SUSPENSION:REAR
2013 Cadillac Srx
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
NHTSA has issued a “do not drive” advisory affecting this model year.
Campaign 21V473000. Confirm whether your specific vehicle is covered using its VIN before acting on this.
Check your VIN on NHTSA.govOverview
Our database contains 393 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2013 Cadillac Srx, most frequently naming the exterior lighting, electrical and driver assistance categories. 5 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; 1 NHTSA investigation names it; and 2,005 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 9 | 246 |
| Feb 2020 | 8 | 254 |
| Mar 2020 | 6 | 260 |
| May 2020 | 5 | 265 |
| Jun 2020 | 3 | 268 |
| Jul 2020 | 4 | 272 |
| Aug 2020 | 2 | 274 |
| Sep 2020 | 1 | 275 |
| Oct 2020 | 3 | 278 |
| Nov 2020 | 7 | 285 |
| Dec 2020 | 6 | 291 |
| Jan 2021 | 2 | 293 |
| Feb 2021 | 1 | 294 |
| Mar 2021 | 2 | 296 |
| Apr 2021 | 2 | 298 |
| May 2021 | 3 | 301 |
| Jun 2021 | 1 | 302 |
| Jul 2021 | 1 | 303 |
| Aug 2021 | 8 | 311 |
| Sep 2021 | 7 | 318 |
| Oct 2021 | 3 | 321 |
| Nov 2021 | 2 | 323 |
| Dec 2021 | 7 | 330 |
| Jan 2022 | 3 | 333 |
| Feb 2022 | 2 | 335 |
| Mar 2022 | 4 | 339 |
| Jun 2022 | 2 | 341 |
| Jul 2022 | 1 | 342 |
| Sep 2022 | 1 | 343 |
| Oct 2022 | 1 | 344 |
| Nov 2022 | 1 | 345 |
| Dec 2022 | 5 | 350 |
| Feb 2023 | 3 | 353 |
| Mar 2023 | 3 | 356 |
| Apr 2023 | 2 | 358 |
| May 2023 | 3 | 361 |
| Jul 2023 | 1 | 362 |
| Aug 2023 | 1 | 363 |
| Sep 2023 | 1 | 364 |
| Oct 2023 | 1 | 365 |
| Nov 2023 | 1 | 366 |
| Feb 2024 | 1 | 367 |
| Apr 2024 | 1 | 368 |
| May 2024 | 1 | 369 |
| Jun 2024 | 2 | 371 |
| Jul 2024 | 1 | 372 |
| Oct 2024 | 2 | 374 |
| Nov 2024 | 2 | 376 |
| Jan 2025 | 1 | 377 |
| Feb 2025 | 1 | 378 |
| Mar 2025 | 2 | 380 |
| Apr 2025 | 2 | 382 |
| Jun 2025 | 1 | 383 |
| Jul 2025 | 1 | 384 |
| Aug 2025 | 1 | 385 |
| Oct 2025 | 2 | 387 |
| Nov 2025 | 1 | 388 |
| Jan 2026 | 3 | 391 |
| May 2026 | 1 | 392 |
| Jun 2026 | 1 | 393 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Exterior lighting21748.2%
- Electrical5211.6%
- Driver assistance347.6%
- Powertrain (other)286.2%
- Visibility184.0%
- Engine173.8%
- Suspension163.6%
- Brakes132.9%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
5 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSUSPENSION:REAR
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION:CONTROL MODULE (TCM/PCM/TECM)
Safety investigations
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
Rear Toe Link Adjuster Separation
On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
Valentine day a car side swiped me on the 91 freeway my car went out of control but I was able to get control of the vehicle driver side got banged up from the back bumper all the way to the driver side front fender.
- NHTSA ID
- 11745817
- Incident
- Feb 14, 2026
The exterior lighting does not light up as warranted. It is impossible to see at night due to the lack of lighting from the headlights. The problem was confirmed with the dealership, however I was told to replace the bulbs which I had done. Replacing the bulbs did not fix the issue so I went back to the dealership and told them again. I was told I would have to replace the entire headlight unit in order for the exterior lights to work properly and that I would have to pay for it. It is extremely dangerous to myself and others if I’m driving at nite and I cannot see anything. There were no warning lamps, messages or other symptoms prior to the failure of the headlights.
