SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER
2005 Toyota Highlander
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 224 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2005 Toyota Highlander, most frequently naming the driver assistance, transmission and visibility categories. 6 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; 1 NHTSA investigation names it; and 159 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 2011 | 1 | 136 |
| Mar 2011 | 4 | 140 |
| Apr 2011 | 2 | 142 |
| May 2011 | 2 | 144 |
| Jun 2011 | 2 | 146 |
| Aug 2011 | 1 | 147 |
| Sep 2011 | 2 | 149 |
| Oct 2011 | 2 | 151 |
| Nov 2011 | 2 | 153 |
| Jan 2012 | 1 | 154 |
| Feb 2012 | 2 | 156 |
| Apr 2012 | 1 | 157 |
| May 2012 | 1 | 158 |
| Oct 2012 | 1 | 159 |
| Jan 2013 | 1 | 160 |
| Mar 2013 | 1 | 161 |
| Apr 2013 | 1 | 162 |
| Jun 2013 | 1 | 163 |
| Aug 2013 | 2 | 165 |
| Sep 2013 | 2 | 167 |
| Oct 2013 | 1 | 168 |
| Nov 2013 | 2 | 170 |
| Dec 2013 | 1 | 171 |
| Mar 2014 | 3 | 174 |
| Apr 2014 | 2 | 176 |
| May 2014 | 1 | 177 |
| Jun 2014 | 1 | 178 |
| Jul 2014 | 1 | 179 |
| Aug 2014 | 1 | 180 |
| Sep 2014 | 1 | 181 |
| Oct 2014 | 1 | 182 |
| Nov 2014 | 3 | 185 |
| Mar 2015 | 3 | 188 |
| Apr 2015 | 1 | 189 |
| May 2015 | 1 | 190 |
| Jun 2015 | 2 | 192 |
| Jul 2015 | 1 | 193 |
| Aug 2015 | 1 | 194 |
| Oct 2015 | 1 | 195 |
| Nov 2015 | 3 | 198 |
| Feb 2016 | 2 | 200 |
| Aug 2016 | 2 | 202 |
| Oct 2016 | 1 | 203 |
| Dec 2016 | 1 | 204 |
| May 2017 | 1 | 205 |
| Jun 2017 | 1 | 206 |
| Oct 2017 | 3 | 209 |
| Jan 2018 | 1 | 210 |
| Feb 2018 | 1 | 211 |
| Apr 2018 | 1 | 212 |
| Jan 2019 | 2 | 214 |
| Dec 2020 | 1 | 215 |
| Sep 2021 | 1 | 216 |
| Dec 2021 | 2 | 218 |
| Aug 2023 | 1 | 219 |
| Dec 2024 | 1 | 220 |
| Aug 2025 | 1 | 221 |
| Sep 2025 | 1 | 222 |
| Nov 2025 | 1 | 223 |
| Feb 2026 | 1 | 224 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Driver assistance4114.6%
- Transmission3111.1%
- Visibility2810.0%
- Electrical269.3%
- Steering269.3%
- Brakes248.6%
- Powertrain (other)186.4%
- Engine145.0%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
6 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:ACCELERATOR PEDAL
Safety investigations
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
Unintended and Uncontrolled Acceleration
On February 16, 2010, NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened RQ10-003 to determine whether the scope of prior Toyota recalls relating to potential unintended acceleration were sufficiently broad, including, among others, Toyota recalls 07E-082, 09V-388, 10V-017, and 10V-023.NHTSA also requested information regarding potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota and Lexus vehicles.I. Pedal Interference from Floor mats, Carpet Covers and Plastic Pads in Carpets.During the RQ10-003 investigation, ODI reviewed a large volume of documents to assess whether additional vehicles should be recalled.Following the agency's analysis, NHTSA requested that Toyota recall additional vehicles.Toyota complied with the agency's request.The details of these recalls are set forth more fully in Toyota's reports to NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573.These recalls are as follows:Recall 11V-112: (1) model year (MY) 2004-2006 Toyota Highlander and Highlander Hybrid; and, (2) MY 2004-2007 Lexus RX330,RX350, and RX400h (hybrid model). The total estimated population under this recall is 769,379 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by a loose floor carpet cover (trim panel). Recall 11V-113: (1) MY 2003-2009 through 2009 Toyota 4Runner; (2) MY 2006-2010 Toyota RAV4; and, (3) MY 2008-2011 Lexus LX570.The total estimated population under this recall is 1,381,000 vehicles.This recall supplements recall 09V-388 and remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment by an unsecured floor mat.Recall 11V-115: (1) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS300 (all wheel drive vehicles); and, (2) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS350 (all wheel drive vehicles). The total estimated population under this recall is 19,647 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by inadequate clearance between the pedal linkage and a plastic pad embedded in the vehicle's carpet.II. Potential Electronic Causes of Unintended Acceleration.After NHTSA opened RQ10-003, NHTSA launched a ten-month study of potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.NHTSA launched the study in the spring of 2010 in light of concerns aired in Congressional hearings.NHTSA enlisted engineers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) with expertise in areas such as computer controlled electronic systems, electromagnetic interference and software integrity to assess whether electronic systems or electromagnetic interference played a role in incidents of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.That study has concluded.Two reports are associated with the study and are available on NHTSA's website.NASA's report is entitled Technical Support to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on the Reported Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) Unintended Acceleration (UA) Investigation, NESC Assessment No. TI-10-00618 (Jan. 18, 2011).NHTSA's report is entitled Technical Assessment of Toyota Electronic Throttle Control (ETC) Systems (Feb. 2011).Both reports should be read in conjunction with each other. As stated in its report, NASA did not find an electronic cause of large throttle openings that can result in unintended acceleration incidents. NHTSA did not find a vehicle-based cause of unintended acceleration incidents other than the physical pedal interference causes that are being addressed by Toyota's recalls. This RQ is closed.
