POWER TRAIN:AXLE ASSEMBLY:AXLE SHAFT
2013 Ford Edge
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 2,444 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2013 Ford Edge, most frequently naming the electrical, brakes and body & structure categories. 2 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; 1 NHTSA investigation names it; and 84 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 2021 | 14 | 1,946 |
| Nov 2021 | 6 | 1,952 |
| Dec 2021 | 7 | 1,959 |
| Jan 2022 | 8 | 1,967 |
| Feb 2022 | 9 | 1,976 |
| Mar 2022 | 7 | 1,983 |
| Apr 2022 | 5 | 1,988 |
| May 2022 | 5 | 1,993 |
| Jun 2022 | 14 | 2,007 |
| Jul 2022 | 14 | 2,021 |
| Aug 2022 | 13 | 2,034 |
| Sep 2022 | 18 | 2,052 |
| Oct 2022 | 14 | 2,066 |
| Nov 2022 | 11 | 2,077 |
| Dec 2022 | 5 | 2,082 |
| Jan 2023 | 10 | 2,092 |
| Feb 2023 | 12 | 2,104 |
| Mar 2023 | 10 | 2,114 |
| Apr 2023 | 13 | 2,127 |
| May 2023 | 8 | 2,135 |
| Jun 2023 | 14 | 2,149 |
| Jul 2023 | 12 | 2,161 |
| Aug 2023 | 15 | 2,176 |
| Sep 2023 | 12 | 2,188 |
| Oct 2023 | 9 | 2,197 |
| Nov 2023 | 9 | 2,206 |
| Dec 2023 | 8 | 2,214 |
| Jan 2024 | 7 | 2,221 |
| Feb 2024 | 5 | 2,226 |
| Mar 2024 | 7 | 2,233 |
| Apr 2024 | 4 | 2,237 |
| May 2024 | 6 | 2,243 |
| Jun 2024 | 12 | 2,255 |
| Jul 2024 | 4 | 2,259 |
| Aug 2024 | 11 | 2,270 |
| Sep 2024 | 9 | 2,279 |
| Oct 2024 | 8 | 2,287 |
| Nov 2024 | 5 | 2,292 |
| Dec 2024 | 4 | 2,296 |
| Jan 2025 | 3 | 2,299 |
| Feb 2025 | 3 | 2,302 |
| Mar 2025 | 7 | 2,309 |
| Apr 2025 | 9 | 2,318 |
| May 2025 | 12 | 2,330 |
| Jun 2025 | 14 | 2,344 |
| Jul 2025 | 11 | 2,355 |
| Aug 2025 | 9 | 2,364 |
| Sep 2025 | 17 | 2,381 |
| Oct 2025 | 9 | 2,390 |
| Nov 2025 | 4 | 2,394 |
| Dec 2025 | 5 | 2,399 |
| Jan 2026 | 8 | 2,407 |
| Feb 2026 | 2 | 2,409 |
| Mar 2026 | 6 | 2,415 |
| Apr 2026 | 5 | 2,420 |
| May 2026 | 3 | 2,423 |
| Jun 2026 | 9 | 2,432 |
| Jul 2026 | 3 | 2,435 |
| Aug 2026 | 6 | 2,441 |
| Sep 2026 | 3 | 2,444 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Electrical85430.5%
- Brakes63122.5%
- Body & structure29910.7%
- Exterior lighting1916.8%
- Engine1796.4%
- Driver assistance1595.7%
- Powertrain (other)1575.6%
- Fuel system1033.7%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
2 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govFUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
Safety investigations
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
Door Ajar Warning Light Always On
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
The back up camera is inoperable at times. Rarely works on hot days or anytime the rear of the EDGE is facing the Sun. It hasn't worked properly for years. I'm not sure of the exact date or mileage it first happened, but it definitely started acting up around 2019.
