TIRES:TEMPORARY/EMERGENCY SPARE TIRE
2004 Toyota Tacoma
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 414 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2004 Toyota Tacoma, most frequently naming the body & structure, suspension and driver assistance categories. 5 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 143 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 2017 | 3 | 309 |
| Sep 2017 | 2 | 311 |
| Oct 2017 | 2 | 313 |
| Nov 2017 | 1 | 314 |
| Jan 2018 | 1 | 315 |
| Mar 2018 | 4 | 319 |
| Apr 2018 | 1 | 320 |
| May 2018 | 4 | 324 |
| Jun 2018 | 1 | 325 |
| Jul 2018 | 3 | 328 |
| Aug 2018 | 2 | 330 |
| Oct 2018 | 1 | 331 |
| Nov 2018 | 2 | 333 |
| Dec 2018 | 1 | 334 |
| Jan 2019 | 2 | 336 |
| Mar 2019 | 1 | 337 |
| Apr 2019 | 2 | 339 |
| May 2019 | 5 | 344 |
| Jun 2019 | 3 | 347 |
| Jul 2019 | 1 | 348 |
| Aug 2019 | 2 | 350 |
| Sep 2019 | 2 | 352 |
| Oct 2019 | 2 | 354 |
| Nov 2019 | 3 | 357 |
| Dec 2019 | 1 | 358 |
| Jan 2020 | 2 | 360 |
| Feb 2020 | 2 | 362 |
| Mar 2020 | 1 | 363 |
| Apr 2020 | 2 | 365 |
| May 2020 | 1 | 366 |
| Sep 2020 | 1 | 367 |
| Oct 2020 | 5 | 372 |
| Nov 2020 | 2 | 374 |
| Dec 2020 | 1 | 375 |
| Jan 2021 | 1 | 376 |
| Feb 2021 | 2 | 378 |
| Mar 2021 | 2 | 380 |
| Jun 2021 | 2 | 382 |
| Oct 2021 | 2 | 384 |
| Nov 2021 | 1 | 385 |
| Jan 2022 | 3 | 388 |
| Feb 2022 | 1 | 389 |
| Jun 2022 | 1 | 390 |
| Sep 2022 | 5 | 395 |
| Oct 2022 | 2 | 397 |
| Dec 2022 | 1 | 398 |
| Jan 2023 | 1 | 399 |
| Feb 2023 | 1 | 400 |
| Mar 2023 | 3 | 403 |
| Apr 2023 | 1 | 404 |
| Jun 2023 | 1 | 405 |
| Jan 2024 | 1 | 406 |
| Nov 2024 | 1 | 407 |
| Dec 2024 | 1 | 408 |
| Apr 2025 | 1 | 409 |
| Jun 2025 | 1 | 410 |
| Sep 2025 | 1 | 411 |
| Nov 2025 | 1 | 412 |
| Feb 2026 | 1 | 413 |
| Mar 2026 | 1 | 414 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Body & structure20340.4%
- Suspension8416.7%
- Driver assistance326.4%
- Steering295.8%
- Brakes244.8%
- Fuel system244.8%
- Powertrain (other)183.6%
- Electrical173.4%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
5 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govEXTERIOR LIGHTING
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
Immediately after the manufacturer recall requiring full frame replacement (completed November 2017 by the same dealership referenced below), the vehicle developed abnormal handling not present before the repair, including improper tracking and rear end instability. No warning lights/diagnostic messages were present. These issues were reported to the servicing dealership within weeks and repeatedly over the following years. Despite multiple short initial inspections and two extended service periods—totaling approximately fourteen months in the dealership’s possession—the dealership repeatedly reported no defect found and continued to advise that the vehicle was safe to operate. Due to ongoing safety concerns, an independent inspection was recently obtained. It confirmed measurable rear axle offset and a thrust angle deviation outside acceptable tolerances. The defect is visually apparent: the rear wheels are not symmetrically aligned, and the vehicle exhibits a noticeable “crab walking” effect when viewed from behind. The root cause remains undetermined and would require further diagnostic work and significant disassembly. All documentation and inspection findings are available upon request. Safety risk: The vehicle does not track correctly and shows instability, especially in low traction conditions such as rain or snow, increasing the risk of loss of control. The manufacturer has been formally notified through repeated outreach, including ongoing contact with the Brand Engagement Center since December 2025 and multiple certified letters to Toyota North America Legal/Consumer Affairs between January and March 2026. The only response received was a generic statement from the Brand Engagement Center indicating that the vehicle is out of warranty and an offer to return it to the same dealership that performed the frame replacement and failed to identify the defect. No other response, investigation, or resolution has been provided by Toyota North America.
- NHTSA ID
- 11726891
- Incident
- Nov 20, 2017
I was turning into a gas station and all the sudden the vehicle came to a complete stop i was unable to move the vehicle and sat there until the tow truck was able to show up. Looked under the vehicle and on the passenger side front suspension the lower ball joint was no longer where it belongs.
