POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
2018 Ford Expedition
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 369 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2018 Ford Expedition, most frequently naming the powertrain (other), engine and electrical categories. 14 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; 1 NHTSA investigation names it; and 165 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 2021 | 1 | 68 |
| Sep 2021 | 1 | 69 |
| Oct 2021 | 1 | 70 |
| Nov 2021 | 4 | 74 |
| Dec 2021 | 1 | 75 |
| Jan 2022 | 1 | 76 |
| Feb 2022 | 1 | 77 |
| Mar 2022 | 4 | 81 |
| Apr 2022 | 2 | 83 |
| May 2022 | 4 | 87 |
| Jun 2022 | 5 | 92 |
| Aug 2022 | 3 | 95 |
| Sep 2022 | 8 | 103 |
| Oct 2022 | 3 | 106 |
| Nov 2022 | 1 | 107 |
| Dec 2022 | 1 | 108 |
| Jan 2023 | 3 | 111 |
| Feb 2023 | 10 | 121 |
| Mar 2023 | 5 | 126 |
| Apr 2023 | 3 | 129 |
| May 2023 | 6 | 135 |
| Jun 2023 | 2 | 137 |
| Jul 2023 | 4 | 141 |
| Aug 2023 | 12 | 153 |
| Sep 2023 | 9 | 162 |
| Oct 2023 | 8 | 170 |
| Nov 2023 | 1 | 171 |
| Dec 2023 | 2 | 173 |
| Jan 2024 | 8 | 181 |
| Feb 2024 | 6 | 187 |
| Mar 2024 | 1 | 188 |
| Apr 2024 | 6 | 194 |
| May 2024 | 1 | 195 |
| Jun 2024 | 12 | 207 |
| Jul 2024 | 5 | 212 |
| Aug 2024 | 11 | 223 |
| Sep 2024 | 9 | 232 |
| Oct 2024 | 4 | 236 |
| Nov 2024 | 3 | 239 |
| Dec 2024 | 2 | 241 |
| Jan 2025 | 5 | 246 |
| Feb 2025 | 8 | 254 |
| Mar 2025 | 5 | 259 |
| Apr 2025 | 12 | 271 |
| May 2025 | 11 | 282 |
| Jun 2025 | 13 | 295 |
| Jul 2025 | 12 | 307 |
| Aug 2025 | 7 | 314 |
| Sep 2025 | 4 | 318 |
| Oct 2025 | 5 | 323 |
| Nov 2025 | 2 | 325 |
| Dec 2025 | 5 | 330 |
| Jan 2026 | 3 | 333 |
| Feb 2026 | 3 | 336 |
| Mar 2026 | 6 | 342 |
| Apr 2026 | 4 | 346 |
| May 2026 | 4 | 350 |
| Jun 2026 | 4 | 354 |
| Jul 2026 | 14 | 368 |
| Aug 2026 | 1 | 369 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Powertrain (other)14232.3%
- Engine11726.7%
- Electrical337.5%
- Suspension245.5%
- Exterior lighting235.2%
- Driver assistance173.9%
- Brakes133.0%
- Body & structure133.0%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
14 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSTRUCTURE:INTERIOR PANELS:CENTER CONSOLE
SEAT BELTS:PRETENSIONER
Safety investigations
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
Seat Belt Retractor Pretensioner Inadvertent Deployment
On November 22, 2023, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Preliminary Evaluation (PE) PE23021 to investigate complaints of front seat belt retractor pretensioner inadvertent deployment in model year (MY) 2019 Ford Expedition vehicles manufactured by Ford Motor Company. Some complaints alleged hearing a loud, explosion-like sound immediately followed by the seat belt tightening around the occupant’s torso area. The complaints did not state that a crash occurred that may have resulted in the deployment of the pretensioner system, suggesting that this deployment was inadvertent or otherwise unwarranted. On February 9, 2024, Ford issued safety recall 24V-099, recalling certain MY 2018-2020 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator vehicles equipped with driver and front passenger seat belt retractor pretensioners built between October 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019. Ford described the defect as a seat belt retractor pretensioner assembly that may develop corroded squib pins, resulting in high resistance or an open circuit, which could result in an inadvertent deployment of a pretensioner and an increased risk of injury due to the loss of the pretensioner’s protection and a seat belt that remains in the locked position. This recall includes 77,574 vehicles. On November 15, 2024, ODI opened this Recall Query (RQ24015) after receiving 3 complaints involving vehicles not included in recall 23V-099 but that alleged a similar failure. As a result of