STEERING:HYDRAULIC POWER ASSIST SYSTEM; STEERING:RACK AND PINION
2010 Toyota Tundra
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 163 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2010 Toyota Tundra, most frequently naming the suspension, driver assistance and body & structure categories. 16 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 277 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2015 | 1 | 78 |
| May 2015 | 1 | 79 |
| Jun 2015 | 1 | 80 |
| Jul 2015 | 1 | 81 |
| Aug 2015 | 1 | 82 |
| Sep 2015 | 1 | 83 |
| Nov 2015 | 2 | 85 |
| Dec 2015 | 1 | 86 |
| Jan 2016 | 4 | 90 |
| Feb 2016 | 1 | 91 |
| Mar 2016 | 1 | 92 |
| Apr 2016 | 3 | 95 |
| May 2016 | 1 | 96 |
| Sep 2016 | 3 | 99 |
| Dec 2016 | 2 | 101 |
| Jan 2017 | 1 | 102 |
| Mar 2017 | 3 | 105 |
| Apr 2017 | 1 | 106 |
| May 2017 | 1 | 107 |
| Jun 2017 | 2 | 109 |
| Jul 2017 | 1 | 110 |
| Sep 2017 | 1 | 111 |
| Oct 2017 | 1 | 112 |
| Nov 2017 | 1 | 113 |
| Apr 2018 | 1 | 114 |
| Jun 2018 | 1 | 115 |
| Aug 2018 | 2 | 117 |
| Oct 2018 | 1 | 118 |
| Nov 2018 | 1 | 119 |
| Dec 2018 | 2 | 121 |
| Feb 2019 | 1 | 122 |
| Mar 2019 | 3 | 125 |
| Apr 2019 | 2 | 127 |
| May 2019 | 1 | 128 |
| Jun 2019 | 1 | 129 |
| Sep 2019 | 1 | 130 |
| Dec 2019 | 4 | 134 |
| Jun 2020 | 1 | 135 |
| Jul 2020 | 1 | 136 |
| Sep 2020 | 1 | 137 |
| Dec 2020 | 1 | 138 |
| Feb 2021 | 2 | 140 |
| Sep 2021 | 1 | 141 |
| Dec 2021 | 1 | 142 |
| Feb 2022 | 1 | 143 |
| Mar 2022 | 2 | 145 |
| Apr 2022 | 1 | 146 |
| May 2022 | 1 | 147 |
| Aug 2022 | 2 | 149 |
| Nov 2022 | 1 | 150 |
| Feb 2023 | 1 | 151 |
| Apr 2023 | 1 | 152 |
| Jul 2023 | 1 | 153 |
| Sep 2023 | 2 | 155 |
| Dec 2023 | 1 | 156 |
| May 2024 | 1 | 157 |
| Jan 2025 | 1 | 158 |
| Mar 2025 | 1 | 159 |
| Jul 2025 | 3 | 162 |
| Jun 2026 | 1 | 163 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Suspension3115.0%
- Driver assistance2713.0%
- Body & structure2512.1%
- Brakes199.2%
- Powertrain (other)188.7%
- Engine188.7%
- Electrical167.7%
- Fuel system115.3%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
16 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSTEERING:HYDRAULIC POWER ASSIST SYSTEM; STEERING:RACK AND PINION
SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
My understanding is that my vehicle went in for the frame issue. However on both the driver and passenger sides the frame is literally disintegrating. The metal is falling apart in solid chunks, not flakes actual chunks ⅜" x 2" x 3"! This is taking place in the exact same locations on each side. Just aft of the front suspension cross frame and in front of the transmission/transfer case cross support.