- NHTSA ID
- 11739637
- Incident
- May 2, 2016
I was driving and had to hard brake as to not hit a young driver who wasn't paying attention to his driving. The brake pedal went all the way to the floor. There were no warning lights on. I got the car checked out by our local mechanic AND a certified Cadillac dealer. We had a new master cylinder and O ring installed in October. Our mechanic found there is a special bulletin on 18 different vehicles with the same issue. And my Cadillac is on that list. I don't understand how this problem CAN'T be a total recall and just a special bulletin. My safety was totally at risk as the brake system was not working properly. Now with that being the Chevy/Cadillac dealership found that there is a problem with the ABS module. Which can not be found anywhere but a third party vendor. After paying almost $400 for the master cylinder and O ring the problem seemed to be fixed but now we have to pay ABS module. I know as the NHTSA can't refund any monies but GM should be held accountable for this issue and should pay for any repairs and parts to fix this dangerous issue. I have kept my receipts so that I can be reimbursed. Thank you, [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11713063
- Incident
- Oct 9, 2025
The contact owns a 2013 Cadillac SRX. The contact stated that while driving at night, the headlights failed to properly illuminate the roadway, limiting the driver’s vision while driving. The contact stated that the passenger’s side headlight was inoperable, and the driver’s side headlight was very dim. Due to the failure, the contact was forced to use the high-beam headlights while driving at night. The vehicle was taken to a local dealer, and the contact was informed that there were no recalls on the VIN related to the failure. The contact was provided with an estimate for the repair. Upon investigation, the contact discovered that there was a Class Action Lawsuit on similar vehicles for the failure. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 105,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11712074
- Incident
- Dec 3, 2025
- Mileage
- 105,000 mi
My father gave me his 2013 Cadillac SRX and I have noticed the headlights have dimmed significantly over the past few months. I replaced the lamps, but the same issue still exists. I spoke with my local Cadillac dealership and they told me of the known issue with the headlights. I did some research and see there was a class action lawsuit against Cadillac, but it does not seem to apply to vehicles registered in Wisconsin. I will need to correct this problem as driving at night has now become very difficult. If you have history of this issue with other drivers, any insight or direction would be much appreciated. Thank you for your time. [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11710185
- Incident
- Jan 10, 2026
Vehicle Headlamps fail to project adequate light to see the road. Several hundred dollars have been invested in attempting to fix this, resulting in zero noticeable help.
- NHTSA ID
- 11697680
- Incident
- Aug 16, 2021
While driving steering becomes unresponsive for a few seconds then returns to normal
- NHTSA ID
- 11695646
- Incident
- Oct 25, 2025
Left front headlight is so dim I cannot drive my car in the dark. I have spent money replacing the bulbs, cleaning the lenses through professional shop(s) and still goes dim and unsafe. After researching this I see this is a ongoing problem with this vehicle. I am now having to spend over $1,000 to replace the entire headlight assembly and I don't even know how long that will last. From research from another person it looks like the assembly where the light get hot is chrome sprayed plastic. Cheap parts causing me so much money that should be reliable in my vehicle. I see GM reimbursement owners in Fl and CA for this issue for a few years. this is terrible as I am a working adult required to commute in the dark. Iw ant to be reimbursed for this unsafe headlight assembly and know the other is failing too.
- NHTSA ID
- 11693034
- Incident
- Mar 3, 2025
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
This preliminary information communicates information about how to determine if a wheel and tires size change is available.
This Preliminary information communicates the steps on how to save a GDS2 Session Log and upload to a Technical Assistance Case in CX Connect.
This preliminary information advises a dealer on how to email GDS2 session logs into Technical Assistance.
This preliminary information advises a dealer on how to email GDS2 session logs into Technical Assistance.
This Preliminary Information communication provides information to the technician about vehicles that have had multiple repair attempts that are being performed on customer’s vehicles that exhibit vibration conditions without utilizing the support of General Motors Technical Assistance Center. If valid vibration frequency or Road Force Variation data has been collected and a repair attempt does not correct the customer complaint, contact General Motors Technical Assistance Center for further support. For any vehicles that remains unrepaired after being at the dealer for three days or more and a related bulletin or PI is not found, contact General Motors Technical Assistance Center for further support.
New Vehicle Monitoring Programs Section in IVH
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.