SUSPENSION:REAR:SPRINGS:LEAF SPRING ASSEMBLY:LEAF
2005 Toyota Tacoma
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 707 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2005 Toyota Tacoma, most frequently naming the body & structure, suspension and driver assistance categories. 10 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 337 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 2017 | 5 | 600 |
| Apr 2017 | 6 | 606 |
| May 2017 | 7 | 613 |
| Jun 2017 | 2 | 615 |
| Jul 2017 | 5 | 620 |
| Aug 2017 | 2 | 622 |
| Sep 2017 | 1 | 623 |
| Nov 2017 | 1 | 624 |
| Dec 2017 | 3 | 627 |
| Jan 2018 | 2 | 629 |
| Mar 2018 | 7 | 636 |
| Apr 2018 | 2 | 638 |
| May 2018 | 1 | 639 |
| Jun 2018 | 2 | 641 |
| Oct 2018 | 1 | 642 |
| Nov 2018 | 1 | 643 |
| Dec 2018 | 1 | 644 |
| Mar 2019 | 2 | 646 |
| Apr 2019 | 3 | 649 |
| May 2019 | 4 | 653 |
| Jul 2019 | 1 | 654 |
| Aug 2019 | 1 | 655 |
| Sep 2019 | 2 | 657 |
| Oct 2019 | 1 | 658 |
| Nov 2019 | 1 | 659 |
| Dec 2019 | 1 | 660 |
| Feb 2020 | 3 | 663 |
| Mar 2020 | 2 | 665 |
| Apr 2020 | 1 | 666 |
| May 2020 | 1 | 667 |
| Jun 2020 | 2 | 669 |
| Jul 2020 | 2 | 671 |
| Aug 2020 | 2 | 673 |
| Sep 2020 | 1 | 674 |
| Nov 2020 | 2 | 676 |
| Dec 2020 | 1 | 677 |
| Apr 2021 | 3 | 680 |
| Jun 2021 | 1 | 681 |
| Jul 2021 | 2 | 683 |
| Oct 2021 | 1 | 684 |
| Nov 2021 | 2 | 686 |
| Jan 2022 | 1 | 687 |
| Feb 2022 | 1 | 688 |
| Mar 2022 | 1 | 689 |
| Jul 2022 | 1 | 690 |
| Aug 2022 | 1 | 691 |
| Sep 2022 | 1 | 692 |
| Oct 2022 | 1 | 693 |
| Feb 2023 | 2 | 695 |
| Jun 2023 | 1 | 696 |
| Jul 2023 | 1 | 697 |
| Sep 2023 | 1 | 698 |
| Oct 2023 | 1 | 699 |
| Dec 2023 | 1 | 700 |
| Feb 2024 | 1 | 701 |
| May 2024 | 1 | 702 |
| Sep 2024 | 2 | 704 |
| Aug 2025 | 1 | 705 |
| Sep 2025 | 1 | 706 |
| Jun 2026 | 1 | 707 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Body & structure26031.7%
- Suspension13716.7%
- Driver assistance9511.6%
- Steering617.4%
- Airbags465.6%
- Engine323.9%
- Transmission313.8%
- Tires & wheels273.3%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
10 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSEAT BELTS
AIR BAGS:FRONTAL
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
I discovered frame perforation rust, for which Toyota sent letters offering to repair or compensate. I have moved to Florida and the letters didn't forward. So I notified Toyota and they said they would not do anything to help. There was a prior class-action lawsuit about this, which prompted Toyota's action. I have sent Toyota mechanic statements and photos of the rust along with m y nice letter requesting help. They offered that I could get my vehicle inspected at a Toyota dealer, at my expense, which would auto-enter it into their warranty database, repair order # [XXX] which I did this week. I am writing them back again, appealing for their help. In the interim, I am making this report. I will also be notifying the Florida Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11744962
- Incident
- Sep 2, 2024
The frame had rust a lot,had one spot was repaired,still have some need fix
- NHTSA ID
- 11686155
- Incident
- Sep 9, 2025
Odometer Fraud. The contact purchased a 2005 Toyota Tacoma. The contact discovered a mileage discrepancy after the purchase. The vehicle was a private sale through OfferUp. At the time of purchase, the vehicle mileage was 139,900. It was later discovered that the mileage on the Title was 339,740.
