TIRES:TEMPORARY/EMERGENCY SPARE TIRE
2003 Toyota Tacoma
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 359 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2003 Toyota Tacoma, most frequently naming the body & structure, suspension and driver assistance categories. 5 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 139 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2017 | 5 | 263 |
| May 2017 | 4 | 267 |
| Jun 2017 | 1 | 268 |
| Jul 2017 | 1 | 269 |
| Aug 2017 | 2 | 271 |
| Sep 2017 | 2 | 273 |
| Oct 2017 | 1 | 274 |
| Nov 2017 | 1 | 275 |
| Dec 2017 | 1 | 276 |
| Jan 2018 | 1 | 277 |
| Feb 2018 | 2 | 279 |
| Mar 2018 | 1 | 280 |
| May 2018 | 2 | 282 |
| Jul 2018 | 2 | 284 |
| Aug 2018 | 2 | 286 |
| Sep 2018 | 2 | 288 |
| Oct 2018 | 3 | 291 |
| Nov 2018 | 2 | 293 |
| Dec 2018 | 3 | 296 |
| Jan 2019 | 1 | 297 |
| Feb 2019 | 2 | 299 |
| Mar 2019 | 1 | 300 |
| Apr 2019 | 2 | 302 |
| May 2019 | 7 | 309 |
| Jul 2019 | 4 | 313 |
| Aug 2019 | 2 | 315 |
| Sep 2019 | 2 | 317 |
| Oct 2019 | 1 | 318 |
| Nov 2019 | 1 | 319 |
| Jan 2020 | 1 | 320 |
| Jun 2020 | 3 | 323 |
| Jul 2020 | 1 | 324 |
| Aug 2020 | 1 | 325 |
| Sep 2020 | 1 | 326 |
| Oct 2020 | 2 | 328 |
| Jan 2021 | 1 | 329 |
| Feb 2021 | 2 | 331 |
| Mar 2021 | 2 | 333 |
| Apr 2021 | 2 | 335 |
| Jun 2021 | 2 | 337 |
| Dec 2021 | 1 | 338 |
| Jun 2022 | 1 | 339 |
| Jul 2022 | 1 | 340 |
| Aug 2022 | 1 | 341 |
| Nov 2022 | 1 | 342 |
| May 2023 | 2 | 344 |
| Jul 2023 | 1 | 345 |
| Aug 2023 | 1 | 346 |
| Sep 2023 | 1 | 347 |
| Nov 2023 | 1 | 348 |
| Feb 2024 | 1 | 349 |
| Jun 2024 | 2 | 351 |
| Oct 2024 | 1 | 352 |
| Nov 2024 | 1 | 353 |
| Feb 2025 | 1 | 354 |
| May 2025 | 1 | 355 |
| Sep 2025 | 1 | 356 |
| Nov 2025 | 1 | 357 |
| Jan 2026 | 1 | 358 |
| Feb 2026 | 1 | 359 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Body & structure18140.9%
- Suspension6614.9%
- Driver assistance276.1%
- Airbags276.1%
- Fuel system225.0%
- Tires & wheels214.7%
- Brakes194.3%
- Engine194.3%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
5 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govEXTERIOR LIGHTING
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
I took my 2003 Toyota Tacoma and for a tire alignment and was told by an employee of the tire shop that my rack and pinion needed to be replaced and lower ball joints. I checked the VIN number and it said I have zero recalls, but there is a general recall on this make a model that I have what do I do? I also have the steering has a lot of play whenever I go for a bump in the road like the tires catch the road so I kind of swerve a little bit and I feel that it’s very unsafe to me and other drivers.
