ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: INTEGRATED TRAILER BRAKE CONTROL; EXTERIOR LIGHTING:TAIL LIGHTS
2025 Ford Expedition
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 29 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2025 Ford Expedition, most frequently naming the driver assistance, brakes and interior & seats categories. 5 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 135 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2025 | 1 | 1 |
| Aug 2025 | 3 | 4 |
| Sep 2025 | 1 | 5 |
| Oct 2025 | 3 | 8 |
| Dec 2025 | 3 | 11 |
| Jan 2026 | 1 | 12 |
| Feb 2026 | 2 | 14 |
| Mar 2026 | 3 | 17 |
| Apr 2026 | 2 | 19 |
| May 2026 | 2 | 21 |
| Jun 2026 | 4 | 25 |
| Jul 2026 | 2 | 27 |
| Aug 2026 | 2 | 29 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Driver assistance919.6%
- Brakes613.0%
- Interior & seats510.9%
- Electrical510.9%
- Steering510.9%
- Powertrain (other)48.7%
- Other / unspecified36.5%
- Airbags24.3%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
5 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:POWER ASSIST:ELECTRIC:CONTROL MODULE
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:POWER ASSIST:ELECTRIC:CONTROL MODULE:SOFTWARE
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
On August 11, 2026 at approximately 5:17 PM, the vehicle was traveling about 25–30 MPH and approaching a stop sign. The driver began braking normally, but the vehicle did not adequately slow despite repeatedly pressing the brake pedal. The vehicle continued completely through the stop sign and intersection. Fortunately, no cross traffic was present and no collision occurred. After passing through the intersection, the vehicle slowed while traveling uphill. At approximately 5 MPH, the electronic parking brake automatically applied by the vehicle and brought the vehicle to a stop. After being placed in Park, the vehicle would not shift out of Park and displayed multiple fault messages. FordPass recorded simultaneous faults for Antilock Brakes, Electronic Parking Brake, Powertrain Malfunction/Reduced Power, Pre-Collision Assist, and Blind Spot/Cross Traffic systems. One message specifically stated that the anti-lock brake system had detected a fault and was disabled. After several power cycles, the vehicle could be moved, but an orange wrench remained illuminated and cruise control was unavailable. After being shut down for approximately one hour, the warnings cleared and the vehicle appeared to operate normally. There were no warning lamps, messages, or braking symptoms before the failure occurred. Because the vehicle failed to respond normally to braking and traveled through an intersection, the incident created a serious risk of collision, injury, or death. The vehicle was subsequently towed to an authorized Ford dealership and is currently available for inspection. Dealer diagnosis is pending. The dealer has been asked to preserve the diagnostic trouble code/fault history and investigate the brake, electronic brake booster/ABS, electrical, and related control systems.
- NHTSA ID
- 11756496
- Incident
- Aug 11, 2026
The rear suspension oscillates and bounces violently over bumps, expansion joints, broken or uneven pavement, and washboard surfaces. It occurs at highway speed, at normal neighborhood speeds, and while slowing or coming to a stop over rough pavement. The rear suspension does not recover after a bump: it continues bouncing, the rear of the vehicle steps sideways, and steering correction is required to keep the vehicle in its lane. The condition is highly unpredictable. It does not occur on every bump and the driver cannot anticipate it, so there is no way to drive around it. Because it is intermittent, a short test drive may not reproduce it. On a recent drive on [XXX] south of Salt Lake City it occurred approximately 20 to 40 times over a seven mile stretch, with my wife driving. She has had to slow well below the posted 70 mph limit to maintain control. She will no longer drive the vehicle or transport our children in it. The vehicle was previously presented to an authorized Ford dealer for this concern and the condition was not corrected. It has worsened since. We have stopped driving it and had it towed to the dealer on August 11, 2026 because we do not consider it safe to drive. The vehicle is at the dealer now and is available for inspection. The manufacturer has opened a case and a repurchase review. No warning lamps or messages have appeared. The vehicle is completely stock with no aftermarket suspension, wheels, or tires. This is a loss of control risk at highway speed to my family and to other road users. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11756339
- Incident
- Aug 5, 2026
The pre collision avoidance system doesn’t activate at all even though the adaptive cruise control works properly. Has been seen and evaluated by Dealership technician as well as having a Ford engineer remotely logged into the vehicle. All modules have been updated and the issue still isn’t resolved. I was told by the dealership to take it to a different dealer or figure it out on my own.
