SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER
2010 Toyota Tacoma
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 294 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2010 Toyota Tacoma, most frequently naming the suspension, driver assistance and body & structure categories. 13 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 365 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| May 2017 | 1 | 206 |
| Jun 2017 | 2 | 208 |
| Jul 2017 | 3 | 211 |
| Aug 2017 | 1 | 212 |
| Nov 2017 | 1 | 213 |
| Dec 2017 | 1 | 214 |
| Jan 2018 | 1 | 215 |
| Feb 2018 | 4 | 219 |
| Mar 2018 | 2 | 221 |
| Apr 2018 | 3 | 224 |
| May 2018 | 1 | 225 |
| Jun 2018 | 1 | 226 |
| Sep 2018 | 3 | 229 |
| Oct 2018 | 1 | 230 |
| Nov 2018 | 4 | 234 |
| Jan 2019 | 2 | 236 |
| Feb 2019 | 1 | 237 |
| Aug 2019 | 2 | 239 |
| Nov 2019 | 1 | 240 |
| Dec 2019 | 1 | 241 |
| Jan 2020 | 1 | 242 |
| Feb 2020 | 1 | 243 |
| Apr 2020 | 1 | 244 |
| Jun 2020 | 1 | 245 |
| Jul 2020 | 2 | 247 |
| Sep 2020 | 2 | 249 |
| Nov 2020 | 1 | 250 |
| Apr 2021 | 2 | 252 |
| Oct 2021 | 1 | 253 |
| Nov 2021 | 1 | 254 |
| Feb 2022 | 1 | 255 |
| Jul 2022 | 1 | 256 |
| Oct 2022 | 1 | 257 |
| Dec 2022 | 2 | 259 |
| Jan 2023 | 1 | 260 |
| May 2023 | 1 | 261 |
| Sep 2023 | 3 | 264 |
| Oct 2023 | 2 | 266 |
| Dec 2023 | 2 | 268 |
| Jan 2024 | 1 | 269 |
| Mar 2024 | 1 | 270 |
| Apr 2024 | 2 | 272 |
| Aug 2024 | 1 | 273 |
| Sep 2024 | 1 | 274 |
| Oct 2024 | 1 | 275 |
| Nov 2024 | 1 | 276 |
| Dec 2024 | 1 | 277 |
| Mar 2025 | 1 | 278 |
| Apr 2025 | 1 | 279 |
| May 2025 | 2 | 281 |
| Jun 2025 | 1 | 282 |
| Jul 2025 | 1 | 283 |
| Sep 2025 | 1 | 284 |
| Oct 2025 | 1 | 285 |
| Jan 2026 | 2 | 287 |
| Feb 2026 | 1 | 288 |
| Apr 2026 | 1 | 289 |
| Jun 2026 | 1 | 290 |
| Aug 2026 | 3 | 293 |
| Sep 2026 | 1 | 294 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Suspension9529.9%
- Driver assistance3511.0%
- Body & structure309.4%
- Exterior lighting257.9%
- Brakes216.6%
- Steering196.0%
- Airbags165.0%
- Powertrain (other)165.0%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
13 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER
SUSPENSION:REAR:SPRINGS:LEAF SPRING ASSEMBLY:LEAF
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
The vehicle's structure (frame) is failing. A recall for corrosion susceptibility was disseminated for the make and model of my vehicle. A coating was applied to the frame, and I was then told by Malloy Toyota that rust will now NOT become a problem for the frame, as "it's been properly treated according to Toyota's standards following the recall." However, upon State Inspection yesterday, 9/21/26, I was told that much Rust Damage exists on the frame. The vehicle is available now for immediate inspection. My safety is immediately put at risk because I'm driving a vehicle whose structure is now compromised by the recall Toyota said they "prevented" and therefore fixed. The problem has indeed been confirmed by an independent service center. The vehicle has only been inspected by the independent service center for VA State Inspection. No warning indicating that the vehicle's frame was rusting. The issue was first brought to my attention after yesterday's VA State Inspection on 9/21/26
- NHTSA ID
- 11766074
- Incident
- Sep 21, 2026
The contact owns a 2010 Toyota Tacoma. The contact stated that while the vehicle was in for inspection, the mechanic informed the contact that the entire subframe was rusted. The contact was advised that the vehicle was unsafe to drive due to the rust on the subframe. The cause of the failure was not yet determined. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer and local dealer were contacted and informed the contact that the extended warranty for the failure had expired. No additional assistance was provided. The failure mileage was 49,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11759154
- Incident
- Aug 21, 2026
- Mileage
- 49,000 mi
Took 2010 Toyota Tacoma to independent garage for a problem with tire pressure sensor. The sensor was fixed, however employee of the garage made us aware that there was substantial rust/corrosion on the Tacoma frame. Have made 2 calls this last week to the Toyota Customer Relations/Brand Engagement specialist. Gave the representative all information that we have on the truck and talked to them about the rusted/corroded frame. They had stated that on our particular vehicle that Toyota had sent us out on 11/2017 and 11/2018 a warranty enhancement letter that had addressed this problem. We have never received either of these communications from Toyota, because if we had, we would have pursued this information with them. The main reason I know we would have pursued this, is that prior to the purchase of this truck we owned a 2000 Toyota Tacoma with a rusted frame recall and was able to have that issued resolved with Toyota. Toyota now says that the Warranty Enhancement program has expired, and there is nothing that they can do for us to resolve the rust issue. I stated to them that their records may showed that it was mailed twice to us, but we never received it, because if we had, we would have remembered it, given our prior Tacoma truck rust issue, and not just disregarded it. We have taken several pictures of the rust on the frame of the Tacoma, and never once did Toyota asked to have us forward them on to them. The pictures that we have show the degree of rust/corrosion/holes on the frame. I feel as they were not at all concerned with the safety of driving this truck and it’s declining frame safety. We were the only owner of this truck and bought it brand new in 2009. Because we feel there is definite safety issue to us, we are very disappointed with Toyota’s response.
- NHTSA ID
- 11758737
- Incident
