AIR BAGS:CRITICAL FASTENERS
2026 BMW X5
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 31 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2026 BMW X5, most frequently naming the driver assistance, electrical and body & structure categories. 2 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 28 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 2026 | 2 | 2 |
| Feb 2026 | 1 | 3 |
| Mar 2026 | 1 | 4 |
| Apr 2026 | 1 | 5 |
| Jun 2026 | 3 | 8 |
| Jul 2026 | 4 | 12 |
| Aug 2026 | 6 | 18 |
| Sep 2026 | 6 | 24 |
| Oct 2026 | 5 | 29 |
| Nov 2026 | 2 | 31 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Driver assistance1127.5%
- Electrical1127.5%
- Body & structure410.0%
- Powertrain (other)410.0%
- Engine37.5%
- Fuel system25.0%
- Interior & seats25.0%
- Brakes25.0%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
2 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govVISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD:CRITICAL FASTENERS
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
VEHICLE SAFETY MALFUNCTION & SYSTEM FAULT REPORT CRITICAL SAFETY ALERT: UNCOMMANDED STEERING MALFUNCTION This document constitutes a formal notification of a severe, life-threatening safety defect involving spontaneous, unprompted steering torque commands that forced the vehicle off the road and into oncoming traffic lanes. Vehicle Year / Model: 2026 BMW X5 Date of Report: Primary System Fault: Driving Assistant Professional (DAPP) / Highway Assist / KAFAS Camera Module Secondary System Fault: Automatic High Beam Assistant Failure 1. Description of Safety Incidents While operating the vehicle on [XXX] south of [XXX], the vehicle experienced three (3) distinct, severe uncommanded steering intervention events within a short driving window before the automated systems were manually disabled for driver safety. The specific conditions were as follows: Lighting/Environmental Conditions: The failures occurred uniformly during low-contrast, twilight conditions ("just before dark"). System State: The automated Level 2+ hands-free driving feature (Highway Assist) was active and engaged. No dash errors or system alerts were shown prior to the steering jerks. • • Malfunction Behavior: Upon approaching intermittent median left-turn lanes where center line markings widen and alter, the steering wheel violently and sharply yanked without warning. Two events directed the vehicle toward the roadside ditch; one event forcefully yanked the steering wheel toward the oncoming traffic lane. In all instances, immediate manual human force was required to physically override the steering rack motor and prevent a high-speed collision. 2. Correlative System Fault (Windshield Camera Cluster Link) Immediately following the third steering event, further down the highway, the vehicle's Automatic High Beam Assistant completely ceased to function. The green high beam indicator with the "A SEE ATTACHED FILE FOR COMPLETE LETTER INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11776452
- Incident
- Nov 5, 2026
My fiancée and I recently purchased a 2026 BMW X5 Plug-In Hybrid, which came equipped with BMW's Parking Assistant system, including the Recorded Path Parking feature. Unfortunately, our experience with this feature has been extremely disappointing and, more importantly, resulted in property damage. My fiancée had successfully used the Recorded Path Parking feature at least 30 times without incident. I had also used it several times. However, during one particular use, while I was seated in the driver's seat and my fiancée was in the passenger seat, the system malfunctioned in a very concerning way. The X5, using the Recorded Path Parking, began reversing up our long driveway and through the narrow entrance of our RV garage. Instead of stopping as it approached an obstruction, the vehicle continued reversing. In fact, during the final seconds, it appeared to accelerate, increasing its speed by approximately 2–3 mph before striking our UTV. The collision caused damage to our newly purchased BMW X5. What makes this incident particularly concerning is that the vehicle gave us no meaningful warning that something was wrong. There was no vibration, no red warning lights, or any other apparent indication that the system was malfunctioning. The vehicle's normal green indicators continued to suggest that the Recorded Path Parking function was operating as intended. I immediately contacted BMW and escalated my concerns to its Engineering Department. I provided BMW with video footage of the incident and specifically requested that they retrieve and examine the vehicle's Event Data Recorder (EDR) information to establish exactly what happened, including the vehicle's speed and braking activity during the event. Initially, BMW agreed to investigate the recorded event. However, they subsequently changed their position and declined to retrieve the information themselves, suggesting that I find and pay a third party to pull the EDR information. I strongly disagreed.