- NHTSA ID
- 11763237
- Incident
- Sep 13, 2022
The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving at various speeds and attempting to decelerate or come to a complete stop, there was an abnormal sound while depressing the brake pedal. The brake warning light was illuminated. In addition, the contact stated that while in reverse, the rear-view camera displayed an upside-down image. The vehicle was taken to a local dealer where it was diagnosed and determined that the power booster brake hose needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. Upon further investigation, the contact associated the failure with an unknown recall; however, the VIN was not under recall. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure, and a case was filed. The failure mileage was approximately 100,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11761370
- Incident
- Aug 1, 2026
- Mileage
- 100,000 mi
The car did not brake randomly back in may when I was picking my toddler up from school. I contacted Ford dealership and they said braking issues is a known issue with the edge but my vehicle has no recalls. I could pay almost $300 for a diagnostic fee but nothing would be covered because their was a recall for the brake booster but that was back in 2013-2014. So I went to brakes plus, first they replaced the master cylinder then they replaced the brake booster a week later. Here I am 3 months later and the same issue.The vehicle randomly did not brake AGAIN. Got the vehicle back to brakes plus to have the vehicle looked at again. They replaced the brake booster under warranty then reached out to Ford who let them know the brake booster and brake lines are a know defect with the vehicle and I can have my vehicle looked at by them but I would need to pay the fee and nothing would be covered . How is this a known issue and nothing is covered? Ford checked my Vin and no vehicle recall. I reached out to Ford corporate and they created a case number: Cxh-09196123-F6m4z3 I am pregnant and I feel this car is dangerous if this is a known issue.
- NHTSA ID
- 11761285
- Incident
- Aug 28, 2026
Just purchased this used vehicle from Orange Auto Connection in [XXX] on XXX. Car was in perfect operating condition. 2 days later while driving with my 2 granddaughters I was approaching a stop sign at about 35-40 mph and as I started to push on the break pedal it became very soft and pushed all the way to the floor with no resistance. I thought the car wouldnt stop,. Thankfully it did without an accident . It has not returned to the normal breaking conditions. Today is XXX. I have to drive this car everyday as it is my only vehicle. I didn't buy an extended warranty from the dealer because I couldn't afford it. Why has this issue not become a safety recall. If I had known about this problem that has apparently been addressed years ago and had just expired in November 2025 prior to buying this car I wouldn't have purchased it. They are a lot of people including myself that live check to check and still struggle with every day necessities and potentially being faced with a heafty repair bill to fix a dangerous fault that manufacture knew about really causes sleepless nights and undo stress that they should not have to endure because they are afraid they will be hurt or hurt othera in an accident caused by a manufacture defect. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11761174
- Incident
- Jul 18, 2026
While driving on the highway at 70 mph, the driver's side front halfshaft completely detached from the vehicle, causing an immediate loss of drive power and creating a severe crash hazard."
- NHTSA ID
- 11759944
- Incident
- Aug 6, 2026
The backup camera will flip upside down or go completely blank or not work at all. I had my car in reverse and the camera didn’t come on and one time I flipped upside down and now it don’t work at all.
- NHTSA ID
- 11757333
- Incident
- Aug 16, 2026
The contact owns a 2013 Ford Edge. The contact stated that while driving approximately 30 MPH, the brake pedal was inoperative. The contact stated that the vehicle drove for several yards, and the contact was unable to reach the parking brake. The vehicle was shifted into park(P) to attempt to stop the vehicle. The contact stated that the vehicle crashed into the shrubs in front of the window at an independent mechanic shop, causing the vehicle to come to a stop right before almost crashing into the shop window, which resulted in minor damage to the front bumper. No warning lights were illuminated. The air bags were not deployed. An independent mechanic diagnosed the vehicle and stated that the brake pads and rotors needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired; however, the failure persisted. The vehicle was taken to another independent mechanic, where it was diagnosed and determined that the brake booster module needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired; however, the failure persisted. The contact researched and was made aware of an unknown recall; however, the VIN was not included. The failure had occurred on several occasions. There were no injuries sustained. A Police report was not filed. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 78,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11755254