- Aug 12, 2026
The passenger side lower A arm frame mount broke, due to frame rust. The truck has been taken to Toyota, they had the truck for about 6 weeks and have refused to fix the safety issue.This year model had a recall on the frame, it was taken in for the recall, but the recall has failed. When the lower A arm frame mount broke, I just happened to be in a parking lot. If I had been driving it, I could have killed someone, or could have been killed myself.
- NHTSA ID
- 11754384
- Incident
- Mar 4, 2026
The contact owns a 2010 Toyota Tacoma. The contact stated that while the vehicle was with an independent mechanic for a scheduled service, the contact was informed that the frame underneath the engine was rusted. The contact was advised to take the vehicle to the dealer. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, where the contact was informed that an unknown recall associated with the failure had expired. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure but provided no assistance. The failure mileage was approximately 100,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11745667
- Incident
- Jun 16, 2021
- Mileage
- 100,000 mi
2010 Toyota Tacoma with 91K miles have frame corrosion and now has holes. I contacted Toyota motor sales USA, Inc. and informed them why I NEVER received a recalled and they said it was mailed May 2019 and expired in 2022-there’s nothing they can do and if I went to the dealership for my inspections they would of known of the recall instead of going to an independent dealer. I’ve attached current photos showing the extent of corrosion over the years. Unbelievable, the recall should still be open.
- NHTSA ID
- 11729653
- Incident
- Apr 6, 2026
Our son hit a guardrail and the airbags didn't deploy. Accident and failure was reported to insurance company
- NHTSA ID
- 11719158
- Incident
- Feb 18, 2026
I am the original owner of a 2010 Toyota Tacoma TRD Sport, 4 door, 4WD, with a 6' bed, VIN # [XXX] , with 215902 miles. During the replacement of the leaf springs on 1/27/26, under recall #14V-604, I was informed by the Toyota dealership that installed the leaf springs that there was extensive corrosion on various points on the frame to the point where it was unsafe to drive. The frame has developed severe perforation and rust-through. There are large holes in the frame, and sections missing. The corrosion is spreading across multiple points, making the vehicle unsafe and at risk of structural failure while driving. I called Toyota and they said the frame recall expired in 2022. I will be asking Toyota if they will still replace the frame as a "Goodwill " replacement. I told Toyota that I was never made aware of this recall or warranty extension and never received any letter regarding it. I did receive other recall notices for this VIN but none for the frame issues. I am waiting for a response from Toyota on what action they will take, if any, to support their product. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11714253
- Incident
- Jan 27, 2026
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
Some 2005 – 2026 Toyota vehicles that have undergone water intrusion may exhibit a condition in which a musty odor is present. Follow the procedures in this bulletin to remediate the odor and address this condition. The purpose of this Service Bulletin is to provide general guidelines and procedures for odor remediation. This Service Bulletin provides a guide on how to prepare and treat the interior of the vehicle for odor remediation. Refer to the applicable model and model year Repair Manual and the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) website for the most up-to-date safety and precautionary guidelines.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle, especially the horizontal areas such as the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage to the painted surfaces can occur. Acid rain damage can typically be identified on vehicles by the presence of stains on the paint surface that resemble hard water spots. Unlike water spots however, acid rain damage cannot be removed by regular washing procedures. Also, because acid rain can etch and soften the paint, normal buffing or polishing repair procedures should not be attempted. This can cause further damage and result in visible depressions in the paint surface. The following are the three major categories of acid rain damage: •Minor damage: requires only buffing to repair. •Moderate damage: usually requires neutralizing, color sanding, and buffing. •Severe damage: extending beyond 1/2 mil of clearcoat on a pearl, metallic, or solid color, requires neutralization, sanding, and repainting. In cases where acid rain damage is minor, neutralization and buffing with a liquid-type paint finessing product may provide an adequate repair. Only specially formulated products outlined in this bulletin should be used for that purpose. Unfortunately, other than minor damage, there is no simple method of determining the actual extent (depth) of acid penetration other than color sanding a representative affected area until there is no visible etching or depressions, followed by measuring the amount of paint removed with either a magnetic or digital-type film thickness gauge. The procedures in this bulletin are intended for use by qualified body/paint technicians and should not be attempted by inexperienced personnel. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. Perform frequent vehicle washing, as often as daily, during high heat and humidity periods to minimize the potential for paint damage due to acid rain exposure. This is especially important in geographical areas known for high frequency and concentration of acid rain and industrial fallout.
