LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES:TRUNK LID:LATCH
2018 Hyundai Sonata
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 373 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2018 Hyundai Sonata, most frequently naming the engine, electrical and powertrain (other) categories. 1 safety recall has been issued covering this model year; 2 NHTSA investigations name it; and 205 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2021 | 4 | 114 |
| Oct 2021 | 2 | 116 |
| Nov 2021 | 2 | 118 |
| Dec 2021 | 1 | 119 |
| Jan 2022 | 5 | 124 |
| Feb 2022 | 3 | 127 |
| Mar 2022 | 1 | 128 |
| Apr 2022 | 1 | 129 |
| May 2022 | 2 | 131 |
| Jun 2022 | 1 | 132 |
| Jul 2022 | 3 | 135 |
| Aug 2022 | 3 | 138 |
| Sep 2022 | 6 | 144 |
| Oct 2022 | 5 | 149 |
| Nov 2022 | 4 | 153 |
| Dec 2022 | 3 | 156 |
| Jan 2023 | 7 | 163 |
| Feb 2023 | 6 | 169 |
| Mar 2023 | 6 | 175 |
| Apr 2023 | 2 | 177 |
| May 2023 | 2 | 179 |
| Jun 2023 | 2 | 181 |
| Jul 2023 | 4 | 185 |
| Aug 2023 | 8 | 193 |
| Sep 2023 | 3 | 196 |
| Oct 2023 | 2 | 198 |
| Nov 2023 | 5 | 203 |
| Dec 2023 | 8 | 211 |
| Jan 2024 | 2 | 213 |
| Feb 2024 | 4 | 217 |
| Mar 2024 | 7 | 224 |
| Apr 2024 | 4 | 228 |
| May 2024 | 4 | 232 |
| Jul 2024 | 4 | 236 |
| Aug 2024 | 1 | 237 |
| Sep 2024 | 4 | 241 |
| Oct 2024 | 4 | 245 |
| Nov 2024 | 4 | 249 |
| Dec 2024 | 6 | 255 |
| Jan 2025 | 4 | 259 |
| Feb 2025 | 4 | 263 |
| Mar 2025 | 7 | 270 |
| Apr 2025 | 4 | 274 |
| May 2025 | 7 | 281 |
| Jun 2025 | 7 | 288 |
| Jul 2025 | 9 | 297 |
| Aug 2025 | 15 | 312 |
| Sep 2025 | 6 | 318 |
| Oct 2025 | 6 | 324 |
| Nov 2025 | 6 | 330 |
| Dec 2025 | 7 | 337 |
| Jan 2026 | 4 | 341 |
| Feb 2026 | 4 | 345 |
| Mar 2026 | 5 | 350 |
| Apr 2026 | 4 | 354 |
| May 2026 | 4 | 358 |
| Jun 2026 | 4 | 362 |
| Jul 2026 | 4 | 366 |
| Aug 2026 | 3 | 369 |
| Sep 2026 | 4 | 373 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Engine22345.7%
- Electrical6012.3%
- Powertrain (other)408.2%
- Fuel system336.8%
- Driver assistance306.1%
- Exterior lighting224.5%
- Brakes173.5%
- Body & structure163.3%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
1 campaign cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSafety investigations
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
Loss of Motive Power
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) received a letter dated July 13, 2022, petitioning the Agency to initiate a safety defect investigation into loss of motive power allegations attributed to oil drain pan assembly failures on certain Hyundai Motor America, Inc. and Kia America, Inc. vehicles spanning Model Years (MY) 2005-2021. The Petitioners cited examples of complaints indicating that the subject vehicles were experiencing rapid loss of engine oil due to oil drain plug back outs, resulting in loss of motive power and/or catastrophic engine damage. Additional complaints were provided which alleged that the oil drain pans lack sufficient structural integrity and are susceptible to cracking. The petition itself can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI number 11481745. On September 12, 2022, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Defect Petition (DP22-003) to evaluate the Petitioners’ request. The Petitioners have provided additional complaints within four supplemental letters dated January 31, 2023, March 21, 2023, May 23, 2023, and August 4, 2023. ODI’s evaluation included the review and analysis of the complaints and supporting information submitted by the Petitioners, as well as additional complaints submitted directly to NHTSA which referenced either the oil drain plug or a crack in the oil pan. After reviewing the available data, ODI has not identified evidence that would support opening a defect investigation into the oil drain pan assemblies of the subject vehicles. Based on a review of the available information, a loss of motive power resulting from an oil drain plug back out has not occurred between the initial sale of a vehicle and the completion of its first oil change. If during an oil change service, a technician fails to remove the existing drain plug gasket before installing a new gasket, it is likely that a proper seal between the drain plug and the oil pan will not be made. An improper seal between the drain plug and oil pan could lead to the backing out on the drain plug, resulting in the sudden loss of oil while driving. Additionally, the provided examples of oil pan cracks were localized to the immediate vicinity of the oil drain plug and/or appeared to be the result of direct-contact with a tool during servicing. There is no information