- NHTSA ID
- 11682911
- Incident
- Aug 22, 2025
- Mileage
- 339,740 mi
Corrocion en el chasis, el motor se encuentra inclinado
- NHTSA ID
- 11613313
- Incident
- Sep 8, 2024
The frame is rusting out substantially. The dealer advised me not to drive because the frame could fail at anytime. I have been driving around unaware of the problem. I could have been killed if the framed failed on the highway. There was no warning light. The Vehicle has been into the dealer and no one mentioned the problem until 08/30/2024. The Vehicle has been maintained and garaged. The vehicle is in good condition and has not been in an accident. I called Toyota and was told I was out of luck because the warranty expired even though the frame problem was Toyotas fault. A truck frame should outlast the engine and the body. I plan to keep the truck for 400,00 miles and my finances are very tight. Toyota is penalizing me because the frame didn't rust out sooner and on Toyotas time frame.
- NHTSA ID
- 11612615
- Incident
- Aug 30, 2024
The frame has failed and is well beyond unsafe for the road due to the amount of rust and decay. The vehicle was part of the 'Corrosion Resistance Compound Application to Vehicle Frame' recall. I will bring the vehicle for inspection ASAP, if requested. There is absolutely nothing safe when a vehicle has a faulty structural issue. When I purchased the vehicle there were step rails and spray painted portions of the frame, the parts you could see. Also, when looking up the vehicle, I didn't see any recall issues at that time and thought it was a good sign. After driving it for 6th months, I started feeling a slight resistance feel when accelerating and turning at the same time. I took it to a mechanic and they delivered the news that the frame was deemed unfit for the roads. I found out that the vehicle was brought in for the recall when it came out and at that time the frame was labeled 'not exchangeable' and a slight bandage was applied to the unsafe defective body component that was sold as 'safe.' I filed a claim with a local dealership and they told me that it was still safe for roads. Right now, the frame clips and portions of the frame are visibly rusting off, visible from solely walking up to the truck. Reaching out to Toyota I am very much hoping that the care for their loyal customers equally matches the product that they produce, superior to the competition. I have owned a Toyota for 10 years and never considered purchasing anything else for life, however, coming to a fair solution on this issue will have a tremendous effect on that statement I know to be true, right now. This truck is in OUTSTANDING condition with VERY little rust to the actually black body of the vehicle and had ONLY 165,000 miles on it. Please don't allow this vehicle to be absent for the roads due to an issue that was already agreed that it needed correcting. Please allow myself to continue to feel that Toyota makes an outstanding product because they care about the customer.
- NHTSA ID
- 11591663
- Incident
- May 30, 2024
The contact owns a 2005 Toyota Tacoma. After a visual inspection of the exterior of the vehicle, the contact observed extreme corrosion on the sub frame. There was no warning light illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, who confirmed the corrosion of the sub frame and deemed the vehicle unsafe for driving. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure but provided no assistance. The failure mileage was 130,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11572427
- Incident
- Feb 16, 2024
- Mileage
- 130,000 mi
Frame failure due to rust. Suspension is detached with springs hitting frame. NOTE: fuel tank partially detached previously due to rusted brackets 3-4 years ago and all components were replaced. Filed NHTSA report at that time however had technical issues completing… Still have photos.
- NHTSA ID
- 11559705
- Incident
- Dec 7, 2023
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
Some 2005 – 2026 Toyota vehicles that have undergone water intrusion may exhibit a condition in which a musty odor is present. Follow the procedures in this bulletin to remediate the odor and address this condition. The purpose of this Service Bulletin is to provide general guidelines and procedures for odor remediation. This Service Bulletin provides a guide on how to prepare and treat the interior of the vehicle for odor remediation. Refer to the applicable model and model year Repair Manual and the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) website for the most up-to-date safety and precautionary guidelines.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle, especially the horizontal areas such as the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage to the painted surfaces can occur. Acid rain damage can typically be identified on vehicles by the presence of stains on the paint surface that resemble hard water spots. Unlike water spots however, acid rain damage cannot be removed by regular washing procedures. Also, because acid rain can etch and soften the paint, normal buffing or polishing repair procedures should not be attempted. This can cause further damage and result in visible depressions in the paint surface. The following are the three major categories of acid rain damage: •Minor damage: requires only buffing to repair. •Moderate damage: usually requires neutralizing, color sanding, and buffing. •Severe damage: extending beyond 1/2 mil of clearcoat on a pearl, metallic, or solid color, requires neutralization, sanding, and repainting. In cases where acid rain damage is minor, neutralization and buffing with a liquid-type paint finessing product may provide an adequate repair. Only specially formulated products outlined in this bulletin should be used for that purpose. Unfortunately, other than minor damage, there is no simple method of determining the actual extent (depth) of acid penetration other than color sanding a representative affected area until there is no visible etching or depressions, followed by measuring the amount of paint removed with either a magnetic or digital-type film thickness gauge. The procedures in this bulletin are intended for use by qualified body/paint technicians and should not be attempted by inexperienced personnel. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. Perform frequent vehicle washing, as often as daily, during high heat and humidity periods to minimize the potential for paint damage due to acid rain exposure. This is especially important in geographical areas known for high frequency and concentration of acid rain and industrial fallout.