- NHTSA ID
- 11775039
- Incident
- Oct 14, 2026
on 3 occasions the corner of the tailgate, while closing, struck the top of my head and did not retract. Very painful. The force was adequate to cause serious injury. I'm a physician. if I had been taking anticoagulant therapy (blood thinners) the impact was enough to potentially cause a bleed inside the brain. After the even I reproduced the even, allowing the corner of the gate to close on a flat bathroom scale. again it did not stop and forced the scale out of my hands, recording 30 pounds. did not retract. Took to the dealer and they said everything function normally. at the center of the gate, it retracted. however providing resistance at the corner, the gate didn't stop until considerable resistance was applied. It just seems with the sensitivity at this level an individual, particularly an elderly "little old lady" could sustain a very significant injury. I suspect there is a sensitivity adjustment in the control software on the spindle motor that raises and lowers the gate. If all X5 gates do this, IMO, it is a design flaw. Just tested it again. at least 10 - 15 lbs of resistance was needed to stop the gate
- NHTSA ID
- 11774200
- Incident
- Oct 1, 2026
An alert came on the screen suddenly when I tried to start the vehicle on oct 5 2026 saying there was a drivetrain malfunction it was unable to start and that there was possible high voltage and it needed service immediately. It required tow to bmw service center and as of Oct 6 2026 they say it requires a software update that does not yet exist.
- NHTSA ID
- 11772577
- Incident
- Oct 5, 2026
This is a brand new vehicle with fewer than 4000 miles on the odometer. The Panoramic Sunroof shattered without any foreign object or projectile being the cause of the explosive nature of the damage. No other marks anywhere on the car. It is clear that from the remaining broken glass left behind in the frame the panoramic roof was pushed up and not struck from above.
- NHTSA ID
- 11771166
- Incident
- Oct 13, 2026
The contact owns a 2026 BMW X5. The contact stated that while stopped at a red light with the brake pedal depressed, the vehicle unexpectedly moved forward. Additionally, while the vehicle was parked and turned off, the vehicle unintendedly accelerated. The vehicle was taken to a local dealer, where the failure was reproduced. The dealer acknowledged failure and provided the contact with a loaner vehicle. The dealer was awaiting guidance from an engineer regarding the failure and the repair. The manufacturer was contacted by phone and email. The approximate failure mileage was 4,800.
- NHTSA ID
- 11769278
- Incident
- Sep 22, 2026
- Mileage
- 4,800 mi
Vehicle: 2026 BMW X5 xDrive50e (VIN: [your VIN], mileage at delivery: [X]) Shortly after taking delivery on [date] from Ferman BMW in Tampa, FL, I experienced an issue with the hybrid/EV operation: [describe exactly what happens — e.g., hybrid system warning light, loss of electric drive, unexpected behavior — be specific and factual]. I reported it immediately to the dealer and to BMW Customer Relations (case #[9344973]). The issue has not been resolved. I am concerned about [safety angle — e.g., sudden loss of propulsion power while driving]. BMW has not offered a repair or replacement vehicle — only a standard trade-in that would cost me approximately $18,000, which I declined.
