SUSPENSION:REAR
2012 Buick Regal
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 92 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2012 Buick Regal, most frequently naming the exterior lighting, engine and electrical categories. 7 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; 2 NHTSA investigations name it; and 1,750 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2013 | 1 | 10 |
| Oct 2013 | 1 | 11 |
| Apr 2014 | 1 | 12 |
| Jun 2014 | 1 | 13 |
| Mar 2015 | 3 | 16 |
| Jun 2015 | 1 | 17 |
| Jan 2016 | 1 | 18 |
| Sep 2016 | 1 | 19 |
| Mar 2017 | 1 | 20 |
| Jun 2017 | 1 | 21 |
| Sep 2017 | 1 | 22 |
| Oct 2017 | 1 | 23 |
| Nov 2017 | 1 | 24 |
| Jan 2018 | 1 | 25 |
| Mar 2018 | 1 | 26 |
| May 2018 | 1 | 27 |
| Jun 2018 | 1 | 28 |
| Jul 2018 | 1 | 29 |
| Aug 2018 | 3 | 32 |
| Sep 2018 | 1 | 33 |
| Nov 2018 | 1 | 34 |
| Dec 2018 | 2 | 36 |
| Apr 2019 | 3 | 39 |
| May 2019 | 3 | 42 |
| Aug 2019 | 1 | 43 |
| Dec 2019 | 3 | 46 |
| Jan 2020 | 3 | 49 |
| Apr 2020 | 1 | 50 |
| Jun 2020 | 2 | 52 |
| Oct 2020 | 3 | 55 |
| Nov 2020 | 2 | 57 |
| Jan 2021 | 1 | 58 |
| Feb 2021 | 2 | 60 |
| Mar 2021 | 1 | 61 |
| Apr 2021 | 2 | 63 |
| May 2021 | 1 | 64 |
| Jun 2021 | 4 | 68 |
| Jul 2021 | 2 | 70 |
| Aug 2021 | 1 | 71 |
| Sep 2021 | 1 | 72 |
| Oct 2021 | 1 | 73 |
| Nov 2021 | 1 | 74 |
| Dec 2021 | 1 | 75 |
| Feb 2022 | 1 | 76 |
| Apr 2022 | 1 | 77 |
| May 2022 | 1 | 78 |
| Jun 2022 | 1 | 79 |
| Sep 2022 | 1 | 80 |
| Nov 2022 | 1 | 81 |
| Jan 2023 | 1 | 82 |
| Apr 2023 | 1 | 83 |
| Jul 2023 | 1 | 84 |
| Sep 2023 | 1 | 85 |
| Oct 2023 | 1 | 86 |
| Mar 2024 | 1 | 87 |
| May 2024 | 1 | 88 |
| Nov 2024 | 1 | 89 |
| Jul 2025 | 1 | 90 |
| Aug 2025 | 1 | 91 |
| Jul 2026 | 1 | 92 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Exterior lighting3325.6%
- Engine2116.3%
- Electrical1713.2%
- Driver assistance118.5%
- Suspension118.5%
- Brakes97.0%
- Powertrain (other)75.4%
- Interior & seats64.7%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
7 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSUSPENSION:REAR
SUSPENSION:REAR
Safety investigations
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
Sands Chevrolet/Hybrid System Fire/Stall
NHTSA opened AQ14-001 to determine whether Sands Chevrolet of Surprise, Arizona complied with the requirements of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 (Safety Act) and its implementing regulations. The Safety Act requires, among other things, that a manufacturer notify its dealers of defects related to motor vehicle safety and non-compliances with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and, in turn, that a dealer not sell and deliver a new vehicle subject to a recall unless the recall remedy has been performed (49 U.S.C. ?? 30112(a), 30120(i)).NHTSA issued an information request (IR) letter to Sands Chevrolet on May 5, 2014.Sands Chevrolet responded to this request on May 22, 2014.To ensure NHTSA?s information request encompassed all possible reference codes for General Motors recall 13V-173, NHTSA issued another IR letter to Sands Chevrolet on June 8, 2015.Again, a response letter was received on June 9, 2015.NHTSA?s investigation indicated that Sands Chevrolet did sell and deliver recalled vehicles that did not have the recall remedy completed at the time the vehicles were delivered to the customers.NHTSA therefore concluded that Sands Chevrolet was liable for civil penalties for violations of the Safety Act, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. ? 30165.Under a Settlement Agreement dated March 24, 2016, Sands Chevrolet represented that it improved its processes to verify that it checks every vehicle for recalls prior to delivery to the purchaser and that it has not sold and delivered any unremedied new motor vehicles since June 9, 2015.Sands Chevrolet also represented that it now also checks for open recalls on every customer vehicle brought in for service, and that it checks for open recalls on every used trade-in vehicle, regardless of make or model, and takes steps to have all used trade-in vehicles repaired prior to retail sale. Sands Chevrolet admitted to violating the law and must pay civil penalties in the amount of $40,000.This Audit Query is closed.