STRUCTURE:BODY
The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these contaminants settle and remain on a painted vehicle surface, especially the horizonal areas of the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage can occur. This damage is the result of actual etching of the paint and appears as pitting or water spots. As acid rain droplets on the vehicle surface evaporate, the concentration strength of the acid increases, causing deeper and more rapid damage. This evaporation and corrosive action also occur more rapidly on dark colored cars as direct sun heat increases. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. In areas known for high frequency and/or concentration of acid rain, frequent vehicle washing during high heat or humidity periods will minimize the potential for paint damage caused by acid rain. It is further recommended that either reverse osmosis or deionized water be used to prevent water spotting.
STRUCTURE:BODY
To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Toyota vehicles are currently protected with RapgardTM protective film designed to protect the horizontal painted surfaces. This material protects from acid rain, environmental fallout, and rail contamination. Follow the Removal Procedure in this bulletin to remove the RapgardTM protective film within 90 days from initial application.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Vehicles may occasionally be subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles shed from railroad tracks, train wheels, exposure to heavy machinery facilities, grinding, welding, etc. This type of contamination can be identified by the presence of small, red or brown particles on the paint surface. These particles are often difficult to see on dark color paints but can be easily felt when brushing a hand across horizontal body surfaces such as the hood, roof, or deck lid. Follow the Repair Procedure in this bulletin to clean vehicles that may have been subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles such as rail dust during rail transportation or extended storage near industrial areas.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 79 | 4 | 0 | 60.5 |
| 2024 | 142 | 4 | 0 | 54.2 |
| 2023 | 51 | 4 | 0 | 60.7 |
| 2022 | 57 | 3 | 0 | 60.2 |
| 2021 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 49.5 |
| 2020 | 86 | 1 | 0 | 47.4 |
| 2019 | 212 | 4 | 1 | 56.4 |
| 2018 | 202 | 3 | 1 | 56.9 |
| 2017 | 237 | 5 | 1 | 60.6 |
| 2016 | 323 | 4 | 1 | 53.8 |
| 2015 | 100 | 4 | 1 | 65.0 |
| 2014 | 93 | 4 | 1 | 60.9 |
| 2013 | 124 | 6 | 1 | 64.8 |
| 2012 | 294 | 7 | 1 | 54.9 |
| 2011 | 184 | 9 | 0 | 55.9 |
| 2010 | 291 | 13 | 0 | 54.1 |
| 2009 | 518 | 13 | 0 | 54.2 |
| 2008 | 445 | 11 | 0 | 57.7 |
| 2007 | 540 | 10 | 1 | 61.5 |
| 2006 | 782 | 11 | 1 | 58.7 |
| 2005Viewing | 707 | 10 | 0 | 52.5 |
| 2004 | 414 | 5 | 0 | 52.9 |
| 2003 | 359 | 5 | 0 | 54.2 |
| 2002 | 333 | 5 | 0 | 52.6 |
| 2001 | 396 | 6 | 0 | 56.3 |
| 2000 | 210 | 5 | 0 | 57.4 |
| 1999 | 249 | 5 | 0 | 56.6 |
| 1998 | 300 | 5 | 0 | 56.2 |
| 1997 | 131 | 4 | 0 | 54.4 |
| 1996 | 253 | 6 | 1 | 56.5 |
| 1995 | 177 | 6 | 1 | 61.0 |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.