- NHTSA ID
- 11717952
- Incident
- Jan 31, 2026
My 2004 Toyota Tacoma was part of the frame replacement back in the fall of 2018 when Bobby Rahal Toyota in Mechanicsburg, PA has by truck for over 6 months while they replaced my frame. It has been determined that my rear differential is rusted and is now to the point of needing replaced. For over the last year I have tried working with Bobby Rahal to come to and understanding on having this repaired due to the fact that my mechanic believes that this rust is in fact the same issue as the frame and should have been replaced when the frame was. All they will tell me is that the recall is closed and there is nothing they can do. Very disappointed in the fact that this was handled when it should have been. Now I am stuck trying to figure out how to pay for this myself. I have taken very good care of my truck for over 21 years and there is no reason for me to have to pay out of pocket for something that they should have taken care of during the recall. I don't have a lift to check the underneath of my truck, I trust when there is a recall that the dealership will do its job and fix everything safely and not put an unsafe vehicle back on the road and wait until a vehicle rusts completely through. Bobby Rahal was also inspecting the truck at this time so they knew the rear differential was rusted. My current mechanic said the Rear differential has been rusted since the time they replaced the frame and and has been for many years. It is irresponsible for Bobby Rahal Toyota to have not replaced the Rear differential axel knowing it was rusted and unsafe.
- NHTSA ID
- 11696970
- Incident
- Nov 18, 2018
The frame broke
- NHTSA ID
- 11688089
- Incident
- Sep 1, 2025
The contact owns a 2004 Toyota Tacoma equipped with Toyo Tires, Tire Line: Open Country HT, Tire Size: 265/70/R16, DOT Number: CXLJA881918. The contact stated while driving at various speeds, the steering wheel was shuddering significantly. The vehicle was taken to Walmart for the tires to be balanced and the wheels rotated. The mechanic informed the contact that the service could not be performed because the front tires were out of round, the tires belts were separated, and the tire beads were fractured. The tires were not replaced. The tires were replacement tires. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and informed the contact that the tire warranties were not transferable from the previous owner. The vehicle failure mileage was approximately 144,549. The tires failure mileage was approximately 20,000. The VIN was not available.
- NHTSA ID
- 11667780
- Incident
- Apr 18, 2025
- Mileage
- 20,000 mi
I am writing to report a safety related issue with a 2004 Toyota Tacoma that I purchased from an auction on 12/21/2022. The vehicle has an expired recall that I believe has not been properly addressed, potentially affecting the safety of the vehicle. I have attempted to resolve this issue through Toyota's customer service and local dealership, but I have been informed that the recall is no longer active and will not be addressed. It has a Virginia rebuilt title. It failed inspection due to rust on the frame.
- NHTSA ID
- 11656088
- Incident
- Dec 21, 2022
The vehicle has an open recall (NHTSA Recall #12V542) for the spare tire carrier lift plate. I brought the vehicle to a Toyota dealership to have the recall addressed, but the dealership refused to perform the repair, stating that the frame is too rusted to proceed safely. They recommended a full frame replacement due to severe rust damage, which includes holes and significant structural weakening. Toyota has refused to provide a replacement frame under any existing recall or warranty program. This means the recall cannot be completed, and the vehicle remains unsafe to drive. Additionally, I cannot locate a replacement frame for this vehicle through Toyota or the aftermarket, leaving no practical solution to address the safety risks. The refusal to honor the recall and the lack of available replacement parts put me and others at significant risk. The problem has been confirmed by the Toyota dealership during inspection, and the rust damage makes the vehicle structurally unsound. The unresolved recall, combined with the excessive frame rust, has created a double safety hazard that needs urgent resolution
- NHTSA ID
- 11631075
- Incident
- Dec 13, 2024
Bringing to your urgent attention a significant safety concern regarding a 2004 Toyota Tacoma owned by my brother, [XXX] , bought in 2004, which has severe frame rust affecting the vehicle’s structural integrity and safety. Despite multiple attempts to resolve this matter directly with Toyota, we have been unable to obtain assistance, as Toyota states the Customer Support Notice for this issue has expired. Given the potential risk this poses to both the driver and other motorists, we are seeking your intervention to address this pressing matter. In September 2024, while retrieving an item from under the truck, my brother discovered extensive rust damage on the vehicle’s frame. We promptly took the truck to Antwerpen Toyota on September 4, 2024, where a technician confirmed the severe rust corrosion and deemed the truck unsafe to drive. The dealership informed us that Toyota had previously issued a Customer Support Notice addressing rust issues on this model but explained that the program had expired. They recommended we contact Toyota directly for potential support or compensation to help acquire a safe vehicle. We reported the case to Toyota (Case No. [XXX]) on September 4, 2024, and have since been in regular contact, yet have only been met with repeated delays and dismissals. Toyota representatives acknowledged that a notice had been issued for this problem, but despite knowing the serious nature of the rust and its impact on the vehicle’s safety, they have not provided us with any solution. We have requested escalation to senior management, but those requests have not been honored. Toyota’s refusal to address this safety defect, even with our willingness to discuss options, has left us with no alternative but to turn to your agency for help. We understand that the notice has expired and that my brother was not the vehicle’s original owner. However, this issue goes beyond a typical warranty claim, as it concerns the fundamental safety and road. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
- NHTSA ID
- 11624320
- Incident
- Sep 4, 2024
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
STRUCTURE:BODY
To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.