STRUCTURE:BODY
The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these contaminants settle and remain on a painted vehicle surface, especially the horizonal areas of the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage can occur. This damage is the result of actual etching of the paint and appears as pitting or water spots. As acid rain droplets on the vehicle surface evaporate, the concentration strength of the acid increases, causing deeper and more rapid damage. This evaporation and corrosive action also occur more rapidly on dark colored cars as direct sun heat increases. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. In areas known for high frequency and/or concentration of acid rain, frequent vehicle washing during high heat or humidity periods will minimize the potential for paint damage caused by acid rain. It is further recommended that either reverse osmosis or deionized water be used to prevent water spotting.
STRUCTURE:BODY
To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Toyota vehicles are currently protected with RapgardTM protective film designed to protect the horizontal painted surfaces. This material protects from acid rain, environmental fallout, and rail contamination. Follow the Removal Procedure in this bulletin to remove the RapgardTM protective film within 90 days from initial application.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Vehicles may occasionally be subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles shed from railroad tracks, train wheels, exposure to heavy machinery facilities, grinding, welding, etc. This type of contamination can be identified by the presence of small, red or brown particles on the paint surface. These particles are often difficult to see on dark color paints but can be easily felt when brushing a hand across horizontal body surfaces such as the hood, roof, or deck lid. Follow the Repair Procedure in this bulletin to clean vehicles that may have been subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles such as rail dust during rail transportation or extended storage near industrial areas.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 98 | 5 | 0 | 59.7 |
| 2024 | 149 | 5 | 0 | 55.5 |
| 2023 | 54 | 4 | 0 | 60.7 |
| 2022 | 59 | 3 | 0 | 60.2 |
| 2021 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 49.2 |
| 2020 | 87 | 1 | 0 | 46.7 |
| 2019 | 218 | 4 | 1 | 57.3 |
| 2018 | 206 | 3 | 1 | 56.8 |
| 2017 | 239 | 5 | 1 | 60.2 |
| 2016 | 323 | 4 | 1 | 53.8 |
| 2015 | 101 | 4 | 1 | 65.8 |
| 2014 | 93 | 4 | 1 | 59.8 |
| 2013 | 125 | 6 | 1 | 64.7 |
| 2012 | 295 | 7 | 1 | 55.3 |
| 2011 | 186 | 9 | 0 | 56.4 |
| 2010Viewing | 294 | 13 | 0 | 54.9 |
| 2009 | 519 | 13 | 0 | 54.1 |
| 2008 | 446 | 11 | 0 | 56.7 |
| 2007 | 541 | 10 | 1 | 61.8 |
| 2006 | 782 | 11 | 1 | 58.7 |
| 2005 | 707 | 10 | 0 | 52.0 |
| 2004 | 414 | 5 | 0 | 52.5 |
| 2003 | 359 | 5 | 0 | 53.7 |
| 2002 | 333 | 5 | 0 | 52.5 |
| 2001 | 396 | 6 | 0 | 55.8 |
| 2000 | 210 | 5 | 0 | 57.4 |
| 1999 | 249 | 5 | 0 | 56.6 |
| 1998 | 300 | 5 | 0 | 56.2 |
| 1997 | 131 | 4 | 0 | 54.4 |
| 1996 | 253 | 6 | 1 | 56.5 |
| 1995 | 177 | 6 | 1 | 61.0 |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.