- NHTSA ID
- 11719764
- Incident
- Feb 21, 2026
Invoice no. XXX Frame recall. I have a receipt stating…”J# 20TOZFRAM,;CS FRAM Inspection TECY(S):351 Warrenty inspected Frame, Frame failed, perforation, Replaced Frame at Dealer”. Except they did not replace the frame, I have a receipt stating they replaced the “ spare tire rack assembly. Now, my frame is so rusted it will not pass inspection next September. It has been welded already, at the tune of $2500.00. This truck has 122,000 miles. I want the truck fixed. I’ve been in touch with the BBB and the attorney general, and others. The attorney general suggested I get a lawyer. This is a a gross deception from the Orleans Dealer in [XXX] . INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11708851
- Incident
- Jun 1, 2010
While driving at both high speeds (highway) and local road speed limits, Toyota Tacoma's rear passenger side frame split completely in half. While performing maneuvers such as right turns, vehicle wobbled and I, driver, lost temporary control of vehicle. Upon further inspection, rear driver side frame also contains stress fractures which are symmetric to the rear passenger side of truck. Potential for accident has increased exponentially. Pictures provided. Brought evidence of clear safety hazard to local Metro Detroit dealership at 773 S Rochester Rd Unit B, Rochester Hills, MI 48307 on 04NOV25, and called Toyota Corporate on 05NOV25. Toyota Corporate neglected my concerns about safety hazard and potential harm to myself and family. Safety recall needs to be issued immediately. This issue stems from a well known recall from Toyota of Toyota Tacoma's, 1996-2004, which contained an OEM defect of excessive corrasion to the frames, causing premature failure of the frames due to excessive rust build up which impacts frame integrity and increases probability of failures such as observed in my case.
- NHTSA ID
- 11697609
- Incident
- Nov 3, 2025
Prior to July, 2010, I received a letter from Toyota stating my Tacoma Frame was recalled. I wouldn’t have known otherwise. I set up an appointment with the Orleans Toyota dealer and set up an appointment. They gave me a loaner and had my truck for two weeks. I thought my frame had been replaced. All this time went by and now my frame is dangerously rusted. Last year I spent $2500 getting it spot welded. This year the mechanic says he may not be able to pass it next time. This provoked me to research all my bills for the truck. What I found was unbelievable to me. I never looked at my billing receipt from Orleans Toyota, but believed the frame was done. Not the case. They replaced the 83341 Spare Tire Carrier 5092 Wpt. Part=04002-11204. My Tacoma has 122,000 on it now. I’m [XXX]. I cannot afford a new car payment . From what I understand there are 100s of people with the same problem of seriously rusted frames. I need your help. Thank youL [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11686339
- Incident
- Jun 18, 2010
What component or system failed or malfunctioned, and is it available for inspection upon request? While driving over railroad tracks, the lower ball joint separated from its socket, which caused the CV axle shaft to break apart and led to the separation of the upper ball joint. As a result, the front driver's side tire folded under the fender, causing the truck to abruptly veer off the road and into the right shoulder All parts are available for inspection How was your safety or the safety of others put at risk? When the failure occurred, I was driving over a series of railroad tracks when the truck suddenly veered off the road onto the shoulder. This abrupt veering and stopping put my safety—and the safety of others—at risk, as the drivers behind me had to react suddenly to avoid a collision. Has the problem been reproduced or confirmed by a dealer or independent service center? The truck was serviced in 2006 in response to the recall, having the lower ball joints replaced, however the replacement parts may have failed Has the vehicle or component been inspected by the manufacturer, police, insurance representatives or others? No Were there any warning lamps, messages or other symptoms of the problem prior to the failure, and when did they first appear? No
- NHTSA ID
- 11659677
- Incident
- May 6, 2025
The contact owns a 2003 Toyota Tacoma. The contact stated that while the vehicle was parked, the contact noticed that the rear subframe of the vehicle was corroded and the subframe had detached from the vehicle. The vehicle was towed to the residence. The dealer was contacted; however, the vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 260,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11644198
- Incident
- Feb 21, 2025
- Mileage
- 260,000 mi
The contact owns a 2003 Toyota Tacoma. The contact stated that while the vehicle was parked, the contact became aware that the rear sub frame on the driver's and passenger's side were corroded. The dealer was contacted. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and referred the contact to the NHSTA Hotline for assistance. The approximate failure mileage was 345,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11623181
- Incident
- Nov 1, 2024
- Mileage
- 345,000 mi
The frame rusted through and there are holes in the frame The frame broke while my wife was driving home from work. Had to get it towed to the house No No No, no symptoms
- NHTSA ID
- 11621638
- Incident
- Oct 12, 2024
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
STRUCTURE:BODY
To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.