- NHTSA ID
- 11749778
- Incident
- Jul 6, 2026
The contact owns a 2025 Ford Expedition. The contact stated that while the vehicle was parked with the parking brake activated, the contact’s wife returned to the vehicle and became aware that the vehicle had rolled away and crashed into a parked vehicle. There was no warning light illuminated prior to failure. There was no injury sustained. The dealer was contacted; however, the vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The contact mentioned the vehicle was serviced prior to the failure for a tailgate issue, where the vehicle was reprogrammed. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 16,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11747639
- Incident
- May 14, 2016
- Mileage
- 16,000 mi
I bought a new 2025 Ford Expedition Max King Ranch back in February. After driving it for awhile.....it was noticed that the front windshield is defective (star shape or spackling) and have been reported to the dealership that I bought from and another dealership way closer to me (West Hills Ford). This is making it hard to drive and it a safety issue also. You only see it at sunrise and sunset. West Hills said they see it no one, even myself can get a picture of it. With that FORD is denying the replacement, even tho it is still under warranty. They're basically telling to go pack sand because they need a picture, instead of taking the word of myself and even the service department at West Hills. I paid almost $100, 000 for this vehicle and I'm being treated like [XXX].....sorry for the language. r/ [XXX] [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11745669
- Incident
- Feb 13, 2026
While parked overnight, the panoramic sunroof shattered upwards. There is zero evidence of an impact. While opening door to stand on retractable running boards to take a picture, the center area of glass collapsed into the SUV. Rain storms in area and had to immediately tarp roof. Was on vacation 13 hours from home. Had to drive home at 60 MPH and re-tarp the sunroof in excess of 5 times. If this happened while driving there would have been dramatic impact to driver distraction and family sitting underneath the sunroof.
- NHTSA ID
- 11745537
- Incident
- Jun 18, 2026
This was a rental vehicle hybrid, while driving on a highway, the vehicle first developed a flat tire. Afterward, while the vehicle was in motion, smoke appeared and the vehicle caught fire spontaneously. There was no collision or impact of any kind. The driver pulled over and all passengers exited safely. The fire spread very rapidly and it's a total loss. The fire department responded and extinguished the fire. The fire appears to have originated in the hybrid battery area. The were no warnings. Safety risk: the fire occurred while vehicle was moving on a public highway with occupants inside, and spread very quickly after stopping. The Highway Patrol attended the scene and a police report was filled, incident documented. I'm reporting this as a serious safety concern.
- NHTSA ID
- 11743790
- Incident
- Jun 12, 2026
The metal emblem on the driver and passenger seats continuously pulls my hair. I believe it is the emblem itself (sharp lettering) and not how it is adhered to the seat. I am unable to drive the vehicle with hair down.
- NHTSA ID
- 11743630
- Incident
- Nov 30, 2025
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; VISIBILITY/WIPER
Some of the vehicles listed in the Model statement above equipped with one-touch up/down windows may exhibit a condition where a window does not respond to one-touch controls, does not open all the way and/or bounces back when using the one-touch close function.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Quality improvements include: -Minor infotainment system enhancements
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Quality improvements include: -Addresses key off load battery usage caused by the Telematics Control Unit's Wi-Fi not powering down properly when when the vehicle goes to sleep
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
Some 2021-2026 Ford/Lincoln vehicles may exhibit various symptoms including but not limited to the auto start/stop system not operating as intended with a "Check Charging System" message in the instrument panel cluster (IPC) while the charging system is operating properly with no charging related diagnostic trouble codes (DTC) stored. This may be due to someone using an aftermarket programmer to change the body control module (BCM) configuration to disable the auto start/stop system or perform other unsupported programming modifications. To correct this condition on F-150 and Bronco vehicles, download and run the Ford Diagnosis and Repair System (FDRS) application titled "BCM-Charging System Configuration Correction". Running this application will determine if the BCM configuration was modified by the customer and if so, provide the option to return the configuration back to factory settings. For other vehicle models exhibiting concerns related to unsupported aftermarket BCM programming, submit a Technical Support Request (TSR) requesting support to revert the BCM configuration
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Quality improvements include: -Addresses key off load battery usage caused by the Seat Control Module waking up the bus at cold temperatures
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Quality improvements include: -Minor bug fixes
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2026 | 8 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2025Viewing | 29 | 5 | 0 | 67.6 |
| 2024 | 71 | 7 | 0 | 62.5 |
| 2023 | 64 | 8 | 0 | 67.5 |
| 2022 | 109 | 12 | 1 | 62.5 |
| 2021 | 227 | 12 | 1 | 64.8 |
| 2020 | 384 | 18 | 2 | 68.8 |
| 2019 | 477 | 11 | 2 | 69.1 |
| 2018 | 369 | 14 | 1 | 63.4 |
| 2017 | 354 | 4 | 0 | 59.5 |
| 2016 | 213 | 3 | 0 | 56.9 |
| 2015 | 164 | 3 | 0 | 57.2 |
| 2014 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 49.1 |
| 2013 | 92 | 0 | 1 | 45.7 |
| 2012 | 118 | 3 | 1 | 59.2 |
| 2011 | 71 | 0 | 1 | 45.7 |
| 2010 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 43.3 |
| 2009 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 43.1 |
| 2008 | 146 | 4 | 1 | 61.5 |
| 2007 | 215 | 2 | 1 | 49.4 |
| 2006 | 299 | 6 | 1 | 57.8 |
| 2005 | 315 | 5 | 1 | 55.5 |
| 2004 | 296 | 4 | 2 | 63.2 |
| 2003 | 615 | 6 | 1 | 60.9 |
| 2002 | 340 | 4 | 2 | 65.5 |
| 2001 | 577 | 10 | 6 | 69.6 |
| 2000 | 890 | 11 | 5 | 70.8 |
| 1999 | 946 | 9 | 5 | 65.2 |
| 1998 | 836 | 7 | 5 | 64.9 |
| 1997 | 853 | 9 | 7 | 66.6 |
| 1996 | 3 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 1995 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1994 | 4 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1993 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1992 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1991 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.