this investigation, Ford issued safety recall 25V-197 on March 28, 2025, to expand the scope of 24V-099 to include MY 2018-2020 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator vehicles equipped with driver and front passenger seat belt retractor pretensioners built between October 1, 2018, and July 31, 2020. This recall includes 105,322 vehicles, some of which are also included in 24V-099. Additionally, on May 23, 2025, Ford issued 25V-197 Amendment #1, which further expands the recall population’s scope for vehicles with build dates of September 2018. This amendment added 7,627 additional vehicles to the 25V-197 population. In response to ODI’s inquiries in RQ24015, Ford indicated that it cannot conclusively determine the root cause of the relevant failure. Ford was able to determine that certain pretensioners may develop corroded squib pins potentially resulting in inadvertent deployment, but it was unable to specify the cause of corrosion. Without a specific root cause, Ford assessed field performance of pretensioners to determine the scope of the recalls. ODI is aware of three vehicles that experienced pretensioner inadvertent deployment that are not included in either 25V-197 or 24V-099. Two of these vehicles are MY 2018 Lincoln Navigator vehicles built prior to October 1, 2018, and both experienced failures after more than six years of use/exposure while the recalled vehicles experienced higher rate of failures with less exposure. The remaining incident involves a MY 2021 Ford Expedition that was built after July 31, 2020. ODI is not aware of any other relevant failures in vehicles built after July 31, 2020. As such, ODI has not currently identified a safety defect trend for this issue in vehicles outside of the recalled populations. ODI will continue to monitor allegations of pretensioner inadvertent deployment in subject vehicles that are not included in 25V-197. In view of the safety recall action being taken by Ford, ODI is closing this Recall Query (RQ24015). The agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances. To review the reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
THERE IS A SEAT BELT RECALL AND 3 OTHER RECALLS THAT FORD CORP OFFICE AND THE DEALERSHIP IN HENDERSON NC TOLD ME THE PARTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE UNTIL 2027 AND I AM EXPECTED TO DRIVE THIS VEHICLE PLEASE HELP ME
- NHTSA ID
- 11756469
- Incident
- Aug 12, 2002
There is a recall on the catalytic converters of my year Expedition, but my check engine light came on at 86,000 miles, outside the 80,000 limit Ford put on the recall for the part. I think Ford should stand behind their product and the parts they are using, since the catalytic converters have failed on my car, my husbands expedition, and my dad’s ford 150.
- NHTSA ID
- 11753225
- Incident
- Jun 7, 2026
Failing Transmission, does not shift into the gear just hear grinding noise, after few seconds of it, transmission makes very hard shift. This takes place in all phases or driving leading to potentially very dangerous situation of the car not moving or stopping while crossing a street with upcoming traffic, crossing intersection or any other phase of driving. Visited few shops and was advised that Ford has a major problem with 10R80 Transmission and failing CDF Drum.
- NHTSA ID
- 11752826
- Incident
- Jul 25, 2026
Power Running boards. The running boards half deploy and stop. The running boards go up and down while the vehicle is in motion. When opening the doors the running boards deploy half way and stop causing the persons exiting the vehicle to step on and uneven surfaces, resulting in twisted ankles and persons falling to the ground. The running boards were seems to malfunction every few years, they were replaced by Latrobe Chevy Ford 3 years ago and are currently being replaced by Bud Smail Ford.
