TIRES:TEMPORARY/EMERGENCY SPARE TIRE
2002 Toyota Tacoma
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 333 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2002 Toyota Tacoma, most frequently naming the body & structure, suspension and other / unspecified categories. 5 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 135 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2016 | 1 | 229 |
| May 2016 | 1 | 230 |
| Jun 2016 | 4 | 234 |
| Aug 2016 | 4 | 238 |
| Sep 2016 | 1 | 239 |
| Oct 2016 | 2 | 241 |
| Nov 2016 | 6 | 247 |
| Jan 2017 | 5 | 252 |
| Mar 2017 | 1 | 253 |
| Apr 2017 | 4 | 257 |
| May 2017 | 1 | 258 |
| Jun 2017 | 3 | 261 |
| Aug 2017 | 4 | 265 |
| Sep 2017 | 2 | 267 |
| Oct 2017 | 1 | 268 |
| Nov 2017 | 1 | 269 |
| Dec 2017 | 1 | 270 |
| Jan 2018 | 2 | 272 |
| Mar 2018 | 1 | 273 |
| Apr 2018 | 1 | 274 |
| May 2018 | 3 | 277 |
| Jun 2018 | 2 | 279 |
| Jul 2018 | 3 | 282 |
| Aug 2018 | 1 | 283 |
| Sep 2018 | 1 | 284 |
| Oct 2018 | 2 | 286 |
| Nov 2018 | 3 | 289 |
| Dec 2018 | 2 | 291 |
| Mar 2019 | 1 | 292 |
| Apr 2019 | 1 | 293 |
| May 2019 | 2 | 295 |
| Jun 2019 | 2 | 297 |
| Jul 2019 | 2 | 299 |
| Aug 2019 | 2 | 301 |
| Sep 2019 | 2 | 303 |
| Nov 2019 | 1 | 304 |
| Mar 2020 | 1 | 305 |
| May 2020 | 1 | 306 |
| Sep 2020 | 2 | 308 |
| Oct 2020 | 1 | 309 |
| Nov 2020 | 2 | 311 |
| Dec 2020 | 1 | 312 |
| Jan 2021 | 2 | 314 |
| Jun 2021 | 2 | 316 |
| Jul 2021 | 1 | 317 |
| Sep 2021 | 1 | 318 |
| Dec 2021 | 1 | 319 |
| Apr 2022 | 1 | 320 |
| Sep 2022 | 1 | 321 |
| Dec 2022 | 1 | 322 |
| Feb 2023 | 1 | 323 |
| Aug 2023 | 1 | 324 |
| Sep 2023 | 1 | 325 |
| Mar 2024 | 1 | 326 |
| Apr 2024 | 1 | 327 |
| May 2024 | 1 | 328 |
| Jul 2024 | 2 | 330 |
| Sep 2024 | 1 | 331 |
| Oct 2024 | 1 | 332 |
| May 2025 | 1 | 333 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Body & structure18044.9%
- Suspension8220.4%
- Other / unspecified194.7%
- Airbags194.7%
- Brakes174.2%
- Tires & wheels153.7%
- Transmission133.2%
- Steering92.2%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
5 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govEXTERIOR LIGHTING
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
Rackandpinon replacement was also the upper and lower ball joints my steering is still giving me problems and I feel like it’s asafty concern because if I’m going down the highway I could loose control I have some receipts for what my mechanic replaced I called Toyota and they told me that it was to late to fix anything and that I would have to deal with it I never received a notice in the mail or anywhere else I feel like Toyota owes me Also what has happened is my spare tire feel off from the hanger going up my driveway I got to looking and the cable rusted away along with my rear parking brake cable up under the truck thanks for your time
- NHTSA ID
- 11661021
- Incident
- Jul 5, 2022
Found hole in frame (chassis)
- NHTSA ID
- 11620763
- Incident
- Oct 4, 2024
I recently lost both front wheels in two different incidents within a month. Early August drivers side ball joint failed on me. And on September 25th the passenger side failed on me on the freeway almost causing a collision with a mercedes and a semi truck.
- NHTSA ID
- 11616743
- Incident
- Sep 25, 2024
As I was pulling out from being parked the truck just dropped to the floor on the drivers side. When I got out to see what happened? My wheel broke off at the lower ball joint yesterday evening. I had to wait 2 hours for a tow. I had no warning or symptoms prior.
- NHTSA ID
- 11604407
- Incident
- Jul 23, 2024
The contact owns a 2002 Toyota Tacoma. The contact stated that while driving approximately 50 MPH, the front passenger’s side wheel separated from the vehicle, causing the driver to lose control of the steering and drove into the opposite lane. The vehicle was later towed to the local dealer who diagnosed that the front suspension ball joint had failed and needed to be replaced. The contact was also informed that the front shocks, front tires, and front brakes were also damaged during the failure, and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not yet repaired. The manufacturer was not contacted. The failure mileage was 443,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11598221
- Incident
- May 15, 2024
- Mileage
- 443,000 mi
My air conditioning is not working right blowing hot air. Had it charged and no change, I believe that I have the same issue as others, My air bags light keeps going off and on when driving. I see where there was a recall on other Toyota vehicles that had the same problem as me.
- NHTSA ID
- 11588939
- Incident
- May 7, 2024
We heard they issued a recall for faulty frames. When someone told us this we contacted Toyota. They said it had expired. I never received a recall of any kind.i take excellent care of my vehicles and this Tacoma only roughly 98,000 miles. The body is great shape, it runs great. My question is if the frame should break and we're going 65mph, who is responsible if someone is killed. We did not know about the recall and we certainly would have had them fix it. Is there any way you can help us resolve this issue with Toyota? Thank you in advance.