- NHTSA ID
- 11769004
- Incident
- Oct 1, 2026
On August 16, 2026, while using the Automatic Parking/Parking Assistant feature on my 2026 BMW X5 M60i, the vehicle was performing an automated reverse parking maneuver. During the maneuver, the vehicle suddenly and unexpectedly accelerated backward toward a vehicle parked behind me and struck it. The acceleration occurred while the Parking Assistant system was controlling the maneuver. Because of the sudden acceleration and short distance to the vehicle behind me, there was insufficient time to recognize the unexpected movement and intervene before impact. A passenger in my vehicle witnessed the incident. I reported the incident to BMW. BMW North America subsequently inspected the vehicle and advised that it performed multiple automatic parking maneuvers but was unable to reproduce the excessive speed. BMW stated that the cameras and obstacle-distance displays operated normally during its testing and that no malfunction was identified. BMW also provided the vehicle's EDR data. BMW states that the EDR recorded no event and therefore contains no speed, acceleration, throttle, brake, or other incident-specific data from the collision. Accordingly, BMW's subsequent testing does not establish what the vehicle was doing during the actual incident. BMW also initially advised that no video existed because Drive Recorder was not activated. However, my BMW ConnectedDrive account for this VIN shows “BMW Drive Recorder – Active.” I have asked BMW to clarify whether Drive Recorder itself was active but a particular recording setting or trigger was not enabled. The precise cause is UNKNOWN. My concern is a possible intermittent malfunction of the Automatic Parking/Parking Assistant system involving unexpected acceleration/speed control during an automated reverse parking maneuver.
- NHTSA ID
- 11767809
- Incident
- Aug 15, 2026
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
Water leaks onto the carpet from the heating and air conditioning (HVAC) system after the vehicle has hadprior HVAC system repairs.
VISIBILITY/WIPER
DELIVERY STOP: EXTERIOR MIRROR
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Apple devices operating with iOS 26.x may be unable to establish an Ultra-wide band (UWB) Bluetoothconnection with the affected vehicles. As a result, the device cannot be paired with the vehicle, preventingBluetooth-dependent functions associated with BMW Digital Key Plus from operating as intended. Note: BMW Digital Key NFC (Near Field Communication and Android devices are not affected!
SERVICE BRAKES
The Integrated Brake (IB) power supply cable is covered with mesh protection and contact with the brakeline causes wear on the protective coating of the brake line. This wear leads to corrosion on the brake line
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; ENGINE
Due to an implementation error in various OBD diagnostics in the vehicle's control units, in very rare cases itmay happen that stored fault memory codes (DTCs) and the MIL (warning light) are not automaticallydeleted even though the underlying malfunction has already been rectified. This does not comply with the statutory OBD specifications.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Although the rear bumper is not equipped with a rear fog light, the Park Distance Control (PDC) wiringharness includes an unused fog light connector located in an area exposed to moisture. During production, the connector was wrapped in black electrical tape, which does not provide sufficientprotection against moisture and may allow water to enter the wiring harness.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026Viewing | 31 | 2 | 0 | 60.8 |
| 2025 | 63 | 5 | 0 | 60.6 |
| 2024 | 145 | 8 | 0 | 54.7 |
| 2023 | 34 | 4 | 0 | 58.4 |
| 2022 | 73 | 1 | 1 | 61.6 |
| 2021 | 114 | 12 | 1 | 70.3 |
| 2020 | 114 | 11 | 1 | 73.2 |
| 2019 | 195 | 13 | 0 | 59.5 |
| 2018 | 73 | 6 | 3 | 64.5 |
| 2017 | 76 | 7 | 3 | 60.7 |
| 2016 | 74 | 6 | 3 | 64.4 |
| 2015 | 152 | 6 | 2 | 61.8 |
| 2014 | 99 | 8 | 2 | 66.1 |
| 2013 | 149 | 6 | 1 | 60.3 |
| 2012 | 271 | 10 | 1 | 56.3 |
| 2011 | 265 | 14 | 1 | 58.1 |
| 2010 | 124 | 14 | 1 | 56.3 |
| 2009 | 138 | 12 | 1 | 55.9 |
| 2008 | 215 | 10 | 0 | 50.2 |
| 2007 | 71 | 8 | 0 | 49.2 |
| 2006 | 169 | 2 | 1 | 56.9 |
| 2005 | 82 | 3 | 0 | 51.7 |
| 2004 | 64 | 4 | 0 | 54.3 |
| 2003 | 99 | 3 | 0 | 53.3 |
| 2002 | 102 | 3 | 0 | 51.3 |
| 2001 | 160 | 12 | 0 | 56.7 |
| 2000 | 29 | 6 | 0 | 50.7 |
| 1999 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.