EQUIPMENT ADAPTIVE/MOBILITY:WHEELCHAIR RESTRAINTS/SECUREMENT:LATCH/ANCHOR:
2025 GMC Sierra 1500
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 116 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2025 GMC Sierra 1500, most frequently naming the engine, electrical and powertrain (other) categories. 1 safety recall has been issued covering this model year; 1 NHTSA investigation names it; and 448 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 2025 | 3 | 3 |
| Feb 2025 | 1 | 4 |
| Mar 2025 | 1 | 5 |
| Apr 2025 | 1 | 6 |
| May 2025 | 2 | 8 |
| Jun 2025 | 5 | 13 |
| Jul 2025 | 3 | 16 |
| Aug 2025 | 8 | 24 |
| Sep 2025 | 6 | 30 |
| Oct 2025 | 6 | 36 |
| Nov 2025 | 5 | 41 |
| Dec 2025 | 6 | 47 |
| Jan 2026 | 8 | 55 |
| Feb 2026 | 9 | 64 |
| Mar 2026 | 3 | 67 |
| Apr 2026 | 7 | 74 |
| May 2026 | 6 | 80 |
| Jun 2026 | 8 | 88 |
| Jul 2026 | 5 | 93 |
| Aug 2026 | 15 | 108 |
| Sep 2026 | 8 | 116 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Engine5635.4%
- Electrical2515.8%
- Powertrain (other)2515.8%
- Driver assistance2012.7%
- Visibility74.4%
- Brakes63.8%
- Fuel system63.8%
- Exterior lighting31.9%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
1 campaign cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSafety investigations
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
Loss of motive power due to engine failure post recall remedy
On January 16, 2026, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Recall Query RQ26001. This investigation was opened to assess the remedy effectiveness of Recall 25V-274. ODI has received complaints alleging engine failure in vehicles after the recall remedy had been completed, whether that remedy involved an oil viscosity change or a complete engine replacement. General Motors (GM) issued Recall 25V-274 to address concerns of engine failure in the L87 engines produced between March 1, 2021 and May 31, 2024. GM cited the root cause as a supplier manufacturing and quality issue. GM’s recall remedy for Recall 25V-274 consisted of two different repairs, either an oil viscosity change or an engine replacement, based on the results of the remedy inspection procedure. ODI continues to receive reports of engine failures after the completion of the recall remedy. To date, ODI has received 499 complaints alleging post-remedy engine failure in vehicles subject to Recall 25V-274, 473 of which involved an oil viscosity change and 26 a complete engine replacement. Additionally, ODI has received 191 reports of L87 engine failures in engines produced after the production period cited in Recall 25V-274. GM reported receiving 6,953 complaints of post-remedy engine failure. ODI is opening this Engineering Analysisto continue investigating complaints of post-remedy engine failure. ODI is expanding the scope of this Investigation to include engines produced after the production period cited in the recall. To review the ODI reports cited in the Opening Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
The contact owns a 2025 GMC Sierra 1500. The contact stated that while driving approximately 5 - 10 MPH, the vehicle went into LIMP Mode and failed to properly accelerate, and the transmission unexpectedly downshifted. There was an electrical malfunction, which caused the transmission to downshift. An unknown message was displayed on the instrument panel. The contact stated that the network was not operating at the correct voltage due to the wiring harness. The engine light illuminated after the failure. The vehicle was towed on two occasions to the dealer to attempt to duplicate the failure. The dealer was unable to determine how to repair the vehicle. The vehicle was driven to the dealer in LIMP Mode. The manufacturer, General Motors, was contacted by the dealer, and the contact also reported the failure to the manufacturer. A General Motors service engineer had inspected the vehicle. The failure mileage was approximately 34,637.
- NHTSA ID
- 11765016
- Incident
- Sep 2, 2025
- Mileage
- 34,637 mi
Turned on vehicle and an alert popped up "Brake system control module malfunction", limited speed to 43 miles per hour, no power breaks worked. I have had no issues with brake system for the first 11k miles. I contacted my local GMC dealership (Banks Chevrolette in Concord, NH) and was told that I would not be able to get an appointment until the 2nd week of November. I told them this was a break system issue covered under warranty and they told me I was welcome to DRIVE to their dealership (14 mi away on INTERSTATES and CITY STREETS) and wait to see if there was any time to plug it in, but they would not guarantee there would be time on their end. I spoke with the service manager and was told the same and that his advice was to "not drive it until November". I was able to take the truck to a shop in town 2 mi away , and they printed off the following codes: P25A U160F U1610 U2418 U2419
- NHTSA ID
- 11764636
- Incident
- Sep 15, 2026
Super cruise was engaged on I-95 and attempted a lane change. Another vehicle was in a position along side my vehicle that would have resulted in an accident if I had not noticed it and manually grabbed the steering wheel to override the super cruise. I have an appt with the dealer next week. The vehicle is also is occasionally displaying a "service driver assistance system" message
- NHTSA ID
- 11764349
- Incident
- Sep 14, 2026
I was driving in town when all lights on the dash lit up, and I mean all of them. I was approaching a traffic light in low traffic in the 20-30mpg range. I went to apply the brakes and almost had none. If I was going to estimate how much braking was available, it would be in the 10% range. I drove at 20mph to the nearest dealer. They verified the issues. They reflashed the computer, drove the truck afterwards, and pumped the brakes. They told me they recommended an immediate master cylinder replacement. They had seen this twice already in the month of August. Both times prior to mine the reflash initially worked, but the problem returned within a week, and the master cylinders had to be replaced. The master cylinder replacement was a $2600 repair.