Generator Control Module Fires
On July 5, 2013 the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Recall Query RQ13-003 to investigate whether the service procedures utilized in recall bulletins 13136 and 13142 for safety recall 13V-173 were sufficient to identify the safety defect in the subject vehicles.These safety recalls were issue on May 3, 2013 to address the improper function of the Generator Control Module (GCM) in certain model year (MY) 2012-13 Buick LaCrosse and Regal and MY 2013 Chevrolet Malibu Eco equipped with eAssist.This condition may result in a loss of battery charge, engine stall and/or inability for the vehicle to start.In severe cases it may also lead to odor, smoke and possibly a fire in the trunk.During discussions with General Motors (GM), ODI was informed that the subject vehicles could be separated into 4 distinct build populations, or groups. Group A contained vehicles built from the start of production through 3/19/2012.Group B involved vehicles built from 3/20/2012 to 8/20/2012, group C from 8/21/2012 to 12/31/12, and group D from 1/1/2013 onwards.Bulletin 13136 instructed dealers to inspect and, if necessary, replace the GCM for vehicles in groups A or C.Bulletin 13142 instructed dealers to replace the GCM of any vehicle in group B.Group D vehicles were not recalled.All eAssist vehicles have a Powerpack which contains a BAS (belt alternator-starter) Power Inverter Module (BPIM)/Accessory Power Module (APM) and a 115-V Lithium-Ion battery.The Powerpack is known by GM's Part Description System as the GCM and Battery Module. The BPIM/APM contains 3 multi-layered printed circuit boards (PCBs) comprised of conductive layers separated by isolating layers.Vehicles built within the time periods of groups A and B had PCBs using single isolation layers.Vehicles build in group C had dual isolation layers on 1 of the 3 PCBs, and group D had all 3 PCBs built with dual insulation.Adding dual insulation to a PCB makes it more robust to material and manufacturing variations, and ultimately less susceptible to an electrical short circuit and subsequent failure.Through initial analysis of the GCM failures, GM identified that vehicles within group B contained PCBs that were contaminated during production due to increased production volumes that resulted in inadequate quality control.GM also noted that GCM failures occurred early in the life of the vehicle (typically <1000 miles).Therefore a service procedure was developed to replicate early life failures by subjecting the GCM to high current loads which would cause the identified failure mechanism (copper migration) to occur quickly and reveal any underlying PCB defect.Although groups A and C were built with PCBs containing single layer PCBs, they were built using better quality control, and as the data supports, experienced significantly lower failures.GM advised that for these reasons the two different service procedures were used in the Recall 13V-173 population.In response to ODI's Information Request (IR) GM submitted 234 unique reports related to the alleged problem. It was noted that 197 (84%) of the received reports fell into the group B population.The 2 fire incidents noted were events in which flames were evident and/or damage was experienced outside of the GCM. Both of these incidents involved group B vehicles. One hundred four warranty claims were also submitted in response to the IR, with 96 claims (92%) from group B.It was also noted that none of the claims from groups A or C occurred after the service procedure was conducted, and that the majority of the A or C incidents occurred during the service procedure.Given the data, ODI believes the ser
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
Rear passenger side toe link did fracture causing vehicle to spin out of control.
- NHTSA ID
- 11750502
- Incident
- Jul 10, 2026
The contact owns a Safety 1st Car Seat, Model Name: Disney Baby Jive 2-in-1 Convertible, Model Number: CC286-GAD, Manufactured Date: August 17, 2022. The contact stated that the forward-facing safety seat head detached from the seat with the screws still attached. The contact attempted to tighten the screws; however, the screws required a special bit. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The car seat was not replaced.
- NHTSA ID
- 11682127
- Incident
- Aug 21, 2025
There is a water seal leak around the driver side headlight. I have photos showing proof of standing water. It has now caused the headlight, left turn signal, and drivers side brake light to fail. My passenger side headlight is doing the same. I have no headlights, no driverside lights period. I drive 2 children around in this car and it's gotten very dangerous. I contacted GM, and the local dealership and they won't fix it. I'm a [XXX] and don't have the $3200-$5000 I was told the repair would be. It is a problem in certain GM models, Cadillac Srx 2010-2015 having the same issue and the recall being fixed for those drivers. So, I have no choice but to drive around with no headlights, no left blinker, and no driver side brake light with two you children. I have to work and have no other options. It's a catastrophe waiting to happen, I live in the metropolitan area of Atlanta, Georgia. Please help me with this, I am terrified to drive this car around. I've had two people flag me down at a red light to let me know my brake light is out which is terribly dangerous and if it starts raining while I am out I have no headlights. This has become an emergency situation for me and my children. I have photo proof of the water pooling inside the headlight assembly. The seal is so bad that even covered the condensation pools inside the headlight. Please help me get a dealership to fix this issue. They want to charge me $275 for diagnostics and this is already and issue on this model car, reported by many drivers with the recall on the Cadillac. They need to fix it before I end up a casualty to this problem. Thank you so much. I can send a video of the emergency flasher and signal not working. I replaced the headlight in January and the new one never worked. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11676449