- NHTSA ID
- 11746857
- Incident
- Jun 26, 2026
Odometer Fraud. The contact purchased a 2010 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated that while attempting to register the vehicle, it was discovered that there was a mileage discrepancy. The vehicle was a private sale. At the time of purchase, the vehicle mileage was 100,000 and at the time of registration, it was discovered that the mileage was 250,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11672503
- Incident
- Jul 10, 2025
- Mileage
- 250,000 mi
I am writing to formally bring to your attention a troubling situation I have encountered regarding the purchase of a vehicle that I believe constitutes fraud. On [XXX], I, [XXX] , purchased a 2010 Toyota Tundra from Beaverton Car Company in Beaverton, Oregon. I agreed to a high-interest loan, expecting to refinance the vehicle shortly thereafter. However, upon attempting to trade the vehicle on September 13, 2024, I learned that the outstanding loan balance exceeded the truck's value due to an illegal odometer rollback. The dealer informed me that the odometer had been rolled back prior to the auction from which they acquired the vehicle; at the time of sale, it displayed 81,000 miles but had actually accrued 268,000 miles. Despite signing the CARFAX indicating a “potential odometer rollback,” I was misled regarding the vehicle’s actual mileage. This significant discrepancy has caused financial distress and I believe it breaches legal statutes regarding odometer accuracy. Given the dealership’s dishonesty and the impact on my financing arrangements, I am seeking a full refund for the vehicle. I appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to your guidance on how to proceed. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11672458
- Incident
- Feb 1, 2024
Took my 2010 Tundra in for service at a local repair shop and was told that my frame has severe rust on the frame and is in poor condition. I am worried about the safety of this vehicle for me and my family. I am the only owner of the truck and purchased it brand new. What can be done? Thank you
- NHTSA ID
- 11671839
- Incident
- Jul 1, 2025
Rusting frame on the vehicle leading to potential cracks and creating safety concerns. Truck has low miles and been well maintained.This is my second Toyota truck with a rusted frame. No help or support from Toyota on my concerns with the 2010 Tundra.
- NHTSA ID
- 11645705
- Incident
- Feb 21, 2025
Gas Pump: Over the last few months, the vehicle has stalled twice, with the engine not functioning. Upon turning the ignition switch, the starter engages and the engine cranks, but it does not sustain operation. In both cases, the vehicle was able to start and run only after numerous attempts, exceeding 10 to 15, while consistently pressing the gas pedal.
- NHTSA ID
- 11634726
- Incident
- Jan 2, 2025
The contact owns a 2010 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated while the vehicle was in for inspection, the mechanic discovered corrosion present on the subframe of the vehicle. The contact stated that along with corrosion, the subframe was cracked and had several holes. The cause of the damage was not yet determined. The manufacturer and local dealer were notified of the failures, but no assistance was provided. The contact was informed that the vehicle was not eligible for the manufacturer's Extended Warranty coverage for the failure. The failure mileage was 82,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11589934
- Incident
- May 21, 2024
- Mileage
- 82,000 mi
My 2010 Toyota Tundra is like new and only has 56,000 miles on it. I ordered new tires and when I brought it to have the tires installed I was told me the frame was rusted through and they couldn’t lift it off the ground. They were concerned with me driving it and suggested that I bring it to my Toyota dealership and see what they could do. The dealership said there was nothing they could do because there was no recall on my vehicle. I asked if they could look at it to see it was safe to drive, and was told there would be a $167 to just look a my vehicle. I called Toyota Customer Service (800-331-4331) to complain and opened case# 23122000824. I called a frame shop to make an appointment to have it looked at and was told that they get lots of Tundra’s in with rotted frames. Apparently Toyota is ignoring this problem. They had an issue with rusted frames on the Toyota Tacoma and they issued a recall.