- NHTSA ID
- 11752796
- Incident
- Jul 1, 2026
The heater hose that feeds the front and rear heater cores ruptured while traveling at highway speeds on a main road. The engine coolant directly sprays onto the engine resulting in a steam cloud that can not be seen through, also rapidly overheating that motor. This caused a dangerous scenario where the driver can not see the road correctly through the steam cloud while trying to pull off of the highway with the engine over temp warnings flashing in the screen further adding to the panic.
- NHTSA ID
- 11752749
- Incident
- Jul 18, 2026
The chrome plating on the center console has peel up, causing a finger laceration when reaching into the cup holder.
- NHTSA ID
- 11752748
- Incident
- May 6, 2026
I am submitting this complaint regarding potential safety issues with my 2018 Ford Expedition Max Platinum. I purchased the vehicle from Sandy Sansing Chevrolet in Pensacola, Florida, and discovered several problems shortly after purchase that I believe may affect the vehicle's safe operation. Within days of purchasing the vehicle, it began displaying an intermittent **low oil pressure warning** while driving. Because a low oil pressure condition can lead to engine damage, loss of power, or engine failure, I believe this presents a potential safety concern. The dealership's inspection report completed before the sale states: **"Has multiple minor oil leaks, wet but not dripping yet."** I had the vehicle independently inspected by Firestone, which determined the oil leak was coming from the timing cover/timing case area and estimated approximately $3,000 in repairs. I am concerned that the documented oil leak and intermittent low oil pressure warning could increase the risk of engine failure while the vehicle is in operation. I have also experienced what I believe is a brake safety concern. Although the dealership's inspection report indicates the brakes and rotors had been serviced, the brake pedal feels unusually soft or spongy and requires more pedal travel and pressure than expected before the brakes engage. While the vehicle currently stops, I am concerned this condition could reduce braking performance or increase stopping distance. Additional issues include intermittent operation of the power running boards, a non-functioning rear window washer, and a detached rear window defroster electrical connection. I am submitting this complaint so NHTSA can determine whether these issues are isolated to my vehicle or may indicate a broader safety-related defect affecting other 2018 Ford Expedition vehicles. I can provide the dealership inspection report, Firestone inspection and repair estimate, photographs, and other supporting documentation upon request.
- NHTSA ID
- 11752452
- Incident
- Jun 29, 2026
I’ve had multiple instances happen but the two latest are — traveling down the highway when I switched lanes and accelerated moderately. The expedition downshifted and I heard a massive clunk. I had no power. Started coasting and adjusting myself so I could get to shoulder, and it shifted back into gear. Another instance, I was at a stop sign turning left onto a highway as I turned out onto the road, I had no power and it wouldn’t accelerate while a vehicle was quickly approaching from behind. I had to coast onto the shoulder to avoid being hit before it got power and carried on. These conditions create a significant safety risk because the vehicle may fail to accelerate when entering the highway, merging into traffic, crossing traffic, making left turns, or avoiding hazards.
- NHTSA ID
- 11752144
- Incident
- Jul 12, 2026
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
BACK OVER PREVENTION: REARVIEW SYSTEM BRAKING; BACK OVER PREVENTION: WARNINGS; LANE DEPARTURE: BLIND SPOT DETECTION
Advance Notice – Customer Satisfaction Program 25N17 Certain 2015-2025 Model Year Multiple Vehicle Lines Rear View Camera Replacement If Required After Dealer Evaluation
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
This article supersedes TSB 24-2165 to update the TSB Service Procedure. Some vehicles listed in the Model statement above may exhibit various SYNC performance related concerns including but not limited to: Display operation concerns Navigation inoperative Voice recognition concerns Phone connection issues Dropped phone connections Applink related performance Travel Link not present or showing incorrect traffic Slow system response NOTE: Ford has found some of the APIMs replaced and returned for inspection contained an outdated software level and the APIM did not require replacement. The customer concern may have been resolved by updating the APIM with latest level of software. The SYNC 3 universal thumb drive will be able to update the APIM software without the use of a scan tool and does not require the process to be monitored. Ford will be monitoring APIM replacements to confirm TSB directed software updates have been performed.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; POWER TRAIN
Some 2015-2021 Ford and Lincoln vehicles may exhibit an illuminated MIL with diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) P0011, P0012, P0014, P0015, P0016, P0017, P0018, P0019, P0021, P0022, P0024 and/or P0025. Pinpoint test HK in the Powertrain Control and Emissions Diagnosis (PC/ED) or in Section 303-14 of the Workshop Manual (WSM) has been updated to address this concern.
