 2024 | 1 | 89 |
| Aug 2024 | 1 | 90 |
| Oct 2024 | 2 | 92 |
| Nov 2024 | 1 | 93 |
| Dec 2024 | 1 | 94 |
| Jan 2025 | 1 | 95 |
| Feb 2025 | 3 | 98 |
| Mar 2025 | 3 | 101 |
| Apr 2025 | 3 | 104 |
| May 2025 | 2 | 106 |
| Jun 2025 | 4 | 110 |
| Jul 2025 | 4 | 114 |
| Aug 2025 | 4 | 118 |
| Sep 2025 | 6 | 124 |
| Oct 2025 | 2 | 126 |
| Nov 2025 | 5 | 131 |
| Dec 2025 | 3 | 134 |
| Jan 2026 | 5 | 139 |
| Feb 2026 | 4 | 143 |
| Mar 2026 | 4 | 147 |
| May 2026 | 7 | 154 |
| Jun 2026 | 5 | 159 |
| Jul 2026 | 2 | 161 |
| Aug 2026 | 1 | 162 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Brakes8944.5%
- Electrical2713.5%
- Driver assistance157.5%
- Powertrain (other)136.5%
- Engine84.0%
- Exterior lighting73.5%
- Airbags63.0%
- Body & structure63.0%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
1 campaign cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSafety investigations
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
Brake Actuator Valve Wear
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received a petition dated September 19, 2023 from the owner of a 2012 Toyota Prius V requesting that ODI reevaluate its decision to deny DP19-004. In the letter, the petitioner reported experiencing an unexpected and complete loss of brake power while driving, accompanied by multiple dashboard warning lights. This petition is based on the petitioner's direct experience and assessment that ODI closed DP19-004 because its prompting petition was withdrawn by that petitioner. ODI will review the work conducted during DP19-004 and a review of any additional related complaints and crashes via a new defect petition The petition and related materials can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under the following ODI number:11553736.
Pedestrian alert sounds
NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.
Brake Actuator Valve Wear
On September 19, 2019, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a defect petition from Mr. Roger Hogan requesting that the Agency investigate and recall certain Toyota Prius, Prius PHV, Camry Hybrid and Avalon Hybrid vehicles for a brake actuator valve wear condition covered under Toyota Customer Support Programs ZJB and ZKK (subject CSP?s). In support of his request, the petitioner identified 117 NHTSA complaints allegedly related to the subject CSP condition, including 60 reporting crashes. On September 30, 2019, ODI opened Defect Petition DP19-004 to evaluate the petitioner?s request for an investigation. In August 2020, the petitioner notified the Agency that he was withdrawing his petition. Because the petitioner has withdrawn the petition, we are denying the petition as moot and no further analysis of this petition is necessary.NHTSA is authorized to issue an order requiring notification and remedy of a defect if the Agency?s investigation shows a defect in the design, construction, or performance of a motor vehicle that presents an unreasonable risk to safety. 49 U.S.C. ?? 30102(a)(9), 30118. Because the petitioner has with withdrawn the petition, the petition is denied as moot. This action does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The Agency notes that it is not required to receive a defect petition prior to opening a defect investigation and will take further action if warranted by future circumstances.
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
Code DTC C1391 - Abnormal leak of accumulator pressure. Internal failure of the brake booster pump assembly, preventing the system from maintaining proper hydraulic pressure. This means the brakes don't work, putting the driver's and passengers' lives at risk. This DTC C1391 code and problem were reproduced and confirmed by an independent service center who specializes in 3rd generation priuses. There were warning lights that lit up when the brakes failed - the ABS, traction control, and brake light all lit up but only after the brakes had stopped working. This is a known manufacturer defect but toyota won't pay to fix it because they put a 10 year limit on first driven date or 150,000 miles. This prius only has 100k miles but toyota still won't stand behind their product even though they have admitted it was a manufacturing defect and they sold a defective product.