to support that a vehicle-based defect exists relating to the oil pan assembly, and instead the documented incidents are related to the failure to follow the proper maintenance procedures during oil change service. In October 2023, Hyundai published a Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) that provided detailed instructions for oil change service on its gasoline powered vehicles, specifically highlighting the need to remove and replace the existing drain plug gasket prior to reinstalling the drain plug. After a thorough review of the material submitted by the petitioner, the information already in NHTSA's possession, and the potential risks to motor vehicle safety implicated by the petitioners' allegations, NHTSA does not believe that a formal investigation is warranted. Therefore, the petition is denied. A Federal Register Notice (FRN) further detailing NHTSA’s reasons for denial of the petition will be published. The reference numbers for the complaints to NHTSA cited by the petitioner can be found in the petition submission documents in the public file for DP22-003. To review those complaints and the additional complaints ODI added to its evaluation which are cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.
Electrical overstress
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation to determine if the failure of airbags to deploy during severe crashes, in certain vehicles, was the result of a safety related defect. During the investigation a complex failure was studied that can result in non-deployment of subject vehicle air bags and other restraint system devices in severe crash events. The subject vehicles may be equipped with an airbag control unit (ACU) for the supplemental restraint system (SRS) Electronic Control Unit (ECU) manufactured by ZF-TRW. The ECU receives signals from crash sensors mounted in the vehicle and deploys the vehicle air bags and seat belt pretensioners in accordance with manufacturer design specifications. The ECU in the subject vehicles contains a model DS84 application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) which controls the communication of the crash sensor signal, firing commands (i.e., when to deploy the airbag(s) and/or pretensioners), and fault information (e.g., diagnostic trouble codes). In September 2016, FCA announced recall 16V-668 for certain model year (MY) 2010 to 2014 Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep products manufactured with the subject ZF-TRW ACU. In this recall, FCA discussed an EOS condition that resulted in a failure of the subject DS84 ASIC, which caused air bag non-deployment. FCA noted that the defect condition had only been observed in vehicles equipped with sensor harnessing routed across the front of the vehicle. Other FCA vehicles that also used the subject ACU, but were not equipped with cross-car harnessing, had not experienced EOS failures, despite similar time in service. During the course of this investigation, ODI sent two separate Information Request (IR) letters to six vehicle manufactures (including FCA, Hyundai, Honda, Kia, Mitsubishi, and Toyota) and one IR letter to ZF-TRW. These IR letters resulted in ODI receiving comprehensive data from these manufacturers and suppliers. Studies of this data found that the DS84 ASIC does not have sufficient protection against negative electrical transients or electrical overstress (“EOS”) that can be generated in certain severe crashes. An electrical transient occurs when the electrical power supplied to a circuit changes momentarily over a short duration of time. In these severe crash cases, the crash sensors and other powered wiring can be damaged and short circuited so as to create a negative electrical transient of sufficient intensity and duration (that are outside the vehicle manufacturer's specification) to damage the ASIC before the restraint device deployment signal is received by the SRS ECU. This damaged signal can lead to incomplete or nondeployment of the air bags and/or pretensioners. Airbag non-deployment and/or lack of pretensioner operation can increase the risk or severity of injury in a crash.A total of 8 fatalities and 14 injuries were associated with known EOS events. The common element in all investigated manufacturers vehicles is the SRS ECU containing a DS84 ASIC manufactured by ZF-TRW. The risk associated with the ASIC is equally shared among all OEMS involved in the investigation. The actual real-world risk can be mitigated by other factors which were assessed by ODI during this investigation. The first mitigating factor involves