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
My 2025 Acura MDX (under 10,000 miles) has failed to restart after the automatic idle stop engaged at stoplights and drive-thru lines at least 7 separate times. When I release the brake, the engine often remains off and the vehicle will not move, leaving me stopped in traffic. I have not yet required a jump start, but on several occasions the vehicle came very close to not restarting at all. This most recently occurred at a sandwich shop drive-thru. These incidents occurred in normal drive mode and in normal weather conditions. No abnormal driving conditions were present when the failures happened. Other owners online report the same problem, with some needing to carry jumper cables. I believe this is a serious safety risk because the vehicle can stall unexpectedly in intersections and traffic when the auto stop-start system activates. I am now concerned about relying on this vehicle in traffic because I cannot trust it to restart when stopped.
- NHTSA ID
- 11716569
- Incident
- Feb 8, 2026
Odometer Fraud. The contact purchased a 2005 Toyota Highlander. The contact discovered that there was a mileage discrepancy after the purchase of the vehicle. The vehicle was a private sale. At the time of the purchase, the mileage was 123,000. It was later discovered upon checking Carfax that the mileage was 254,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11698883
- Incident
- Nov 12, 2025
- Mileage
- 254,000 mi
All at once the windows, moon roof, blinkers, reverse lights, running lights and brake lights stopped working - also the automatic headlight function stopped working and we must turn on and off the headlights or risk draining the battery. It's interesting to note that the flashers work, but the blinkers do not. The wipers, radio, cruise control, etc. are all fine. It appears all fuses associated with these items are intact - I don't know how to check the viability of the relays, but have been told it could be a relay and or a ground wire. I've purchased a new multifunction blinker headlight replacement switch AND a master window replacement switch to see if this will resolve the issue - but the fact that it happened all at the same time concerns me that it could be electrical or wiring. All the wires under the dash are intact.
- NHTSA ID
- 11688025
- Incident
- Aug 20, 2025
The contact owns a 2005 Toyota Highlander. The contact stated that while the vehicle was on a lift at the independent mechanic, it was discovered that the rear subframe was rusted. The contact was informed that the subframe needed to be replaced. No warning lights were illuminated. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 150,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11679953
- Incident
- Apr 11, 2003
- Mileage
- 150,000 mi
Passager seat burnt up from the heated seats
- NHTSA ID
- 11632074
- Incident
- Dec 23, 2024
The contact owned a 2005 Toyota Highlander. The contact stated that while driving 15 MPH, the brake pedal was depressed and the vehicle accelerated and crashed into a fence. The air bags did not deploy. At the time of the crash, the vehicle was 20 MPH. The vehicle was towed to a junkyard. No warning lights were illuminated. The contact sustained a face injury where he lost several teeth and also had back pain. Medical treatment was needed for the injury, went to the hospital and got an x-ray and some dental work done A police report was filed. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired by an independent mechanic or dealer. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 108,435.
- NHTSA ID
- 11538494
- Incident
- Nov 22, 2020
- Mileage
- 108,435 mi
Driver's seat belt locked up so I was unable to wear it, I hit a deer tried to swerve to miss it, and my car was shaking uncontrollably.
- NHTSA ID
- 11442491
- Incident
- Dec 1, 2021
I was driving home and a deer ran infront of me. I tried to put my seat belt on before but it locked, so I tried to get home to my 3yr old safely without it.