- NHTSA ID
- 11581905
- Incident
- Apr 8, 2024
The contact owns a 2002 Toyota Tacoma. The contact stated while an independent mechanic was servicing the vehicle, the contact was informed that the rear sub frame was severely rusted at the spring shackle on the driver's side. The vehicle was then taken to an auto body shop, where it was determined that the sub frame needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The dealer was notified of the failure. The manufacturer was notified of the failure, but no assistance was provided. The failure mileage was approximately 225,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11575856
- Incident
- Feb 21, 2024
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
STRUCTURE:BODY
To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.
STRUCTURE:BODY
The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these contaminants settle and remain on a painted vehicle surface, especially the horizonal areas of the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage can occur. This damage is the result of actual etching of the paint and appears as pitting or water spots. As acid rain droplets on the vehicle surface evaporate, the concentration strength of the acid increases, causing deeper and more rapid damage. This evaporation and corrosive action also occur more rapidly on dark colored cars as direct sun heat increases. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. In areas known for high frequency and/or concentration of acid rain, frequent vehicle washing during high heat or humidity periods will minimize the potential for paint damage caused by acid rain. It is further recommended that either reverse osmosis or deionized water be used to prevent water spotting.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle, especially the horizontal areas such as the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage to the painted surfaces can occur. Acid rain damage can typically be identified on vehicles by the presence of stains on the paint surface that resemble hard water spots. Unlike water spots however, acid rain damage cannot be removed by regular washing procedures. Also, because acid rain can etch and soften the paint, normal buffing or polishing repair procedures should not be attempted. This can cause further damage and result in visible depressions in the paint surface. The following are the three major categories of acid rain damage: •Minor damage: requires only buffing to repair. •Moderate damage: usually requires neutralizing, color sanding, and buffing. •Severe damage: extending beyond 1/2 mil of clearcoat on a pearl, metallic, or solid color, requires neutralization, sanding, and repainting. In cases where acid rain damage is minor, neutralization and buffing with a liquid-type paint finessing product may provide an adequate repair. Only specially formulated products outlined in this bulletin should be used for that purpose. Unfortunately, other than minor damage, there is no simple method of determining the actual extent (depth) of acid penetration other than color sanding a representative affected area until there is no visible etching or depressions, followed by measuring the amount of paint removed with either a magnetic or digital-type film thickness gauge. The procedures in this bulletin are intended for use by qualified body/paint technicians and should not be attempted by inexperienced personnel. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. Perform frequent vehicle washing, as often as daily, during high heat and humidity periods to minimize the potential for paint damage due to acid rain exposure. This is especially important in geographical areas known for high frequency and concentration of acid rain and industrial fallout.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Toyota vehicles are currently protected with RapgardTM protective film designed to protect the horizontal painted surfaces. This material protects from acid rain, environmental fallout, and rail contamination. Follow the Removal Procedure in this bulletin to remove the RapgardTM protective film within 90 days from initial application.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Vehicles may occasionally be subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles shed from railroad tracks, train wheels, exposure to heavy machinery facilities, grinding, welding, etc. This type of contamination can be identified by the presence of small, red or brown particles on the paint surface. These particles are often difficult to see on dark color paints but can be easily felt when brushing a hand across horizontal body surfaces such as the hood, roof, or deck lid. Follow the Repair Procedure in this bulletin to clean vehicles that may have been subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles such as rail dust during rail transportation or extended storage near industrial areas.
STRUCTURE:BODY
To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 79 | 4 | 0 | 60.5 |
| 2024 | 142 | 4 | 0 | 54.2 |
| 2023 | 51 | 4 | 0 | 60.7 |
| 2022 | 57 | 3 | 0 | 60.2 |
| 2021 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 49.5 |
| 2020 | 86 | 1 | 0 | 47.4 |
| 2019 | 212 | 4 | 1 | 56.4 |
| 2018 | 202 | 3 | 1 | 56.9 |
| 2017 | 237 | 5 | 1 | 60.6 |
| 2016 | 323 | 4 | 1 | 53.8 |
| 2015 | 100 | 4 | 1 | 65.0 |
| 2014 | 93 | 4 | 1 | 60.9 |
| 2013 | 124 | 6 | 1 | 64.8 |
| 2012 | 294 | 7 | 1 | 54.9 |
| 2011 | 184 | 9 | 0 | 55.9 |
| 2010 | 291 | 13 | 0 | 54.1 |
| 2009 | 518 | 13 | 0 | 54.2 |
| 2008 | 445 | 11 | 0 | 57.7 |
| 2007 | 540 | 10 | 1 | 61.5 |
| 2006 | 782 | 11 | 1 | 58.7 |
| 2005 | 707 | 10 | 0 | 52.5 |
| 2004 | 414 | 5 | 0 | 52.9 |
| 2003 | 359 | 5 | 0 | 54.2 |
| 2002Viewing | 333 | 5 | 0 | 52.6 |
| 2001 | 396 | 6 | 0 | 56.3 |
| 2000 | 210 | 5 | 0 | 57.4 |
| 1999 | 249 | 5 | 0 | 56.6 |
| 1998 | 300 | 5 | 0 | 56.2 |
| 1997 | 131 | 4 | 0 | 54.4 |
| 1996 | 253 | 6 | 1 | 56.5 |
| 1995 | 177 | 6 | 1 | 61.0 |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.