- Incident
- Jul 7, 2026
- Mileage
- 78,000 mi
When I put my 2013 Ford edge in reverse the backup camera goes out for about 5 to 10 seconds or it just doesn’t work at all. And also I just paid $672 to have the drivers side door latch replaced because the recall had expired in November of 2025 the door ajar light would stay on and the dash would say place vehicle in park
- NHTSA ID
- 11755153
- Incident
- Aug 1, 2026
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; STRUCTURE:BODY
Ford and Lincoln vehicles equipped with wired keyless entry keypad systems and accessory wireless keyless entry keypad systems may or may not come with a wallet card containing the master code. Unlike the integrated wired keypad, the accessory wireless keypad master code cannot be retrieved from the vehicle using a diagnostic scan tool or from the label printed on the body control module (BCM). The Factory Keyless Entry Code application within the diagnostic scan tool will not provide an applicable master code for the accessory wireless keypad. If the wallet card for an accessory keypad is not available, the "Wireless RF Keypad Diagnosis Guide" can be referenced and provides direction on how to retrieve the master code. This guide is located under the Workshop Manual tab > Accessories > Installation > Wireless RF Keypad Diagnosis Guide > PPT C > Step C2.<br /><br /> Note: The only available keypad for some vehicles from the assembly plant is the accessory wireless keyless entry keypad. The integrated wired keypad cannot be installed on vehicles not equipped from the factory with a wired keyless entry k
While performing a transmission repair on some 2012-2024 Ford and Lincoln vehicles, a transmission seal kit may be on backorder due to supply chain interruptions. While performing a transmission repair on some 2012-2024 Ford and Lincoln vehicles, a transmission seal kit may be on backorder due to supply chain interruptions.
EQUIPMENT
All accessory stick-on keyless entry keypads come with a wallet card containing the master code. If the accessory keypad was factory installed, this card will be placed in the glove box and should be handed to the vehicles owner during initial delivery. Unlike the integrated (wired) factory keypad, the accessory keypad master code cannot be retrieved from the vehicle using a diagnostic scan tool. If the wallet card for an accessory keypad is lost, follow these steps to recover the code. Dealer Key Code access is granted through the Dealer Program Enrollment System (DPES); dealership management can authorize users. The authorized user must go to FMCDealer.com > Parts and Service > Parts Product Line Information > Keys/Entry Devices > Aftermarket Keyless Entry Keypad Code Access. Follow the instructions on the screen to obtain the master code for the accessory keypad.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
Certain 2010-2014 Model Year Edge and MKX Vehicles - Extended Warranty Coverage on Brake Booster
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
Certain 2010-2014 Model Year Edge and MKX Vehicles - Extended Warranty Coverage on Brake Booster
STRUCTURE
For 2000-2024 Ford and Lincoln vehicles, swapping a module from a vehicle for diagnosis purposes is likely to cause errors and is not recommended. It is also not recommended to order a replacement module using a vehicle identification number (VIN) from a different vehicle. Most modules on these affected vehicles are VIN/vehicle specific and hardware variations between modules do exist. Swapping a module from a vehicle or ordering a module using a different vehicle/VIN can cause ineffective repairs and additional vehicle down time. Make sure all appropriate Workshop Manual (WSM) procedures are followed when diagnosing the condition prior to all module replacements and only order modules using the correct VIN.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44 | 2 | 0 | 59.5 |
| 2023 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 55.1 |
| 2022 | 130 | 5 | 1 | 69.5 |
| 2021 | 111 | 7 | 1 | 65.4 |
| 2020 | 316 | 4 | 1 | 66.5 |
| 2019 | 766 | 3 | 0 | 56.8 |
| 2018 | 824 | 7 | 1 | 65.0 |
| 2017 | 1,357 | 8 | 3 | 67.7 |
| 2016 | 912 | 7 | 3 | 66.1 |
| 2015 | 726 | 7 | 3 | 65.0 |
| 2014 | 382 | 3 | 1 | 55.5 |
| 2013Viewing | 2,444 | 2 | 1 | 50.6 |
| 2012 | 1,134 | 3 | 1 | 51.8 |
| 2011 | 1,801 | 3 | 1 | 49.9 |
| 2010 | 673 | 7 | 0 | 50.4 |
| 2009 | 261 | 7 | 0 | 50.0 |
| 2008 | 1,119 | 7 | 2 | 57.0 |
| 2007 | 989 | 6 | 2 | 55.6 |
| 2004 | 3 | 0 | 0 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.