STRUCTURE:BODY
The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these contaminants settle and remain on a painted vehicle surface, especially the horizonal areas of the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage can occur. This damage is the result of actual etching of the paint and appears as pitting or water spots. As acid rain droplets on the vehicle surface evaporate, the concentration strength of the acid increases, causing deeper and more rapid damage. This evaporation and corrosive action also occur more rapidly on dark colored cars as direct sun heat increases. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. In areas known for high frequency and/or concentration of acid rain, frequent vehicle washing during high heat or humidity periods will minimize the potential for paint damage caused by acid rain. It is further recommended that either reverse osmosis or deionized water be used to prevent water spotting.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle, especially the horizontal areas such as the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage to the painted surfaces can occur. Acid rain damage can typically be identified on vehicles by the presence of stains on the paint surface that resemble hard water spots. Unlike water spots however, acid rain damage cannot be removed by regular washing procedures. Also, because acid rain can etch and soften the paint, normal buffing or polishing repair procedures should not be attempted. This can cause further damage and result in visible depressions in the paint surface. The following are the three major categories of acid rain damage: •Minor damage: requires only buffing to repair. •Moderate damage: usually requires neutralizing, color sanding, and buffing. •Severe damage: extending beyond 1/2 mil of clearcoat on a pearl, metallic, or solid color, requires neutralization, sanding, and repainting. In cases where acid rain damage is minor, neutralization and buffing with a liquid-type paint finessing product may provide an adequate repair. Only specially formulated products outlined in this bulletin should be used for that purpose. Unfortunately, other than minor damage, there is no simple method of determining the actual extent (depth) of acid penetration other than color sanding a representative affected area until there is no visible etching or depressions, followed by measuring the amount of paint removed with either a magnetic or digital-type film thickness gauge. The procedures in this bulletin are intended for use by qualified body/paint technicians and should not be attempted by inexperienced personnel. It is the dealer’s responsibility to protect and maintain the quality of the vehicle’s paint finish after receipt at the dealership prior to the first sale. Perform frequent vehicle washing, as often as daily, during high heat and humidity periods to minimize the potential for paint damage due to acid rain exposure. This is especially important in geographical areas known for high frequency and concentration of acid rain and industrial fallout.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Toyota vehicles are currently protected with RapgardTM protective film designed to protect the horizontal painted surfaces. This material protects from acid rain, environmental fallout, and rail contamination. Follow the Removal Procedure in this bulletin to remove the RapgardTM protective film within 90 days from initial application.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Vehicles may occasionally be subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles shed from railroad tracks, train wheels, exposure to heavy machinery facilities, grinding, welding, etc. This type of contamination can be identified by the presence of small, red or brown particles on the paint surface. These particles are often difficult to see on dark color paints but can be easily felt when brushing a hand across horizontal body surfaces such as the hood, roof, or deck lid. Follow the Repair Procedure in this bulletin to clean vehicles that may have been subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles such as rail dust during rail transportation or extended storage near industrial areas.
STRUCTURE:BODY
To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 79 | 4 | 0 | 60.5 |
| 2024 | 142 | 4 | 0 | 54.2 |
| 2023 | 51 | 4 | 0 | 60.7 |
| 2022 | 57 | 3 | 0 | 60.2 |
| 2021 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 49.5 |
| 2020 | 86 | 1 | 0 | 47.4 |
| 2019 | 212 | 4 | 1 | 56.4 |
| 2018 | 202 | 3 | 1 | 56.9 |
| 2017 | 237 | 5 | 1 | 60.6 |
| 2016 | 323 | 4 | 1 | 53.8 |
| 2015 | 100 | 4 | 1 | 65.0 |
| 2014 | 93 | 4 | 1 | 60.9 |
| 2013 | 124 | 6 | 1 | 64.8 |
| 2012 | 294 | 7 | 1 | 54.9 |
| 2011 | 184 | 9 | 0 | 55.9 |
| 2010 | 291 | 13 | 0 | 54.1 |
| 2009 | 518 | 13 | 0 | 54.2 |
| 2008 | 445 | 11 | 0 | 57.7 |
| 2007 | 540 | 10 | 1 | 61.5 |
| 2006 | 782 | 11 | 1 | 58.7 |
| 2005 | 707 | 10 | 0 | 52.5 |
| 2004Viewing | 414 | 5 | 0 | 52.9 |
| 2003 | 359 | 5 | 0 | 54.2 |
| 2002 | 333 | 5 | 0 | 52.6 |
| 2001 | 396 | 6 | 0 | 56.3 |
| 2000 | 210 | 5 | 0 | 57.4 |
| 1999 | 249 | 5 | 0 | 56.6 |
| 1998 | 300 | 5 | 0 | 56.2 |
| 1997 | 131 | 4 | 0 | 54.4 |
| 1996 | 253 | 6 | 1 | 56.5 |
| 1995 | 177 | 6 | 1 | 61.0 |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.