- NHTSA ID
- 11442490
- Incident
- Dec 1, 2021
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
Some 2005 – 2026 Toyota vehicles that have undergone water intrusion may exhibit a condition in which a musty odor is present. Follow the procedures in this bulletin to remediate the odor and address this condition. The purpose of this Service Bulletin is to provide general guidelines and procedures for odor remediation. This Service Bulletin provides a guide on how to prepare and treat the interior of the vehicle for odor remediation. Refer to the applicable model and model year Repair Manual and the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) website for the most up-to-date safety and precautionary guidelines.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle, especially the horizontal areas such as the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage to the painted surfaces can occur. Acid rain damage can typically be identified on vehicles by the presence of stains on the paint surface that resemble hard water spots. Unlike water spots however, acid rain damage cannot be removed by regular washing procedures. Also, because acid rain can etch and soften the paint, normal buffing or polishing repair procedures should not be attempted. This can cause further damage and result in visible depressions in the paint surface. The following are the three major categories of acid rain damage: •Minor damage: requires only buffing to repair. •Moderate damage: usually requires neutralizing, color sanding, and buffing. •Severe damage: extending beyond 1/2 mil of clearcoat on a pearl, metallic, or solid color, requires neutralization, sanding, and repainting. In cases where acid rain damage is minor, neutralization and buffing with a liquid-type paint finessing product may provide an adequate repair. Only specially formulated products outlined in this bulletin should be used for that purpose. Unfortunately, other than minor damage, there is no simple method of determining the actual extent (depth) of acid penetration other than color sanding a representative affected area until there is no visible etching or depressions, followed by measuring the amount of paint removed with either a magnetic or digital-type film thickness gauge. The procedures in this bulletin are intended for use by qualified body/paint technicians and should not be attempted by inexperienced personnel. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. Perform frequent vehicle washing, as often as daily, during high heat and humidity periods to minimize the potential for paint damage due to acid rain exposure. This is especially important in geographical areas known for high frequency and concentration of acid rain and industrial fallout.
STRUCTURE:BODY
The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these contaminants settle and remain on a painted vehicle surface, especially the horizonal areas of the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage can occur. This damage is the result of actual etching of the paint and appears as pitting or water spots. As acid rain droplets on the vehicle surface evaporate, the concentration strength of the acid increases, causing deeper and more rapid damage. This evaporation and corrosive action also occur more rapidly on dark colored cars as direct sun heat increases. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. In areas known for high frequency and/or concentration of acid rain, frequent vehicle washing during high heat or humidity periods will minimize the potential for paint damage caused by acid rain. It is further recommended that either reverse osmosis or deionized water be used to prevent water spotting.
STRUCTURE:BODY
To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Toyota vehicles are currently protected with RapgardTM protective film designed to protect the horizontal painted surfaces. This material protects from acid rain, environmental fallout, and rail contamination. Follow the Removal Procedure in this bulletin to remove the RapgardTM protective film within 90 days from initial application.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Vehicles may occasionally be subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles shed from railroad tracks, train wheels, exposure to heavy machinery facilities, grinding, welding, etc. This type of contamination can be identified by the presence of small, red or brown particles on the paint surface. These particles are often difficult to see on dark color paints but can be easily felt when brushing a hand across horizontal body surfaces such as the hood, roof, or deck lid. Follow the Repair Procedure in this bulletin to clean vehicles that may have been subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles such as rail dust during rail transportation or extended storage near industrial areas.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 9 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2024 | 39 | 7 | 0 | 65.5 |
| 2023 | 172 | 9 | 0 | 60.8 |
| 2022 | 229 | 5 | 0 | 59.6 |
| 2021 | 487 | 4 | 0 | 60.2 |
| 2020 | 304 | 4 | 0 | 60.6 |
| 2019 | 471 | 3 | 0 | 60.7 |
| 2018 | 258 | 5 | 0 | 61.7 |
| 2017 | 261 | 4 | 0 | 61.2 |
| 2016 | 109 | 3 | 0 | 56.6 |
| 2015 | 189 | 2 | 0 | 55.2 |
| 2014 | 134 | 5 | 0 | 52.1 |
| 2013 | 205 | 3 | 2 | 60.5 |
| 2012 | 181 | 2 | 2 | 57.3 |
| 2011 | 181 | 5 | 2 | 58.5 |
| 2010 | 216 | 10 | 2 | 60.9 |
| 2009 | 134 | 9 | 2 | 58.0 |
| 2008 | 403 | 13 | 2 | 63.7 |
| 2007 | 123 | 4 | 0 | 51.3 |
| 2006 | 275 | 7 | 2 | 63.4 |
| 2005Viewing | 224 | 6 | 1 | 61.7 |
| 2004 | 286 | 5 | 1 | 58.4 |
| 2003 | 258 | 2 | 0 | 50.7 |
| 2002 | 301 | 2 | 0 | 51.2 |
| 2001 | 137 | 3 | 0 | 53.4 |
| 2000 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 1999 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 1998 | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 1997 | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.