STRUCTURE:BODY
The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these contaminants settle and remain on a painted vehicle surface, especially the horizonal areas of the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage can occur. This damage is the result of actual etching of the paint and appears as pitting or water spots. As acid rain droplets on the vehicle surface evaporate, the concentration strength of the acid increases, causing deeper and more rapid damage. This evaporation and corrosive action also occur more rapidly on dark colored cars as direct sun heat increases. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. In areas known for high frequency and/or concentration of acid rain, frequent vehicle washing during high heat or humidity periods will minimize the potential for paint damage caused by acid rain. It is further recommended that either reverse osmosis or deionized water be used to prevent water spotting.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle, especially the horizontal areas such as the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage to the painted surfaces can occur. Acid rain damage can typically be identified on vehicles by the presence of stains on the paint surface that resemble hard water spots. Unlike water spots however, acid rain damage cannot be removed by regular washing procedures. Also, because acid rain can etch and soften the paint, normal buffing or polishing repair procedures should not be attempted. This can cause further damage and result in visible depressions in the paint surface. The following are the three major categories of acid rain damage: •Minor damage: requires only buffing to repair. •Moderate damage: usually requires neutralizing, color sanding, and buffing. •Severe damage: extending beyond 1/2 mil of clearcoat on a pearl, metallic, or solid color, requires neutralization, sanding, and repainting. In cases where acid rain damage is minor, neutralization and buffing with a liquid-type paint finessing product may provide an adequate repair. Only specially formulated products outlined in this bulletin should be used for that purpose. Unfortunately, other than minor damage, there is no simple method of determining the actual extent (depth) of acid penetration other than color sanding a representative affected area until there is no visible etching or depressions, followed by measuring the amount of paint removed with either a magnetic or digital-type film thickness gauge. The procedures in this bulletin are intended for use by qualified body/paint technicians and should not be attempted by inexperienced personnel. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. Perform frequent vehicle washing, as often as daily, during high heat and humidity periods to minimize the potential for paint damage due to acid rain exposure. This is especially important in geographical areas known for high frequency and concentration of acid rain and industrial fallout.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Toyota vehicles are currently protected with RapgardTM protective film designed to protect the horizontal painted surfaces. This material protects from acid rain, environmental fallout, and rail contamination. Follow the Removal Procedure in this bulletin to remove the RapgardTM protective film within 90 days from initial application.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Vehicles may occasionally be subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles shed from railroad tracks, train wheels, exposure to heavy machinery facilities, grinding, welding, etc. This type of contamination can be identified by the presence of small, red or brown particles on the paint surface. These particles are often difficult to see on dark color paints but can be easily felt when brushing a hand across horizontal body surfaces such as the hood, roof, or deck lid. Follow the Repair Procedure in this bulletin to clean vehicles that may have been subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles such as rail dust during rail transportation or extended storage near industrial areas.
STRUCTURE:BODY
To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 79 | 4 | 0 | 60.5 |
| 2024 | 142 | 4 | 0 | 54.2 |
| 2023 | 51 | 4 | 0 | 60.7 |
| 2022 | 57 | 3 | 0 | 60.2 |
| 2021 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 49.5 |
| 2020 | 86 | 1 | 0 | 47.4 |
| 2019 | 212 | 4 | 1 | 56.4 |
| 2018 | 202 | 3 | 1 | 56.9 |
| 2017 | 237 | 5 | 1 | 60.6 |
| 2016 | 323 | 4 | 1 | 53.8 |
| 2015 | 100 | 4 | 1 | 65.0 |
| 2014 | 93 | 4 | 1 | 60.9 |
| 2013 | 124 | 6 | 1 | 64.8 |
| 2012 | 294 | 7 | 1 | 54.9 |
| 2011 | 184 | 9 | 0 | 55.9 |
| 2010 | 291 | 13 | 0 | 54.1 |
| 2009 | 518 | 13 | 0 | 54.2 |
| 2008 | 445 | 11 | 0 | 57.7 |
| 2007 | 540 | 10 | 1 | 61.5 |
| 2006 | 782 | 11 | 1 | 58.7 |
| 2005 | 707 | 10 | 0 | 52.5 |
| 2004 | 414 | 5 | 0 | 52.9 |
| 2003Viewing | 359 | 5 | 0 | 54.2 |
| 2002 | 333 | 5 | 0 | 52.6 |
| 2001 | 396 | 6 | 0 | 56.3 |
| 2000 | 210 | 5 | 0 | 57.4 |
| 1999 | 249 | 5 | 0 | 56.6 |
| 1998 | 300 | 5 | 0 | 56.2 |
| 1997 | 131 | 4 | 0 | 54.4 |
| 1996 | 253 | 6 | 1 | 56.5 |
| 1995 | 177 | 6 | 1 | 61.0 |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.