protections built into the ACU design which protect the DS84 ASIC from damage. There are multiple strategies and levels of protection employed by different OEMs that provide effective EOS mitigation. The two most common strategies at the ACU level are circuit protection diodes on the remote senor signal lines, and current limiting resistors that protect critical components. The second mitigating factor is found at the vehicle level and involves the location and routing of the wires leading from the crash sensors to the SRS ECU. If the wires are well protected in a crash and are not routed with other power wires carrying large currents, the risk for an EOS event is significantly reduced or eliminated. These design specific factors combine to produce a spectrum of risk for the vehicles equipped with ACUs using the DS84 ASIC. Given the many of years of field exposure, it is possible to divide the subject population into two groups; vehicles which have experienced EOS events, and vehicles which have not experienced EOS field events. Four of the six OEMs involved in this investigation have experienced EOS field events on at least one of their models equipped with a DS84 ASIC. All vehicle models (including the Toyota models identified in the Failure Report Summary of the opening resume for this investigation) with field events have been recalled. In an abundance of caution, ODI kept this investigation open five years to monitor field performance and did not identify any field events on vehicles not included in existing safety recalls. Given the spectrum of risk identified in this investigation and that all vehicles with a demonstrated unreasonable risk have been recalled, ODI is closing this investigation. ODI is closing this investigation with the following manufacturer safety recalls: 16V-668, 18E-043, 18V-137, 18V-363, and 20V-024. With the recall actions taken by the subject vehicle and equipment manufacturers, this investigation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exists on other model or model year vehicles outside of the recall scopes. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
Hyundai dealership confirms I am in need of a new engine due to large oil consumption which is a known issue on 2018 Hyundai Sonata engines. Hyundai will not approve repairs because I am the second owner and vehicle is out of the 5 year warranty period. I only have 52K miles on my vehicle.
- NHTSA ID
- 11765780
- Incident
- Sep 21, 2026
One engine valve has lost pressure and is not repairable
- NHTSA ID
- 11763562
- Incident
- Sep 9, 2026
Vehicle has been making a clunking noise (front passenger area). Brought to independent service center where they determined that the strut tower is failing. Current mileage 66000. Appt set for Checkered Flag Hyundai to evaluate on 9/11/2026.
- NHTSA ID
- 11762770
- Incident
- Feb 1, 2026
My car stalls while driving and then I try to restart it but nothing happens. After reading online about the fuel pump issues and extended warranty related to the fuel pump I took the car in for repair. My car has 75,000 miles and the extended repair on this is for 150,000 miles/15 years. The dealer is refusing the repair because my car has a branded/ theft title. The car wasn't damaged just stolen. This is creating a serious safety concern and should be repaired by the dealer. Thank you for your time.
- NHTSA ID
- 11762281
- Incident
- Sep 3, 2026
Since I had Service Campaign 9C2 completed, the car hesitates to start, does a mini-lurch upon cold start and runs rough. Two weeks ago, it was put in park, lurched backwards, then died. The starter and battery have been replaced but this has not helped. The car ran fine before this update was done.
- NHTSA ID
- 11759477
- Incident
- Jul 17, 2026
The paint on all parts of the car is completely coming off down to bare metal. It’s as if the car wasn’t prepped to receive paint. Every Hyundai I pass that’s white the paint is coming off. There is also an internal engine oil leak where I’m losing 4qts of oil a week.
- NHTSA ID
- 11757263
- Incident
- Jul 15, 2022
I recently had the 9C2 Emissions recall update performed on my car, and since the update my car drives like total garbage after a cold start. It hesitates to accelerate, it bucks when trying to accelerate, and it’s to the point the engine is about to stall. I took it back to the Hyundai dealership and they said they are aware of the issue, but there is no fix from Hyundai at this time. This is a major safety concern, as the car barely wants to accelerate after a cold start. Please have Hyundai fix this safety issue.