- NHTSA ID
- 11756229
- Incident
- Aug 6, 2026
I was rear-ended by a truck in my prius and my seat laid back on impact. I'm unaware if that was an intended thing or not but it potentially could have injured my neck. My car is currently in a storage lot awaiting the adjustor's inspection so it is available for inspection if needed. No warning lights were available and it hasn't been recreated by the dealer
- NHTSA ID
- 11753382
- Incident
- Jul 27, 2026
Pulling out of a parking stall, when put vehicle in drive, the engine revved up and accelerated - vehicle crashed, the brakes did not work- there was skid marks. Floor mats are factory OEM were installed properly. I did not hit the accelerator and I am in good health and mind. I have driving for over 30 years, never had and accident nor a ticket! - A county officer was at the seen and left me with vehicle that had to be towed away. The Vehicle is a total loss. I have insurance but felt that this incident need to be reported, There is no safety recalls and the vehicle was always property maintained
- NHTSA ID
- 11750516
- Incident
- Jun 28, 2026
The vehicle experienced a failure in the braking system involving the brake booster/brake actuator assembly. The vehicle displayed diagnostic trouble code C1391, which is associated with a malfunction of the brake booster pump/accumulator system on this model. The failed component is available for inspection upon request. The failure created a safety concern because the braking system warning lights illuminated and the vehicle’s brake assist system may not function properly. A malfunction of the brake actuator/booster system could increase stopping distance, reduce braking performance, and create a potential risk of a crash, especially during emergency braking situations. The problem has been confirmed through diagnosis showing the C1391 trouble code. The issue has been identified as a brake system malfunction requiring repair of the brake booster/actuator assembly. The vehicle has been inspected/diagnosed by a service professional. The vehicle has not been inspected by police or insurance representatives. Toyota/dealer inspection information is available if requested. I contacted Toyota regarding the issue, but they declined assistance because the extended warranty coverage expired approximately 7 months prior to the failure. Before the failure, the vehicle operated normally. The first symptoms occurred when multiple warning lights appeared while driving, including the ABS warning light, brake warning light, parking brake warning light (even though the parking brake was not engaged), and the traction control/slippery road warning light. These warning lights appeared suddenly, indicating a problem with the braking system.
- NHTSA ID
- 11746503
- Incident
- Jun 23, 2026
The contact owns a 2015 Toyota Prius. The contact stated that while driving and coming to a complete stop, the vehicle was rear-ended by another vehicle driving approximately 35-45 MPH. The contact stated that upon impact, the front driver's seat unexpectedly reclined and struck the rear passenger’s seat. The contact was concerned about the movement of the seat and stated that an occupant seated directly behind the driver's seat could have been injured. The rear bumper, trunk, and rear body structure sustained damage from the crash. The contact stated that the force of the impact caused the rear driver’s side body panels to flare outward and become deformed. No additional property damage had occurred from the crash. The vehicle remained in the roadway following the crash. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact sustained neck injuries, whiplash, and emotional trauma from the crash. Medical attention was sought. The Uber passenger inside the vehicle was also transported from the scene to seek medical attention and treatment; however, the extent of the injury was unknown. The contact considered the vehicle a total loss by the contact, but the vehicle was not declared a total loss. The vehicle was towed to a tow yard. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 205,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11744174
- Incident
- Jun 10, 2026
- Mileage
- 205,000 mi
The contact owns a 2015 Toyota Prius. The contact stated that while driving at 45 MPH, the brake warning lights illuminated. The brakes were inoperable and entered manual mode. The contact stated that the brake warning lights were red and yellow. The vehicle was taken to Brake Masters, where it was diagnosed with brake actuator failure. The local dealer was contacted but did not provide assistance. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 121,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11743224
- Incident
- Jun 6, 2026
- Mileage
- 121,000 mi
The incident involved having to press extremely hard on the brake pedal to stop the car, while it was uphill in the middle of the road. The car started going backward and was throwing ABS, Master Warning Light, Brake System Warning Light and Warning Buzzer, Brake System Warning Light, and SLIP Indicator signals. This was a highly distraughtful situation on the road. Diagnostics showed C1391 Diagnostic Trouble Code on the 2015 Toyota Prius: brake booster and brake booster pump problem. When pressing the brake pedal there is a high pitched metal scraping noise. Toyota coverage program is only applicable for 10 years from the date of first use or 150,000 miles, whichever occurs first. Many cars run well for over 10 years with good care, so the 10 year cap barely covers anything. This is highly unfair and borderline scamming for an issue so severe, which can cause big accidents on the road. In all honesty, this is a life or death situation when it comes to not being able to properly brake while driving. This should be a full recall!!
- NHTSA ID
- 11742921
- Incident
- Mar 28, 2026
The brake pump and actuator on my 2015 prius has been faulty and the repair was apparently covered under the customer support program but it expired in December. I had no knowledge of it and when I took my car in to a toyota dealership, no one told me about about the profram but told me that they needed to be replaced. I did not get the repair because of the hefty cost and I missed the deadline. My safety and the safety of other drivers were put at risk for not allowing me to be notified by it and my car being at risk for my brakes failing at any time. Their were absolutely no warning lights on my vehicle as well.