- Incident
- Jan 15, 2025
[XXX] my car failed to let me use the brake, i was going about 45mph and when i went to apply brake pressure the pedal was so stiff i couldnt use the brake. Causing from end collision, when i made a trip to springdale to have my car inspected it didnt make it, started backfiring and dying around 65 mph then the motor blew, it had some issues starting but nothing like what happened within that few seconds. Im out of a car now because it drove perfect and i never have to give it thought. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11627455
- Incident
- Nov 24, 2024
Hard to be able to control the vehicle due to something going on the rear
- NHTSA ID
- 11590501
- Incident
- May 9, 2024
2nd bad headlamp assembly that develops moisture and causes lamp to go out. First was passenger side now driver side
- NHTSA ID
- 11575316
- Incident
- Mar 4, 2024
The contact owns a 2012 Buick Regal. The contact stated that after starting the vehicle, he became aware that the electrical system was not functioning properly. No warning lights were illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, who diagnosed a failure with the body control module. The vehicle was repaired, but the failure reoccurred. After investigating the failure, the contact related it to NHTSA Campaign Number: 12V093000 (Exterior Lighting), but the VIN was not included. The manufacturer was notified of the failure but provided no assistance. The failure mileage was 16,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11552125
- Incident
- Feb 15, 2023
- Mileage
- 16,000 mi
The driver headlight assembly has water in it and unable to fix it without replacing whole assembly that can be as much as $1500. The light bulb and valance was replaced. The valance was filled with water. The headlight still wouldn’t work. Upon further investigation there is a part sealed into the assembly that also has water in it with no way to get it out or replace. This is a safety risk since i am unable to see on driver side in dark without my light. There are no recalls but have found many complaints on same issue. The part water is in is sealed and shouldn’t have a way for to get in. The only fix is replacing entire assembly. I have no light at all on that side until fixed.
- NHTSA ID
- 11546680
- Incident
- Sep 26, 2023
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
This document provides the technician with a diagnostic tip if the vehicle stalls and set diagnostic trouble code P0191 and may also set P0172. The diagnostic tip has the technician inspect the high pressure fuel pump body markings to confirm it is an original manufacture part. If it is not an original manufacture part, they should install one and evaluate the vehicle.
This preliminary information communicates information about how to determine if a wheel and tires size change is available.
This Preliminary information communicates the steps on how to save a GDS2 Session Log and upload to a Technical Assistance Case in CX Connect.
This preliminary information advises a dealer on how to email GDS2 session logs into Technical Assistance.
This preliminary information advises a dealer on how to email GDS2 session logs into Technical Assistance.
This Preliminary Information communication provides information to the technician about vehicles that have had multiple repair attempts that are being performed on customer’s vehicles that exhibit vibration conditions without utilizing the support of General Motors Technical Assistance Center. If valid vibration frequency or Road Force Variation data has been collected and a repair attempt does not correct the customer complaint, contact General Motors Technical Assistance Center for further support. For any vehicles that remains unrepaired after being at the dealer for three days or more and a related bulletin or PI is not found, contact General Motors Technical Assistance Center for further support.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2019 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 39.3 |
| 2018 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 62.9 |
| 2017 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 37.8 |
| 2016 | 41 | 1 | 0 | 34.9 |
| 2015 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 35.7 |
| 2014 | 38 | 2 | 0 | 47.9 |
| 2013 | 91 | 6 | 2 | 62.0 |
| 2012Viewing | 92 | 7 | 2 | 57.9 |
| 2011 | 279 | 4 | 0 | 49.9 |
| 2010 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2009 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2008 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2005 | 4 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2004 | 66 | 4 | 0 | 45.0 |
| 2003 | 101 | 5 | 0 | 55.9 |
| 2002 | 117 | 5 | 2 | 63.8 |
| 2001 | 187 | 8 | 2 | 67.5 |
| 2000 | 184 | 10 | 3 | 66.7 |
| 1999 | 246 | 8 | 3 | 66.4 |
| 1998 | 302 | 7 | 6 | 66.0 |
| 1997 | 136 | 8 | 6 | 65.3 |
| 1996 | 204 | 4 | 6 | 65.9 |
| 1995 | 173 | 8 | 1 | 60.0 |
| 1994 | 110 | 3 | 0 | 49.2 |
| 1993 | 85 | 2 | 2 | 60.5 |
| 1992 | 144 | 2 | 2 | 58.7 |
| 1991 | 200 | 7 | 10 | 64.0 |
| 1990 | 77 | 9 | 10 | 66.8 |
| 1989 | 106 | 8 | 11 | 66.1 |
| 1988 | 123 | 11 | 12 | 66.9 |
| 1987 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 62.1 |
| 1986 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 70.0 |
| 1985 | 9 | 9 | 6 | — |
| 1984 | 6 | 5 | 3 | — |
| 1983 | 4 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1982 | 1 | 2 | 1 | — |
| 1981 | 0 | 3 | 1 | — |
| 1980 | 0 | 6 | 1 | — |
| 1979 | 3 | 5 | 1 | — |
| 1978 | 1 | 7 | 2 | — |
| 1977 | 0 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1976 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1975 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1974 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1973 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.