- NHTSA ID
- 11757253
- Incident
- Jul 14, 2026
The contact owns a 2018 Hyundai Sonata. The contact stated that while operating the vehicle, there was an abnormal fuel odor inside the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer and was diagnosed with an inoperable low-pressure fuel pump. The contact was informed that the low-pressure fuel pump needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not yet repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The contact stated that the manufacturer had issued an extended warranty coverage for the failure. The failure mileage was 92,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11752670
- Incident
- May 11, 2026
- Mileage
- 92,000 mi
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
Certain vehicles may exhibit excessive paint peeling or bubbling of the primer/paint film on the exterior metal body panels: hood, fender(s), roof, door(s), quarter panel(s), and tailgate/trunk. This warranty extension only applies to factory-applied paint and does not cover collision-related paint repairs or vehicles with a salvaged title. Hyundai is extending the warranty coverage for certain white paint colors under these conditions from 3 years and 36,000 miles, to 10 years with unlimited miles from the date of original retail delivery or date of first use, and is valid for original and subsequent owners.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; ENGINE
Certain Santa Fe (TMA), Santa Fe Sport (AN), Sonata (LFA), and Tucson (TL) vehicles equipped with Theta II engines may exhibit elevated engine-out emissions. The California Air Resources Board has determined that these vehicles may be releasing air pollutants which exceed Federal and California standards.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; ENGINE
Certain Santa Fe (TMA), Santa Fe Sport (AN), Sonata (LFA), and Tucson (TL) vehicles equipped with Theta II engines may exhibit elevated engine-out emissions. This bulletin provides instructions for updating the Engine Control Module (ECM) to address this condition.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; ENGINE
Following completion of Service Campaign 9C2 (Theta II Emissions Improvement), certain vehicles may exhibit a brief hesitation or rough shifting condition during cold start operation. If present, this condition is expected to occur only within approximately the first 1-3 minutes after engine start, while the catalyst is reaching its normal operating temperature.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; ENGINE
Following completion of Service Campaign 9C2 (Theta II Emissions Improvement), certain vehicles may exhibit a brief hesitation or rough shifting condition during cold start operation. If present, this condition is expected to occur only within approximately the first 1-3 minutes after engine start, while the catalyst is reaching its normal operating temperature.
Some Hyundai vehicles with exterior white paint may exhibit peeling or bubbling on metal body panels: hood, fender(s), roof, door(s), quarter panel(s), and tailgate/trunk. The paint warranty coverage for affected vehicles has been extended to 10 years/unlimited miles from the date of original retail delivery or date of first use and is valid for original and subsequent owners.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 37.0 |
| 2024 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 47.1 |
| 2023 | 87 | 2 | 0 | 54.1 |
| 2022 | 93 | 3 | 0 | 59.1 |
| 2021 | 133 | 4 | 1 | 64.7 |
| 2020 | 178 | 4 | 1 | 60.8 |
| 2019 | 161 | 0 | 2 | 56.3 |
| 2018Viewing | 373 | 1 | 2 | 57.2 |
| 2017 | 764 | 3 | 3 | 63.5 |
| 2016 | 725 | 6 | 4 | 67.8 |
| 2015 | 1,144 | 9 | 4 | 68.6 |
| 2014 | 746 | 7 | 7 | 67.9 |
| 2013 | 1,910 | 9 | 9 | 68.9 |
| 2012 | 1,556 | 8 | 7 | 66.0 |
| 2011 | 3,376 | 14 | 8 | 63.3 |
| 2010 | 345 | 2 | 3 | 55.7 |
| 2009 | 460 | 2 | 3 | 56.5 |
| 2008 | 425 | 5 | 4 | 59.3 |
| 2007 | 696 | 7 | 5 | 59.0 |
| 2006 | 1,047 | 11 | 5 | 59.2 |
| 2005 | 165 | 1 | 0 | 45.6 |
| 2004 | 202 | 1 | 1 | 51.3 |
| 2003 | 199 | 6 | 3 | 64.0 |
| 2002 | 319 | 7 | 4 | 64.6 |
| 2001 | 205 | 3 | 2 | 59.9 |
| 2000 | 276 | 4 | 2 | 59.4 |
| 1999 | 124 | 4 | 3 | 61.4 |
| 1998 | 49 | 1 | 0 | 40.2 |
| 1997 | 49 | 2 | 0 | 50.1 |
| 1996 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 36.9 |
| 1995 | 66 | 2 | 0 | 54.0 |
| 1994 | 3 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1993 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 36.4 |
| 1992 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 47.5 |
| 1991 | 29 | 1 | 2 | 57.2 |
| 1990 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 47.4 |
| 1989 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 63.4 |
| 1988 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 1987 | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 1986 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.