- NHTSA ID
- 11763693
- Incident
- Aug 31, 2026
When updating the vehicle as prompted by the entrainment system the next day when attempting to start the vehicle it did not start. Vehicle had to be jumped then 6 warning lights came on and disappeared shortly after driving.
- NHTSA ID
- 11763207
- Incident
- Sep 9, 2026
On XXX my 2025 gmc sierra 6.2L v8 engine experience catastrophic engine failure with no preexisting alerts or warnings. It was towed to Baglier gmc in [XXX] on XXX and is currently awaiting diagnostic evaluation. Upon restarting the vehicle after failure, the engine light did turn on. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11762694
- Incident
- Sep 5, 2026
So I spent many months trying to aquire a GMC Sierra Denali and with all the issues with the 20 - 24 6.2 engines we were assured by the dealer that all the issues were resolved with the 2025 6.2 models. So we spent big to aquire an 2025. So I bought one new. My truck had 8000 miles on it with 2 oil changes. So we booked a trip to [XXX] at considerably a large expense and loaded up our Harley's on my light aluminum trailer, less than 3.5k pounds and headed that way from [XXX]. We made it to [XXX] and spent the night. Next morning we were heading to [XXX] and the truck blew up on the XXX. We were pulled over on a very busy hi way and had to get truck and trailer towed back to [XXX]. We were stuck there for 3 days while GMC installed a rebuilt motor in my 83k truck and totally missed our entire vacation. On line it said GMC would cover hotel and 40.00 dollars a day food. I am so disgusted after being reassured that GMC had fixed the 6.2 and putting our life in danger blowing up on a major highway, and afterward GMC only gave us 200. For our inconvenience. Our room alone was more not counting the money lost on out trip accommodations. I am so completely disappointed with this truck that we bought new and spent more than we ever had on a vehicle, and am afraid of ever taking another trip in it. How can GM be allowed to do this to people. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11762000
- Incident
- Jul 25, 2026
Safety Complaint – 2025 GMC Sierra 1500 Tailgate While driving our 2025 GMC Sierra 1500 and towing a trailer, the tailgate unexpectedly opened and dropped down while the vehicle was in motion. No one touched the tailgate button, key fob, or any other controls to activate the tailgate. We were unaware that the tailgate had opened. When we made a turn, the trailer contacted the tailgate and crushed/damaged it. This occurred without any intentional activation of the tailgate release. We believe this presents a significant safety concern because an unexpectedly opening tailgate while driving, especially while towing a trailer, could result in property damage, loss of cargo, or a more serious accident. We are requesting that this issue be investigated to determine whether there is a defect with the tailgate latch, release mechanism, or electronic controls on the 2025 GMC Sierra 1500.
- NHTSA ID
- 11761746
- Incident
- Mar 15, 2026
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
This PI is created to inform GM dealers that some vehicles may intermittently fail to connect wireless Apple CarPlay or Android Auto after Bluetooth pairing during the first key cycle. The condition is caused by a software anomaly.
This PI is to instruct dealer on diagnostic procedures that need to be completed prior to replacing a radio or IPC display
This preliminary information advises a dealer on how to email GDS2 session logs into Technical Assistance.
This preliminary information communicates a diagnostic tip for the tailgate release system and tailgate ajar message.
This PI is created to inform GM dealers that some vehicles may intermittently fail to connect wireless Apple CarPlay or Android Auto after Bluetooth pairing during the first key cycle. The condition is caused by a software anomaly. Do not replace parts. Engineering is investigating the root cause; customers may continue to drive the vehicle. This PI will be updated or replaced by a TSB once a resolution is determined.
This PI communications information that Engineering has released an OTA to correct the Service Driver Assist message with current DTC B1B2F Telematics Control Module and U1624 Image Processing Control Module setting.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 121 | 2 | 1 | 56.5 |
| 2025Viewing | 116 | 1 | 1 | 51.8 |
| 2024 | 360 | 1 | 4 | 56.9 |
| 2023 | 479 | 3 | 4 | 63.7 |
| 2022 | 585 | 6 | 4 | 66.4 |
| 2021 | 570 | 7 | 5 | 69.0 |
| 2020 | 466 | 12 | 3 | 69.7 |
| 2019 | 645 | 10 | 2 | 68.8 |
| 2018 | 304 | 7 | 0 | 56.0 |
| 2017 | 354 | 6 | 0 | 56.2 |
| 2016 | 341 | 8 | 1 | 59.2 |
| 2015 | 718 | 9 | 2 | 59.9 |
| 2014 | 739 | 9 | 2 | 57.4 |
| 2013 | 115 | 3 | 2 | 53.4 |
| 2012 | 107 | 3 | 2 | 54.7 |
| 2011 | 284 | 5 | 2 | 55.2 |
| 2010 | 168 | 4 | 2 | 56.3 |
| 2009 | 234 | 4 | 2 | 55.4 |
| 2008 | 381 | 2 | 3 | 57.5 |
| 2007 | 262 | 3 | 3 | 57.2 |
| 2006 | 145 | 2 | 0 | 48.5 |
| 2005 | 177 | 3 | 0 | 48.2 |
| 2004 | 212 | 5 | 0 | 47.9 |
| 2003 | 180 | 4 | 0 | 52.3 |
| 2002 | 166 | 4 | 2 | 61.9 |
| 2001 | 140 | 5 | 2 | 59.5 |
| 2000 | 181 | 3 | 2 | 56.5 |
| 1999 | 158 | 4 | 2 | 57.2 |
| 1998 | 59 | 4 | 0 | 53.3 |
| 1997 | 83 | 5 | 0 | 43.4 |
| 1996 | 5 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1995 | 3 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1994 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 29.4 |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.