- NHTSA ID
- 11561391
- Incident
- Dec 20, 2023
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
Some 2005 – 2026 Toyota vehicles that have undergone water intrusion may exhibit a condition in which a musty odor is present. Follow the procedures in this bulletin to remediate the odor and address this condition. The purpose of this Service Bulletin is to provide general guidelines and procedures for odor remediation. This Service Bulletin provides a guide on how to prepare and treat the interior of the vehicle for odor remediation. Refer to the applicable model and model year Repair Manual and the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) website for the most up-to-date safety and precautionary guidelines.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle, especially the horizontal areas such as the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage to the painted surfaces can occur. Acid rain damage can typically be identified on vehicles by the presence of stains on the paint surface that resemble hard water spots. Unlike water spots however, acid rain damage cannot be removed by regular washing procedures. Also, because acid rain can etch and soften the paint, normal buffing or polishing repair procedures should not be attempted. This can cause further damage and result in visible depressions in the paint surface. The following are the three major categories of acid rain damage: •Minor damage: requires only buffing to repair. •Moderate damage: usually requires neutralizing, color sanding, and buffing. •Severe damage: extending beyond 1/2 mil of clearcoat on a pearl, metallic, or solid color, requires neutralization, sanding, and repainting. In cases where acid rain damage is minor, neutralization and buffing with a liquid-type paint finessing product may provide an adequate repair. Only specially formulated products outlined in this bulletin should be used for that purpose. Unfortunately, other than minor damage, there is no simple method of determining the actual extent (depth) of acid penetration other than color sanding a representative affected area until there is no visible etching or depressions, followed by measuring the amount of paint removed with either a magnetic or digital-type film thickness gauge. The procedures in this bulletin are intended for use by qualified body/paint technicians and should not be attempted by inexperienced personnel. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. Perform frequent vehicle washing, as often as daily, during high heat and humidity periods to minimize the potential for paint damage due to acid rain exposure. This is especially important in geographical areas known for high frequency and concentration of acid rain and industrial fallout.
STRUCTURE:BODY
The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these contaminants settle and remain on a painted vehicle surface, especially the horizonal areas of the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage can occur. This damage is the result of actual etching of the paint and appears as pitting or water spots. As acid rain droplets on the vehicle surface evaporate, the concentration strength of the acid increases, causing deeper and more rapid damage. This evaporation and corrosive action also occur more rapidly on dark colored cars as direct sun heat increases. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. In areas known for high frequency and/or concentration of acid rain, frequent vehicle washing during high heat or humidity periods will minimize the potential for paint damage caused by acid rain. It is further recommended that either reverse osmosis or deionized water be used to prevent water spotting.
STRUCTURE:BODY
To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Toyota vehicles are currently protected with RapgardTM protective film designed to protect the horizontal painted surfaces. This material protects from acid rain, environmental fallout, and rail contamination. Follow the Removal Procedure in this bulletin to remove the RapgardTM protective film within 90 days from initial application.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Vehicles may occasionally be subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles shed from railroad tracks, train wheels, exposure to heavy machinery facilities, grinding, welding, etc. This type of contamination can be identified by the presence of small, red or brown particles on the paint surface. These particles are often difficult to see on dark color paints but can be easily felt when brushing a hand across horizontal body surfaces such as the hood, roof, or deck lid. Follow the Repair Procedure in this bulletin to clean vehicles that may have been subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles such as rail dust during rail transportation or extended storage near industrial areas.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 48.0 |
| 2025 | 127 | 4 | 0 | 57.4 |
| 2024 | 314 | 10 | 0 | 57.8 |
| 2023 | 383 | 13 | 0 | 59.4 |
| 2022 | 418 | 13 | 0 | 56.1 |
| 2021 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 52.7 |
| 2020 | 45 | 5 | 0 | 58.1 |
| 2019 | 72 | 10 | 0 | 57.6 |
| 2018 | 99 | 9 | 0 | 58.3 |
| 2017 | 78 | 6 | 1 | 57.0 |
| 2016 | 119 | 6 | 1 | 55.9 |
| 2015 | 48 | 5 | 1 | 60.0 |
| 2014 | 92 | 5 | 1 | 53.6 |
| 2013 | 84 | 6 | 1 | 55.8 |
| 2012 | 154 | 4 | 1 | 54.2 |
| 2011 | 134 | 11 | 0 | 50.2 |
| 2010Viewing | 163 | 16 | 0 | 52.4 |
| 2009 | 38 | 13 | 0 | 47.4 |
| 2008 | 326 | 13 | 0 | 54.0 |
| 2007 | 389 | 14 | 0 | 53.7 |
| 2006 | 545 | 13 | 3 | 61.9 |
| 2005 | 374 | 14 | 5 | 63.7 |
| 2004 | 465 | 13 | 6 | 63.1 |
| 2003 | 399 | 10 | 4 | 65.2 |
| 2002 | 482 | 6 | 3 | 61.2 |
| 2001 | 415 | 5 | 1 | 57.6 |
| 2000 | 1,011 | 7 | 1 | 56.2 |
| 1999 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.