POWER TRAIN
This bulletin supersedes TSB 25-2132. Reason for update: update the Part List Description and Labor Times Description Some of the vehicles listed in the Model statement above may exhibit at least one of the following conditions: * Harsh engagement * Delayed engagement * Harsh shift * Delayed shift * Illuminated malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) with diagnostic trouble codes (DTC) P0751, P0752, P0756, P0757, P0761, P0762, P0766, P0767, P0771, P0772, P2700, P2701, P2702, P2703, P2704, P2705, P2707, P2708, P0729, P0731, P0732, P0733, P0734, P0735, P0736, P076F, P07D9, P07F6 and/or P07F7 stored in the powertrain control module (PCM) or transmission control module (TCM) This may be due to axial movement of the CDF clutch cylinder (7H351) sleeve causing hydraulic circuit leaks. NOTE: If internal transmission service is required to address a concern detected with the CDF clutch cylinder following this article, technicians should carefully inspect and replace other transmission components and flush transmission fluid cooler only as necessary to confirm proper function. Add a new line to the repair order
On your vehicle, the OBD monitoring system for the catalytic converter may not be operating as intended. The Malfunction Indicator Light (MIL) may illuminate on the instrument panel even though a catalytic converter repair may not be necessary.
Some 2018-2024 Expedition/Navigator vehicles equipped with 22 inch wheels, may exhibit an increased level of vibrations which can be felt while driving on a smooth road at speeds at or above 75 mph (120 km/h). Pinpoint Test G located in Workshop Manual (WSM), Section 204-04 has been developed to assist with diagnosis of this condition. When submitting a warranty claim, include all results from the Pinpoint Test.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2026 | 8 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 29 | 5 | 0 | 67.6 |
| 2024 | 71 | 7 | 0 | 62.5 |
| 2023 | 64 | 8 | 0 | 67.5 |
| 2022 | 109 | 12 | 1 | 62.5 |
| 2021 | 227 | 12 | 1 | 64.8 |
| 2020 | 384 | 18 | 2 | 68.8 |
| 2019 | 477 | 11 | 2 | 69.1 |
| 2018Viewing | 369 | 14 | 1 | 63.4 |
| 2017 | 354 | 4 | 0 | 59.5 |
| 2016 | 213 | 3 | 0 | 56.9 |
| 2015 | 164 | 3 | 0 | 57.2 |
| 2014 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 49.1 |
| 2013 | 92 | 0 | 1 | 45.7 |
| 2012 | 118 | 3 | 1 | 59.2 |
| 2011 | 71 | 0 | 1 | 45.7 |
| 2010 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 43.3 |
| 2009 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 43.1 |
| 2008 | 146 | 4 | 1 | 61.5 |
| 2007 | 215 | 2 | 1 | 49.4 |
| 2006 | 299 | 6 | 1 | 57.8 |
| 2005 | 315 | 5 | 1 | 55.5 |
| 2004 | 296 | 4 | 2 | 63.2 |
| 2003 | 615 | 6 | 1 | 60.9 |
| 2002 | 340 | 4 | 2 | 65.5 |
| 2001 | 577 | 10 | 6 | 69.6 |
| 2000 | 890 | 11 | 5 | 70.8 |
| 1999 | 946 | 9 | 5 | 65.2 |
| 1998 | 836 | 7 | 5 | 64.9 |
| 1997 | 853 | 9 | 7 | 66.6 |
| 1996 | 3 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 1995 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1994 | 4 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1993 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1992 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1991 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.