- NHTSA ID
- 11741829
- Incident
- Dec 17, 2025
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
ENGINE
OBSOLETE NOTICE February 13, 2026: This bulletin is now obsolete. Please see T-SB-0009-26.
ENGINE
This bulletin includes basic procedures for performing a rescue charge on Ni-MH high voltage (HV) batteries. This bulletin should be used in conjunction with the applicable model and model year Repair Manual while performing a rescue charge. The GRX-5100 should be used wherever the Repair Manual references the Toyota Hybrid System (THS) charger.
Some 2005 – 2026 Toyota vehicles that have undergone water intrusion may exhibit a condition in which a musty odor is present. Follow the procedures in this bulletin to remediate the odor and address this condition. The purpose of this Service Bulletin is to provide general guidelines and procedures for odor remediation. This Service Bulletin provides a guide on how to prepare and treat the interior of the vehicle for odor remediation. Refer to the applicable model and model year Repair Manual and the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) website for the most up-to-date safety and precautionary guidelines.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
The air conditioning dye injection tool kit has been developed to aid in identifying the location of air conditioning refrigerant leaks. The procedures outlined in this Service Bulletin aid in locating, inspecting, and repairing refrigerant leaks.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle, especially the horizontal areas such as the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage to the painted surfaces can occur. Acid rain damage can typically be identified on vehicles by the presence of stains on the paint surface that resemble hard water spots. Unlike water spots however, acid rain damage cannot be removed by regular washing procedures. Also, because acid rain can etch and soften the paint, normal buffing or polishing repair procedures should not be attempted. This can cause further damage and result in visible depressions in the paint surface. The following are the three major categories of acid rain damage: •Minor damage: requires only buffing to repair. •Moderate damage: usually requires neutralizing, color sanding, and buffing. •Severe damage: extending beyond 1/2 mil of clearcoat on a pearl, metallic, or solid color, requires neutralization, sanding, and repainting. In cases where acid rain damage is minor, neutralization and buffing with a liquid-type paint finessing product may provide an adequate repair. Only specially formulated products outlined in this bulletin should be used for that purpose. Unfortunately, other than minor damage, there is no simple method of determining the actual extent (depth) of acid penetration other than color sanding a representative affected area until there is no visible etching or depressions, followed by measuring the amount of paint removed with either a magnetic or digital-type film thickness gauge. The procedures in this bulletin are intended for use by qualified body/paint technicians and should not be attempted by inexperienced personnel. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. Perform frequent vehicle washing, as often as daily, during high heat and humidity periods to minimize the potential for paint damage due to acid rain exposure. This is especially important in geographical areas known for high frequency and concentration of acid rain and industrial fallout.
STRUCTURE:BODY
To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2026 | 5 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 57.4 |
| 2024 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 62.9 |
| 2023 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 53.6 |
| 2022 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 59.3 |
| 2021 | 6 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 2020 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 59.5 |
| 2019 | 29 | 3 | 1 | 66.8 |
| 2018 | 35 | 1 | 1 | 52.7 |
| 2017 | 91 | 3 | 1 | 58.8 |
| 2016 | 154 | 5 | 1 | 54.2 |
| 2015Viewing | 162 | 1 | 3 | 69.6 |
| 2014 | 205 | 3 | 3 | 71.8 |
| 2013 | 403 | 3 | 3 | 71.9 |
| 2012 | 421 | 6 | 3 | 69.3 |
| 2011 | 517 | 6 | 3 | 65.6 |
| 2010 | 2,820 | 10 | 4 | 63.3 |
| 2009 | 502 | 6 | 2 | 63.4 |
| 2008 | 1,497 | 4 | 2 | 60.6 |
| 2007 | 2,003 | 4 | 3 | 58.9 |
| 2006 | 1,439 | 6 | 3 | 60.7 |
| 2005 | 1,051 | 6 | 3 | 62.4 |
| 2004 | 610 | 6 | 3 | 58.9 |
| 2003 | 99 | 1 | 1 | 43.5 |
| 2002 | 167 | 2 | 1 | 54.9 |
| 2001 | 165 | 3 | 1 | 55.8 |
| 2000 | 4 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1998 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.